Sentences with phrase «as an expert reviewer»

Dr. Field said that Dr. Pielke would still be able to play an important role as an expert reviewer or contributing author, and added that he hoped Dr. Pielke was also nominated for a role in the next big set of climate assessments, as well.

She's a respected climatologist and director of Texas Tech University's Climate Science Center, and she served as an expert reviewer for the IPCC's previous report, in 2007.

But let's take a look at its IPCC connections... It's chief editor, Anthony J. Broccoli, was a contributing author and expert reviewer for the IPCC's 2007 report... Nathan Gillett, one of its editors, served in four separate AR4 capacities — as a lead author, an expert reviewer for both Working Group 1 and Working Group 2, and as an expert reviewer of the Synthesis Report.

According to the IPCC (see a graphic here), 2,500 people served as expert reviewers on the 2007 report.

If there is further evidence that you can not accept them, or if your intent is to use your access to the review process to challenge them, then we will not be able to continue to treat you as an expert reviewer for the IPCC.

Those not selected to serve as a Lead Author or Review Editor for a given report traditionally serve as an expert reviewer for the particular report.

Thousands of scientists from all over the world participate in the IPCC review process as an expert reviewer.

The drafts will be made public after AR5 is published, the IPCC allows anyone to sign up as an expert reviewer — any fool can become one and some obviously did.

It's unfortunate that the ipcc is not more transparent but we all signed up as expert reviewers knowing the rules.

So I would put breaking of confidences into the same category as being trustworthy and keeping to a promise made, in this case Rawls as an expert reviewer.

Big tent to accommodate paid skeptics: anyone — including the economics grad school dropout — can register as expert reviewer (just as Monckton got official credentials at Doha).

They did this because as expert reviewer's comments which are contrary to IPCC conjecture are simply ignored as was our letter.

Scientists who are nominated but not selected as authors are invited to register as expert reviewers for the report.

Not exact matches

The reviewers chosen by the Department of Health are definitely public health experts, as they should be.

PNNL's climate experts have served as convening lead authors, lead authors, review editors and expert reviewers on IPCC reports.

Also included were other peer - reviewed assessments and research, as well as government statistics, publicly available observations, and advice from expert reviewers.

I am an expert reviewer of AERES («Agence d'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur», France), reviewer of grant proposals for the National Science Foundation (NSF), USA and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), as well as reviewer of several scientific journals.

In a nutshell, «collaborative authoring tools» allow multiple stakeholders on an eLearning project such as course developers, Subject Matter Experts, and reviewers to collaborate and interact with each other simultaneously while working on a project.

Due to the highly technical nature of the Race to the Top Assessment Competition, the Department sent invitations to two groups of individuals to serve as peer reviewers: 1) experts who served as panelists for the Race to the Top Assessment public meetings (these were nominated by the director of the National Academies of Sciences» Board on Testing and Assessment, by the U. S. Department of Education's National Technical Advisory Council chair, and / or by Department experts); and 2) persons experienced as peer reviewers in the Title I review of State assessment systems (all recruited on the basis of assessment expertise).

The nonprofit organization is currently seeking experts to serve as Content Reviewers.

As the market for K — 12 education grows, we should expect to see even more expert reviewers and platforms for user reviews to fill the growing demand for information about education providers.

Our reviewer declares Baker as «an expert in placing the reader into the souls of her characters.

We get one of our expert reviewers to use it as their primary tablet for at least a week to see how it handles real - world use before giving it a final score.

It's our job to provide the expert guidance and advice it takes to give your book its best chance of getting discovered in the marketplace — not only by readers, reviewers and retailers, but by agents and publishers as well.

We have «category experts» such as book bloggers, editors, reviewers, publishers, authors, book club / reading circle members, and others who love a particular category of book.

All articles are peer - reviewed by more than two dozen well - known veterinary experts as board members, authors and reviewers.

I know that you serve (d) as a federal expert reviewer of the EPA's «Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act,» but it was my impression (actually, it is a fact) that the Public Comment period is still wide open on the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of Regulating Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act.

Nonetheless, Dr. Klein staunchly defended the climate panel's procedures, noting, as Dr. Field did, that Dr. Pielke could still serve an important role as a contributing author or an expert reviewer.

Keith Kloor has found a paying gig as a Lomborg imitator, you know, the guy who starts every attack on environmentalists with the affirmation that he used to be an expert reviewer for the IPCC, a member of Greenpeace, a former editor of some the Audobon Society magazine or a lifelong Democrat.

In one ICECAP article (PDF), Gray touts his position as an «expert reviewer» of the IPCC.

IPCC Declares Its Intent to Circumvent Expert Reviewers — Dec. 2012 Hundreds of souls have volunteered to serve as IPCC expert rReviewers — Dec. 2012 Hundreds of souls have volunteered to serve as IPCC expert reviewersreviewers.

The final product achieved the result of deception in full daylight because as David Wojick, IPCC expert reviewer, explained,

Gray often introduces himself as an IPCC expert reviewer.

Moreover, he's involved in the upcoming report as a review editor... As editor James Renwick's bio page makes clear, he was a contributing author to the 2001 IPCC report, a lead author for the 2007 report, and is currently a lead author for AR5... editor Brian Soden was a 2007 contributing author and an expert reviewer who is currently serving as an AR5 lead author... Editor Shang - Ping Xie is currently an AR5 lead author, and editor Michael Alexander was a 2007 IPCC expert reviewer.&raquas a review editor... As editor James Renwick's bio page makes clear, he was a contributing author to the 2001 IPCC report, a lead author for the 2007 report, and is currently a lead author for AR5... editor Brian Soden was a 2007 contributing author and an expert reviewer who is currently serving as an AR5 lead author... Editor Shang - Ping Xie is currently an AR5 lead author, and editor Michael Alexander was a 2007 IPCC expert reviewer.&raquAs editor James Renwick's bio page makes clear, he was a contributing author to the 2001 IPCC report, a lead author for the 2007 report, and is currently a lead author for AR5... editor Brian Soden was a 2007 contributing author and an expert reviewer who is currently serving as an AR5 lead author... Editor Shang - Ping Xie is currently an AR5 lead author, and editor Michael Alexander was a 2007 IPCC expert reviewer.&raquas an AR5 lead author... Editor Shang - Ping Xie is currently an AR5 lead author, and editor Michael Alexander was a 2007 IPCC expert reviewer.»

So he went outside the structure of the IPCC report - writing process to recruit a highly partisan coach («Gene») to provide him some text which would not be shown to the expert reviewers but which would go right into the final draft and be represented as the result of the official IPCC reprt - writing process.

Moreover, as I've explained elsewhere, it still permits employees of activist groups to serve among its pose as «scientific expert reviewers.»

Yet if this really was the conspiracy to keep out dissenting voices which Laframboise hints at, then how does she explain the presence of well known climate science sceptics such as William Kininmonth, Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre who were all given roles as «expert reviewers» in the last IPCC report?

The IPCC insisted to me as an «expert» reviewer of the AR5 draft that we knew the abyssal depth temperatures but would not give me the studies to prove it.

Hundreds of souls have volunteered to serve as IPCC expert reviewers.

As for understanding the issue, the reviewers, who were (supposedly) tree ring experts, had available to them a huge amount of detailed information.

In an echo of the infamous «Climategate» scandal at the University of East Anglia, one of the world's top academic journals rejected the work of five experts after a reviewer privately denounced it as «harmful»...

«For the reviews, the Working Group / Task Force Bureaus are required to seek the participation of reviewers encompassing the range of scientific, technical and socio - economic views, expertise, and geographical representation and it is also required to actively undertake to promote and invite as wide a group of experts as possible.

A Florida - based hurricane expert, Landsea served as a contributing author and expert reviewer on both the 1995 and 2001 editions of the climate bible.

Finally, while the IPCC enlists many expert reviewers, no indication is given as to whether they disagreed with some or all of the material they reviewed.

Since then I have looked more exhaustively using search strings and I am as certain as I can be that AR4 WGI TSU told a lie and that no Expert Reviewer in the 11,000 plus comments asked for the «in - press» deadline to be AFTER the expert review stage.

For added fun, the entry says ``... he claimed to be an IPCC «expert reviewer»...» while linking to a source that damn well lists you as a reviewer on the 3rd AR.

Especially given that, as I said above, anyone who wanted to take part in the review process and give their opinion on the draft documents had the opportunity to do so by applying to become an «expert» reviewer.

Indeed, which is why the IPCC invited people to sign up as «expert reviewers», precisely to provide such comment.

It also seems clear from these papers that having experts in statistics as peer reviewers is a worth - while endeavor; moreso when they know the information about what the data actually is (instead of just numbers).

If those intimately involved with the IPCC as lead authors and expert reviewers are ignored by the IPCC in pursuit of their political objectives it is only fair that those with motivation outside the advancement of scientific knowledge be excluded as reviewers of honest scientific research.