Sentences with phrase «as abominations in»

Not exact matches

Mr Ngole, who was studying for a Masters in Social Work, had signalled his opposition to gay marriage before posting part of Leviticus 20:13, which says: «If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.»

In all cases it is inferred as to pattern and whether or not it is an abomination is dependent on many factors.

Only three times can we possibly infer gays as an abomination out of the 89 times «abominations» are addressed in the Bible.

Abominations in his eyes, picking and choosing what to follow as his word.

Those of you who blast the religious cite ignorance and hypocrisy and the abominations committed by individuals in the name of religion as a basis for denegrating the entire section of society.

The Amish, the Mormons, the Catholics, various fundamentalist churches — including the ones who speak in tongues and handle snakes, the Westboro Baptist Church, churches that denounce ho - mose - xuality as an abomination and churches that marry gays and admit them to their clergy, and a lot who belong to no church at all.

I have no idea of what part of mankind should not lie with a man as with a woman that this is an abomination committed, and in those days was punishable by death, that you people don't understand.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

The ho mose xual abomination still required a death sentence and still does as does every sin, not in hate but in justice for Love to be pure and Godly the sin must be punished.

In answer to a question about the attitude of churches to the occupation, I was criticised for implying that I regard the Messianic churches as an abomination.

Paul sees male - male sex as an impurity, a taboo, uncleanness — in other words, «abomination.»

The original version of this verse in the Torah is «Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination.»

Note also that, while the word «abomination» has been used with reference to homosexuality, the biblical interpretation of the word «abomination» relates to any act of uncleanness as set out in the Holiness Code, such as eating shellfish, trimming your hair, touching the skin of a dead pig (should we stone the entire NFL?)

In 167 B.C. Antiochus precipitated a full - scale revolt when, having already forbidden the practice of Judaism on pain of death, he set up in the Jewish temple an altar to Zeus and offered swine's flesh upon it (which the Book of Daniel refers to as the «abomination of desolation») Antiochus was an apostle of Hellenism and meant to bring his entire realm under the influence of Greek wayIn 167 B.C. Antiochus precipitated a full - scale revolt when, having already forbidden the practice of Judaism on pain of death, he set up in the Jewish temple an altar to Zeus and offered swine's flesh upon it (which the Book of Daniel refers to as the «abomination of desolation») Antiochus was an apostle of Hellenism and meant to bring his entire realm under the influence of Greek wayin the Jewish temple an altar to Zeus and offered swine's flesh upon it (which the Book of Daniel refers to as the «abomination of desolation») Antiochus was an apostle of Hellenism and meant to bring his entire realm under the influence of Greek ways.

Webb points to the oft - quoted passage in Leviticus 18 which condemns homosexuality as «an abomination,» and the highly negative references to homosexuality in the Pauline epistles.

We've isolated and condemned homosexuality as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a sexual thing (and we're obsessed with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from others people's eyes.)

From Ryan Lizza's enlightening profile in The New Yorker, I learned that Michele Bachmann's influences include spiritual and political mentors who preach the literal «inerrancy» of the Bible, who warn Christians to be suspicious of ideas that come from non-Christians, who believe homosexuality is an «abomination,» who portray the pre-Civil War South as a pretty nice place for slaves and who advocate «Dominionism,» the view that Christians and only Christians should preside over earthly institutions.

The Dead despise & scorn thee & cast thee out as accursed, Seeing the Lamb of God in thy gardens & thy palaces Where they desire to place the Abomination of Desolation.»

I mean, isn't a scientist «playing god» as it were by creating life out of nothing and if this «abomination» is made in the lab and not in a womb, does it count as even human?

But dost thou believe it could occur to him, dost thou believe it would be possible for him, dost thou not believe that it would be an abomination to him, to talk in such a way as to try to prove by three reasons that there is after all something in this thing of being in love?

In there Moses says that a wife that has been divorced can not return to her first husband after remarriage, as that is an abomination to the Lord.

And yet these sporadic chinks of light are couched in the context of heavy and unhelpful language in which abortion is variously referred to as an «abomination» (p87), «this moral leprosy», «this savage beast» (p175) or «a violent and soul - destroying act» (p218), to name but a few.

God gives us a se.xual desire, and that's a good thing, but when we attempt to satisfy that in prohibited ways such as with abominations like ho.mose.xuality, or s.ex before marriage, that becomes sinful.

In addition (speaking as an atheist) I am told by proper, earnest, well - meaning evangelicals that it is an unforgiveable sin purely not to believe in God, and because of that, I'm beyond the pale and some kind of abomination in the eyes of GoIn addition (speaking as an atheist) I am told by proper, earnest, well - meaning evangelicals that it is an unforgiveable sin purely not to believe in God, and because of that, I'm beyond the pale and some kind of abomination in the eyes of Goin God, and because of that, I'm beyond the pale and some kind of abomination in the eyes of Goin the eyes of God.

As for flat rules on morals there aren't that many you just fall in the ones that God says are a abomination.

It may well be that those critics are right who suggest that the model who sat for this portrait of the Man of Sin was the mad Emperor Caligula, whose attempt to set up his image in the Temple had deeply affronted Jewish sentiment, recalling, as it did, the sacrilege of Antiochus Epiphanes, which Daniel had described as «the abomination of desolation.»

Not that it stopped satan from trying to pollute the bloodlines of Gods people as in the fallen angels and the children born of those women were abominations and so God destroyed every last one.Once again the flood was what God used to purge the evil as the bloodlines were polluted and to keep the bloodlines safe as God had promised he was going to raise up a seed that was going to destroy Satan and his name was Jesus..

leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them» GOD said this in the old testament doesn't sound like thought it a good thing then.

He knew it existed, as we know that crime and abominations exist; he had heard of it as a peaceable citizen in a town hears of battles, famines, and floods, and yet knows nothing of what these things mean — though, indeed, he may have been mixed up in a street row, have gone without his dinner once, or been soaked to the skin in a shower.

the early church was (for the most part) more flawed and now guilty of crimes against God in that there have been abominations such as the catholic church that bring paganism into people as something of God

@John And while you presumably can say «I love you» in every language and have it mean more or less the same, you DO N'T say «if you don't believe as I do, the loving god will subject you to eternal torment and, oh by the way, gays are an abomination and god doesn't want them to have the same rights that you and I enjoy» in every religion.

Why do you think that slavery in the early century in the middle east as an abomination?

b) The word that was in the original work, «to'ebah,» which was translated into Greek as «bdglygma» actually means «ritual impurity» rather than abomination (or enormous sin).

But it is specifically identified as an abomination prior to Moses, under the Mosaic covenant, and of course in the NT.

Again it has nothing to do with gays as we know and understand it today «word abomination is the same in the original Hebrew as Leviticus referring to hom - o $ exuality.»

Ezekiel 16:49 - 50 the word abomination is the same in the original Hebrew as Leviticus referring to hom - o $ exuality.

That which is an abomination unto me, I shall not eat, (nay) I shall live upon cakes (made) of white grain, and my ale shall be (made) of the red grain of Hapi.10 In a clean place I shall sit on the ground beneath the foliage of the date palm of the goddess Hathor, who dwelleth in the spacious Disk as it advanceth to Annu (Heliopolis), having the books of the divine words of the writings of the god ThotIn a clean place I shall sit on the ground beneath the foliage of the date palm of the goddess Hathor, who dwelleth in the spacious Disk as it advanceth to Annu (Heliopolis), having the books of the divine words of the writings of the god Thotin the spacious Disk as it advanceth to Annu (Heliopolis), having the books of the divine words of the writings of the god Thoth.

We will in no way be aligning ourselves with any particular viewpoint regarding the etiology or desirability of h0m0 behavior 22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination.

Sunday lunch at Red Lobster is an abomination, as is mowing your lawn before sundown on the sabbath... where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?

Note also that, while the word «abomination» has been used with reference to hom ose xuality, the biblical interpretation of the word «abomination» relates to any act of uncleanness as set out in the Holiness Code, such as eating shellfish, trimming your hair, touching the skin of a dead pig (should we stone the entire NFL?)

When it comes to the Leviticus texts, the Queen James Bible translates Leviticus 18:22 as «Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind in the temple of Molech: it is an abomination.»

Often cited in the discussion regarding same - sex relationships are Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, which describe same - sex behavior between males as an «abomination» punishable by death.

As Matthew points out, in the vast majority of cases, the word «abomination» (typically the Hebrew, toevah, which is used in Leviticus 18 and 20) refers to what the Israelites associated with the idolatrous practices of the Gentiles, leading Old Testament scholar Phyllis Bird to conclude that «it is not an ethical term, but a term for boundary making,» with «a basic sense of taboo.»

In fact «omen reading» was an abomination and forbidden, (as stated in LeviticusIn fact «omen reading» was an abomination and forbidden, (as stated in Leviticusin Leviticus).

the bible has lists of many sins that are punishable by death some that are punishable by exile and some that are punishable by tribunal and taking of property when the bible refers to all sins being the same it is they are all an abomination to the lord not a reference to how serious a sin they are do you really believe that murdering a 2 year old with acid is the same kind of sin as calling in sick to work when your not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG it is unbelievable how ignorant you all are and how you think you can turn the bible on itself a true Christian that has read thoroughly and has no agenda like ms cnn here does knows the difference

I bet that, in a lineup with a regular «carrot cake» cupcakes (particularly those abominations found at coffee shops that are pretty much just sugar with an inch of faux - carrot on top), they'd be picked out as best - tasting by most people.

Because they can't do that as it's an abomination for Spurs to finish above Arsenal in the table to win a title as St. Totteringham Day is still very much reigning.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

The last Arsenal «shake up» occurred after the abomination of a defeat to United back in 2011, when Arsène finally admitted in August that the team needed a heck of an overhaul to even get close to competing for top four that he brought in Big Per, Arteta, Benayoun and Andre Santos as the window -LSB-...]

Thankfully for a handful of EPL teams domestic play resumes again in earnest after performances in the Champions League that can only be described as abominations.