As against a respondent who is not habitually resident and is not either a national of a Member State or, in the case of the United Kingdom and Ireland, does not have his «domicile» within the territory of one of the latter Member States, any national of a Member State who is habitually resident within the territory of another Member State may, like the nationals of that State, avail himself of the rules of jurisdiction applicable in that State.
She abandoned potential claims in trust
as against the respondent's corporate assets, but had agreed to this two years before when the issue was first discussed.
A Motion Judge grants summary judgment dismissing the Appellant's action
as against the Respondents (County of Simcoe Paramedic Services, Paramedic J. Doe, nine doctors, and Barrie Medical Clinics Inc.).
Not exact matches
A sizeable minority of
respondents (39 — 40 %) see bitcoin
as a potential analog to physical gold, both
as a safe haven and a hedge
against mistakes in central bank monetary policy.
Despite that fact, most of the poll
respondents are
against layoffs, especially for teachers,
as well
as reducing pensions for workers.
«All other averments relating to fraudulent activities
against the applicant remain largely in the realm of imagination of the
respondent and unproved
as there is no such document before the court.
When the case was called on Monday, counsel to the
respondent, Adedipe informed the court of a notice of Appeal he had filed
against the court's ruling
as well
as a motion for stay of further proceedings.
The PPP took the case to court seeking «an order directed
against the 1st
respondent in her capacity
as returning officer for presidential elections to grant the applicant the opportunity to amend and alter the one anomaly found in his nomination papers
as well
as accept his nomination papers
as amended or altered to enable him contest
as a presidential candidate for the 7th December 2016 elections.»
The Court was therefore able to accept that the barrier raised
against others by a veil concealing the face was perceived by the
respondent State
as breaching the right of others to live in a space of socialisation which made living together easier.
In the Matter of the Application of Dennis J. Malone, Petitioner (s), # 1799/2013 -
against - The Rockland County Board of Elections and Louis C. Babcock and Kristen Zebrowski Stavisky,
as Commissioners and Wayne T. Ballard and «John Doe»
Respondent (s), there was extensive testimony about the roles played by Highway Department employees in collecting absentee ballots for the Highway Superintendent race.
Respondents in this year's survey pointed to five main causes of the field's less than favorable reputation: drug and product recalls such
as the withdrawal of Avandia; safety issues such
as the discovery of problems with raw material from China used in medical products; scandals, including evidence that pharmaceutical companies have failed to release data from trials whose results cast doubts on their drugs» safety and efficacy; lawsuits brought
against companies that failed to warn patients of problems with their products; and ethical issues such
as kickbacks for physicians promoting specific medications.
Frequent hand - washing,
as often
as 10 times a day, is one of the most recommended defenses
against the flu, but 39 % of
respondents seldom or never wash after coughing or sneezing.
For example, when vouchers were offered
as a reform strategy directly
against «doing what it takes to put a fully qualified teacher in every classroom,» 84 percent of
respondents voted for teacher quality in contrast with 17 percent who voted for vouchers.
«We ask
respondents for the ISBN of the book they have purchased and
as they take the survey, this is matched
against industry bibliographic databases (which do include some self - published ebooks) through an API look - up.
So in a 2015 poll, they broke out the question a little to It then asks
respondents which areas they would like science and innovation to prioritize over the next 15 years, with areas such
as job creation, health and medical care, energy supply, education and skills, and the fight
against climate change among the issues they are asked to consider.
Consequently, only 127 people that could be described
as sceptics of climate science responded to the survey
against the 1018
respondents that Lewandowsky categorises
as «pro-science».
Despite the recent accusations of fraud levied
against climate scientists,
respondents continue to place a high level of trust in scientists
as sources of climate change information.
Syncrude and Mr. Hammond brought an action
against the
Respondent for damages, and Syncrude applied to the court for a preliminary determination
as to whether Syncrude was subrogated to Mr. Hammond's right of recovery in respect of income benefits paid by Syncrude to him, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 626.1.
Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers Trust disclosure applications (including
against unusual
respondents such
as email service providers and solicitors)
The argument that the
respondent discriminated
against her on the basis of disability, however, is advanced in the alternative with some reluctance on the applicant's part, because, notwithstanding that she has been diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (by psychiatrist Dr. Chris McIntosh who testified at the hearing of this matter), the applicant does not regard her gender identity
as a «disability».
In 2001, the
respondent's majority shareholder learned of the bylaw, and when Lorraine refused to amend it the developer brought an action in nullity
against the bylaw in 2007, seeking damages and the removal of the infrastructures,
as well
as an action
against the Municipality of Thérèse de Blainville, which implemented a plan that also changed the zoning for the
respondent's land.
Here, while both appellant and
respondents are innoncent of any wrongdoing
as against any persons, it was the carelessness of the
respondents which resulted in the wrongdoing being able to inflict the loss.
The decision upheld the use of race
as one of many factors, but ruled
against setting aside positions that could only be filled by members of racial group («forecloses consideration to persons like
respondent»).
(For example, the BC College of Teachers involves a one - way costs system — costs can be awarded only
against a
respondent — but perhaps
as a result, a practice has evolved such that historically, panels have not awarded costs
against respondent teachers except to sanction conduct during a proceeding that is deserving of rebuke.)
Successfully acting for liquidators in obtaining summary judgment in very substantial misfeasance proceedings,
as well
as orders on a committal application,
against multiple
respondents arising out of the collapse of a large retail company
Commercial Arbitration and Investor - State Arbitration under the rules of one of the major international arbitration institutions, such
as the ICC, LCIA or ICSID and subject to a wide range of laws can be financed in a variety of venues,
against respondents whose assets appear to be available to satisfy any award.
-- Instructed by Clifford Chance (
as junior to Joe Smouha QC) to act for the
respondent to an application under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 challenging an LCIA award concerning a # 480 million claim for breach of contract — Instructed by Slaughter and May (
as junior to David Streatfeild James QC) in an ICC arbitration involving a claim
against a German conglomerate in the industrial sector.
In their submissions for special costs, the
Respondents summarized the allegations and personal «attacks» made
against them
as follows:
[98] Some
respondents championed LSPs
as important for meeting the access to justice gap, but argued
against their regulation by state courts on the grounds either it is unnecessary (they are already regulated by consumer protection laws), that it would unnecessarily increase costs, or that regulation would only enable the state bars and courts to exercise their «protectionist instincts.»
It seeks the annulment of an arbitral award which a Dutch insurance group
as a
respondent has obtained
against it.
The Applicant commenced an action and sought certification
as a class action
against the
Respondent.
As part of the
Respondent's claim for division of property, she asserts an entitlement to constructive trust
against proceeds from the sale of the Applicant's corporate shares.
Individuals who believe they have experienced adverse treatment in one of the five social areas,
as a result of a Code listed ground, can file an application with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario if the potential
Respondent (the individual
against who the application will be filed) is under provincial jurisdiction.
She subsequently obtained a consent order adding the individual appellants, all directors of Local 773,
as defendants, and amended the statement of claim to plead that that the individual
respondents were jointly and severally liable for her claim
as against Local 773.
The Tribunal ultimately concluded that the
respondent had violated the Ontario Human rights Code
as she had discriminated
against the applicant on the basis of her disability in relation to the notes posted on the door and that her negative comments and complaints about the service dog created a «poisoned environment» for the applicant.
Due to the regulatory scheme and the Visitors of the Inns of Court's jurisdiction,
as applicable to the disciplinary proceedings
against the Appellant, the Supreme Court concluded that the
Respondent's part in the proceedings before the Disciplinary Tribunal and those before the Visitors should be regarded
as part of a single continuing act.
«It would be surprising if a claimant in civil proceedings, who had to allege criminal conduct
as a necessary part of his claim in rem, was not required to give the
respondent and the court at least some particulars of what that conduct was said to be... It seems to me to be essential that if there is to be a fair trial that the
respondent should know the case
against him in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare properly to meet it.»
As a result of this, practitioners have anticipated a greater need for more specific drafting of non — molestation orders (see «Domestic Violence and Family Law: A New Era», Bansi Soni, Family Law Week, 13 July 2007), as opposed to the previously general form of: «the Respondent must not use or threaten to use violence against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicant.&raqu
As a result of this, practitioners have anticipated a greater need for more specific drafting of non — molestation orders (see «Domestic Violence and Family Law: A New Era», Bansi Soni, Family Law Week, 13 July 2007),
as opposed to the previously general form of: «the Respondent must not use or threaten to use violence against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicant.&raqu
as opposed to the previously general form of: «the
Respondent must not use or threaten to use violence
against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicant.»
On day one, we heard from counsel for TWU twice; once
as appellants
against the Law Society of Ontario (formerly LSUC) and once
as respondents to the Law Society of British Columbia.
However Visteon Ltd was subsequently replaced
as the
respondent due to weaknesses in Cairns's claim
against MSX Ltd..
In so far
as issue of forgery raised by the
respondent is concerned, learned senior counsel submits that though the learned arbitrator was justified in rendering such finding in view of the pleadings filed by the parties, the claimants would not rely upon such finding of forgery for filing any criminal proceedings
against the
respondent based on such findings rendered by the learned arbitrator.
The trial judge found that the appellant was motivated by express malice
against Dr. Elmasry, and that he viewed the
respondent and Dr. Elmasry «for all intents and purposes,
as one and the same.»
The applicant commenced an action
against the
respondent, claiming damages from losses she incurred
as a trader.
As the claim of the Estate is
against the defendants, the right to raise a limitations defence lies with them, not the
respondents.
Learned senior counsel submits that if such finding of forgery rendered by the learned arbitrator which amounts to a serious criminal::: Downloaded on - 13/05/2014 23:52:28::: Kvm 42/107 ARBP259.13 charge is not set aside, such award would be a decree of this Court and would be executed by the claimant by filing criminal proceedings
against the
respondent based on such perverse finding which are without jurisdiction, such award would be thus in conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Act and even under the narrower ground of public policy while considering the objection to the enforcement of a foreign award
as held by the SC in case of Shri Lal Mahal Ltd..
The
respondent's spouse, who had been borrowing large sums of money from the appellant, signed a promissory note agreeing to register a mortgage
against the property in the appellant's favour
as security for the loans.
One
respondent cautioned
against using the corporate structure of a PBC for anything other than holding native title, such
as commercial enterprise, because although the NTA protects native title rights and interests held by the PBC from liability incurred by the body corporate, the non-native title assets of the PBC, of individual members and of the broader native title group could be at risk if the PBC was wound up for any reason.
The Regional Ethics Review Board located in Gothenburg gave approval for this study (Dnr: 527 — 08) and the WHO ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence
against women
as applicable to a postal survey were followed.28 For example, a letter was sent to prospective
respondents in advance to inform them about the upcoming survey; this provided them with the opportunity to decline the survey before receiving it.
In the litigation of fault divorce, the term used in the counterclaim to accuse the plaintiff (complainant) of adultery, if initially stated
as a ground for divorce
against the defendant (
respondent).
In PES processing, the survey information from the PES dwelling is matched
against corresponding Census forms for either the same Census dwelling, or for a dwelling nominated by the PES
respondent as a likely address the would have been enumerated at, to determine whether each resident of the PES dwelling was counted in the Census.