I don't see how alarmists can claim one
as absolute truth without recognising the possibility of the other.
Not exact matches
without implying the answer, so the very structure of reason, its very meaning and drive toward ultimate
truth, implies the existence of God as Absolute Truth, as the very Ground of re
truth, implies the existence of God
as Absolute Truth, as the very Ground of re
Truth,
as the very Ground of reason.
Without an «
Absolute Source» of truth, there is no absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
Absolute Source» of
truth, there is no
absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
absolute truth, yet you argue herein
as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that there isn't.
God, constant is not a mystery,
as you hind, speculate from hindism, ignorance, but fact of life,
truth absolute, nothing can exist
without, and foundation of American Consti tution.
Regardless, and
without any check on him at all, it's all presented with the veneer of dark and evil forces at work, and
as absolute truth and «support» for all his implied and / or expressly stated allegations.