Sentences with phrase «as alarmists need»

In fact, it can not really be defined as «cherry picking», much as alarmists need to believe that in order to sleep at night.

Not exact matches

I'm not an alarmist about the future as «Her» presents it, but I do believe more and more people would prefer to have a relationship with a compliant piece of technology than deal with the complications, needs and emotions of a real human being.

Victoria Strauss on Writer Beware Blog Copyright Protection Service: Another One You Don't Need «for the average writer, infringement and piracy aren't nearly as ubiquitous or as damaging as the alarmists and those who would like to profit from alarmism want you to believe.»

How much proof of a connection between CO2 and pine bark beetles do we need before we become legitimately alarmed, rather than have concerns dismissed as needlessly «alarmist»?

We need to not be alarmist about the potential of this alarm, but realize that it is something to be alarmed about if we let this «little» global warming thing go too far... on top of the other reasonably alarming things that are already going on, such as hitting thermal limits for crops, etc..

In other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibrated.

Residents at risk need merely make the same arguments as the climate alarmists re: the precautionary principle and «fairness» — with «geographical» rather than «generational» arguments (that is: «your neighbor's lives will be ruined» rather than «your children's lives will be ruined»)

WHEN you are a man - made global warming alarmist prosecuting your case as «unprecedented», you need to make sure that no recent climate era was as warm or warmer than the present, even if that means having to rewrite the past to fit your theory.

At this point alarmists need to bite the nuclear bullet like Hansen finally and grudgingly suggests as the amercan people wont go back to horse and buggy.

If the CAGW alarmists are genuinely concerned about CAGW (as opposed to using it to push other ideological agendas), they need to enthusiastically advocate removing the barriers to cost - competitive, low - emissions energy.

Anyway with El Niño fading away and possibly a new El Nina with other natural cooing factors coming in to play there is a good chance of another decade or more of «Pausing» or cooling in global temperatures which is itself a stupid concept as it cools and heats in different places of the planet dependent on the local climate conditions an average is meaningless — you really need to dream up some more dire alarmist nonsense to keep your show on the road.

Not that I think the world, on average, needs as much as 15ºC, but it it totally ridiculous that the Alarmists (and Warmists) are aghast at the supposed 0.8 ºC rise since 1880 they think they've measured

Not that I think the world, on average, needs as much as 15ºC, but it it totally ridiculous that the Alarmists (and Warmists) are aghast at the supposed 0.8 ºC rise since 1880 they think they've measured (of which about 0.3 ºC is probably data bias and only about 0.2 ºC is due to human activity).

This needs to be offset against the fact that alarmist mainstream climate science, politically funded as it is, is a largely just a professional fraud designed to boost the political institutions that fund it.