I hear from those in large law libraries that are somewhat open to the public, such
as academic law libraries, that they get a number of pro se litigants — i.e. people who intend on representing themselves in court — trying to do legal research.
Not exact matches
Like many
academic libraries all over the world, Harvard's
law library was «good at getting people their books when they came through our door,» he said, «but not
as good when they came through our virtual door.»
In 1983, the
Library Network
Law was enacted establishing the New Jersey
Library Network
as a mechanism for
academic, institutional, public, school and special
libraries to cooperatively provide New Jersey residents with full and equal access to
library materials, programs and information that might not otherwise be available in their local communities.
So the onus comes back to major
academic libraries (and national
law libraries where they exist) to take up the responsibility to purchase paper versions of key resources for
as long
as they are able to afford it.
As many
academic law libraries are open to the public and are a filler of the Access to Justice, it's important that the
library has resources available to them.
The discussion was mostly around digital preservation, in the course of this it became apparent that the biggest growing concern in
academic law libraries is wholesale tossing of print book and journal collections in favour of databases such as the «Making of Modern Law» [http://www.galeuk.com/trials/moml/] in addition to the plan of Google and large research libraries (Harvard, Yale, Oxford, etc.) to digitize their entire collectio
law libraries is wholesale tossing of print book and journal collections in favour of databases such
as the «Making of Modern
Law» [http://www.galeuk.com/trials/moml/] in addition to the plan of Google and large research libraries (Harvard, Yale, Oxford, etc.) to digitize their entire collectio
Law» [http://www.galeuk.com/trials/moml/] in addition to the plan of Google and large research
libraries (Harvard, Yale, Oxford, etc.) to digitize their entire collections.
I have found many useful resources
as I've embarked on learning
law from scratch: court resources, Duhaime's online
law dictionary, CanLII,
law firms» newsletters, the
academic literature,
law libraries, and the time I've been able to afford with lawyers who kindly provide «coaching.»
In defence of LRW instruction in
law schools, at least from the point of view of
law librarians, I should point out that we work at universities, and
as such we have to make sure our students know how to do
academic research and writing,
as well
as how to do practical legal research and writing — something colleagues in the rest of the university
libraries do not have to contend with, unless they also work in professional schools.
Traditional
library metrics are less helpful for
law firm
libraries compared to public or
academic libraries; for example, circulation statistics are often used
as an indicator of
library usage and what parts of the
library collection are in highest demand.
As noted in the American Association of
Law Libraries Access to Justice White Paper, legal research instruction has always been core to
academic librarianship.
I use these
as examples because its very unlikely that any
academic law library in Canada has given any thought to canceling the print and probably most would recoil at the suggestion.
This should be a valuable addition to
academic and court
law libraries,
as well
as to firms with a significant litigation practice.»
Ideally, one of our colleagues in an
academic law library in Canada would take ownership of this type of customized search engine since Google search engines customized by Universities are eligible for «ad - free» sites (the foregoing link includes Google ads
as part of the search results, something which I would prefer to do without).
As our community of
academic law libraries becomes smaller and more anemic, our university
libraries may be able to provide us with a transfusion of new skills and influence within a wider information environment with greater collaborative potential, which we could use to further and promote legal information initiatives in our institutions and nationally.
Our SIGs,
as we call them, are communities of practice whether that be a workplace type, like the
Academic Law Libraries SIG or a broader topic like the Access Services and Resource Sharing SIG.
Now,
as a public services librarian in an
academic law library, I do little targeted legal research.