In the writing world, those connections between people who don't really know each other — such
as authors and readers — mean that readers might be more supportive of authors they feel connections with.
I know we're all familiar with it here, and have discussed the pros and cons
as both authors and readers, but I still find that I have to explain it when I bring it up on social media, and there are a lot of misconceptions out there surrounding it.
This system rewards short fiction and punishes longer works,
as authors and readers are more interested in the hearts than they are in reading other people's writing.
As authors and readers, it would be healthy for Amazon to get some strong competition, especially with regard to the ebook market.
This singular essay on our current predicament
as authors and readers (and that means everyone) reveals the new possibilities of world building in serious literature.
If other places want my business
as an author and reader, I'm all ears, but you're going to have to give me a reason that boils down to more than «Amazon is evil.»
As an author and a reader, my goal this year is to find new readers and to find more diverse authors and find more diverse stories.
Suddenly the barrier between
you as an author and your readers is removed.
The steps may be small, and it may not seem like an improvement to everybody, but I appreciate the effort —
both as an author and a reader.
I'm on Goodreads
as an author and a reader, but I know I haven't fully grasped all that's available out there.
It's the fundamental, unwritten and unspoken contract between
you as an author and your readers.
The head of publisher Hachette has claimed ebooks are a failure — but
as an author and a reader, they've completely changed my life
Not exact matches
The answers are rarely so straightforward, a point the
authors make abundantly clear
as they walk
readers through the logic
and evolution of the modern day org.
Charles Duhigg, staff writer for The New York Times
and author of The Power of Habit, answers questions from
readers on Quora on topics ranging from how to develop a blogging habit to what it's like to work
as a journalist.
Lastly, our good friends at the Incrementum Fund, Ronald Stoeferle
and Mark Valek, who our
readers know
as the
authors the annual «In Gold We Trust» report, have released the inaugural issue of their new Crypto Research Report this December in cooperation with Demelza Kelso Hays
and several other contributors.
It was Philip Fisher,
author of the groundbreaking Common Stocks
and Uncommon Profits, who often exhorted his
readers to be cautious about trading in the stock of a company they have known for many years
and come to understand well for one with which they are not
as familiar
as it introduces different types of risk.
Privileged
authors imply privileged
readers, those who are like them with respect to background, experience,
and interests,
and who
as a consequence respond appreciatively to what they have to say.
The issue seems rather to be whether the advantages of such moves outweigh their potential for creating confusion
and for misleading not only
readers but
authors as well.
Given the
author's remarkable learning, most
readers are likely to learn a great deal, especially when he uses Augustine's sermons
as source material; but the captious tone
and prosecutorial zeal of the effort starts to grate
as early
as the first chapter.
Indeed, it can even be read
as a mockery of the whole literary enterprise, pairing dull
and uncomprehending
readers who ploddingly manage to miss the obvious, with clever
authors (both the fictional Vereker
and the actual James) who feel compelled to play the trickster, taunting their
readers with the hint that there is something — indeed, the whole point of it all — that they don't get.
Authors often use an avatar in their fiction stories — it is not Jack that climbs the beanstalk, it is the
author...
and many times, it is the
reader that years later «lives» the story
as they read it.
They allow the poem to be utterly serious when its
author wants it to be (one can not imagine such playfulness being allowed in the climactic visions of Paradiso XXXIII),
and they allow
readers to think that Dante is at least
as sane
as they are.
Exploring some of the lesser - known metaphors
and imagery employed by biblical
authors to describe God, Winner lyrically invites the
reader to imagine God
as clothing, laughter, flame, food, wine,
and a laboring woman.
For the moment, though, it seems
as though Hays's main concern is to convince
readers (
and fellow scholars) that the
authors of the Gospels had high Christologies
and, therefore, that belief in Jesus's divinity is authentic to the first century.
Hays also seems narrow when he encourages
readers to read the OT principally
as narrative
and not
as a «source of oracles, prooftexts, or halakhic regulations,» apparently disqualifying many early Christian
authors who cited Scripture in this way.
Eliade, who was for many years at the University of Chicago, will be familiar to most
readers as the
author of the four - volume A History of Religious Ideas
and numerous other books dealing with religion
and myth in human history.
Many
readers who agree that the U.S. was intended to be a republic
and not an empire will nonetheless disagree with what can only be described
as the
author's radical isolationism, including his restated doubts
as to whether World War II was ours to fight
and his suggestion that Israel is, at least in the long term, a lost cause.
The bulk of academic writing in my discipline is not really writing but a collection of marks on paper put down in response to similar marks put down in response to other marks put down in response to... The
authors of these texts do not have a conception of writing
as an art, or of the need for the imagery, inflection,
and rhythm that hold open the mind of the
reader so that the thought can slip past them into his soul.
I challenge all
readers to read the chapters preceding Isaiah 53 (chapters 41 thru 52)
and you will see for yourself that the
author of Isaiah is referring to the nation of Israel
as the «suffering servant», not to the future messiah,
and therefore, not to Jesus.
And may no noise - making busybody interfere to snatch me out of my carefree content as the author of a little piece, or prevent a kind and benevolent reader from examining it at his leisure, to see if it contains anything that he can u
And may no noise - making busybody interfere to snatch me out of my carefree content
as the
author of a little piece, or prevent a kind
and benevolent reader from examining it at his leisure, to see if it contains anything that he can u
and benevolent
reader from examining it at his leisure, to see if it contains anything that he can use.
Indeed, validity in interpretation can only occur when the otherness of the text,
as it is conveyed by the textual structures of the implied
author and the implied
reader, is realized by the structured acts of the actual
reader.
The more acutely the actual
reader can perceive that «network of response - inviting structures» of the
reader implied by the
author,
and fulfill that role
as designed by the
author, the more adequate the construal of meaning will be.
My case was one in which the
author, editor
and reader are all known entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural
and social context
as the writing
and editing;
and the
reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D.
and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.
In interpretation, the
reader entertains propositions whose logical subjects include entities in the
reader's (
and author's) past world; only
as such do they become components of the interpreter's «forms of subjectivity»; so there is always an element of objective reference.
Most of the current hermeneutical options tend toward reduction or exclusion in the act of interpretation,
as when they utilize either structuralist or «historical - critical» methods, focus on either sociological data or «ideas,»
and locate «meaning» in the internal «world» of the text, or in the external reality to which it refers, or in the
author's intention, or iii the
reader's response (see OTIPP 1).
Like its predecessors, his new book is layered with statistical quirks
and story twists,
as the
author crafts a compelling
and ambitious argument designed to challenge
and even change the
reader's view of the world.
Building upon his understanding that written texts can burst the world of the
author,
and indeed that of the
reader as well,
and upon his understanding that different genres accomplish this in different ways, Ricoeur comes to his understanding of «the world of the text» or, in other citations, «the world in front of the text,» by which he means «the... world intended beyond the text
as its reference.
Five times in this letter, the
author warns his
readers what could happen to them if they reject Christianity
and return to their old way of living
as Jews.
Timeless Cities: An Architect's Reflections on Renaissance Italy calls to mind Berger's caution because the governing ambition of the book» though expressed sotto voce» is to challenge its
readers to promote
and build cities that aspire to equal if not surpass the most beautiful cities of the Western world»
and because its
author, David Mayernik, is
as aware
as anyone that the culture
and institutions of modernity are not currently conducive to the creation of such cities.
To situate Mapplethorpe, et al., within the ranks of Catholicism requires Heartney to stretch terms such
as «Catholic»
and «sacramental» into forms devoid of theological meaning,
and Heartney's tendentious commentary on art requires from the
reader a measure of generosity that the
author never extends to her ideological foes.
Despite the
author's idiosyncratic
and condescending substitution of nicknames for Polish surnames he assumes
readers will not be able to keep straight, the story is fast - paced
and keeps in play the action in Warsaw
as well
as the diplomatic dramas in London, Moscow,
and Washington.
As author of over 70 books with worldwide sales of over 85 million,
and inspiration to
readers of all ages, his passing is an immense loss.
As you can guess from the foregoing description, Lunch Money is meant to be a highly practical resource for managers of school food services departments,
and it is they, not lay
readers, who are addressed directly by the
author in this book.
Here at Little Hearts our
readers have BIG hearts full of love for little people
and have joined together to Give the Gift of Gentle Parenting
and Give the Gift of Life, raising funds to donate gentle parenting books
and resources in bulk to hospitals for new parent bags, to children's hospitals,
and to crisis family centers
and also to help with
author L.R.Knost's medical expenses
as she battles a rare neuroendocrine cancer.
The
author reminds
readers, «The ability to handle airway obstruction
and to ventilate with a bag
and a mask are equally
as important, if not more important, than the ability to intubate.
Thirdly: If a book doesn't acknowledge point number two then it is likely to be causing guilt or shame to be felt by those who don't agree with the experiences of the
author and is therefore one which I would see
as causing
readers to lose their own sense of self.
The
author comes across to the
reader as an intelligent, hard working
and rather detached politician who was seriously committed to achieve great changes in wider education policy to help the disadvantaged.
And of course the big take away is,
as the
author says, we have to be very careful when we are changing the experience for our
readers.
For instance, a new politics blog called Swampland features Ana Marie Cox
and Joe Klein, among other
authors,
and uses at least a few standard blog features such
as reader comments
and permalinks.
All too often
readers will try to pigeon hole a blog's
author as Democrat, Republican, conservative or liberal leaning,
and so on
and so forth.