Not only have measures of wellbeing and happiness ceased to rise with economic growth but,
as affluent societies have grown richer, there have been long - term rises in rates of anxiety, depression and numerous other social problems.
Not only have measures of well - being and happiness ceased to rise with economic growth but,
as affluent societies have grown richer, there have been long - term rises in rates of anxiety, depression, and numerous other social problems.
Not exact matches
So even though trying to live faithfully
as part of an
affluent society, with all the temptations this entails, is in some ways more difficult and more uncomfortable than living the radical response, it does have several important advantages:
The pastor realizes that people's needs are virtually limitless, particularly in an
affluent society in which there is an ever - rising threshold of desire (which we define
as «need»).
In 1970, JK Galbraith observed in The
Affluent Society that «few things are more evident in modern social history than the decline of interest in inequality
as an economic issue».
«
As societies become more
affluent, they can afford more luxuries.
«
As the Western world becomes more
affluent, I wanted to know how a sense of abundance affects creativity, because it's creativity that moves
society forward,» Mehta said.
In fact, according to an analysis by Urban Institute, students in Colorado's poorest districts receive only an additional $ 401 per student relative to more
affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years even
as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across
society.
Building on this critique, Speth goes on to conclude in his book that: (1) «today's system of political economy, referred to here
as modern capitalism, is destructive of the environment, and not in a minor way but in a way that profoundly threatens the planet» (2) «the
affluent societies have reached or soon will reach the point where,
as Keynes put it, the economic problem has been solved... there is enough to go around» (3) «in the more
affluent societies, modern capitalism is no longer enhancing human well - being» (4) «the international social movement for change — which refers to itself
as «the irresistible rise of global anti-capitalism» — is stronger than many imagine and will grow stronger; there is a coalescing of forces: peace, social justice, community, ecology, feminism — a movement of movements» (5) «people and groups are busily planting the seeds of change through a host of alternative arrangements, and still other attractive directions for upgrading to a new operating system have been identified» (6) «the end of the Cold War... opens the door... for the questioning of today's capitalism.»
To me this would appear to be a worst case scenario, based on the least developed economies building up energy infrastructures largely using fossil fuels, in order to pull their populations out of poverty,
as China and India are doing today (thereby reducing their rate of population growth
as they become more
affluent and improving their carbon efficiencies) and the remaining
societies continuing to improve their overall carbon efficiencies
as they have already been doing.
So if you are a privileged relatively
affluent person who does not like taxes (dreams of bureaucrats) and on the other hand loves «freedom» reigning in
society as well
as in nature, the worst thing now would be a surge of justified guilt feelings and then solidarity resulting from recognition of AGW.
But NGOs and the civil
society will likely have to wait a long time for
affluent countries to make firm commitments on funding, risk transfer mechanisms such
as insurance, and technology to help poor countries improve their resilience to climate change.