Fortunately, there are ways to remove crop residues for use
as biofuels while increasing soil fertility.
Not exact matches
Icahn's efforts last year to overhaul the
biofuels program -
while acting
as an adviser to Trump on regulatory issues - drew scrutiny from federal investigators after lawmakers said it raised ethical concerns.
While biofuels are better in the long run, the study says they won't meet a standard set in a 2007 energy law to qualify
as renewable fuel.
Large
biofuel firms like Abengoa Bioenergy U.S., Iberdrola U.S.A., Pacific Ethanol, and POET joined the pledge,
while some of the biggest agriculture firms — like Cargill and Monsanto (MON)-- did
as well.
«Coles also recycles chicken fat and doughnut fat
as animal feed, low - grade industrial lubricants and
biofuels,
while organic food waste is recycled
as compost, animal feed or converted to fertiliser or gas by Earthpower.
Federal investigators have issued subpoenas for information on Carl Icahn's efforts to change
biofuel policy
while serving
as an informal adviser to Trump, according to regulatory filings.
While the Air Force experiments with camelina - based
biofuels, the engineers here have tested chicken fat
as a jet fuel.
For example, the metabolically engineered microbes that are sometimes used to produce
biofuels and chemicals are currently subject to genetically modified organism (GMO) regulations,
while the molecules they produce are subject to chemical regulations such
as the Toxic Substances Control Act in the United States and the regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) in Europe.
While laying out several important wild cards (expanded farming of
biofuels among them), Ausubel and his co-authors see a reasonable prospect for conserving, and restoring, forests and other stressed terrestrial ecosystems even
as humanity exerts an ever greater influence on the planet.
But
as things stand,
while there are many people working on next - generation
biofuels that could meet the criteria above, the vast majority of the
biofuels made in the U.S. are not particularly green.
While biodiesel from used restaurant grease is great and would ideally be of a scale that would use all such waste, I have yet to see how
biofuels will work well on a large scale
as an industry in a global market.
While it is all fine and dandy to promote alternative energy sources such
as windfarms and
biofuels, I think it's safe to say that those types of technologies are not able to support American's huge demand for energy.
A recent
biofuel program actually wiped out jobs rather than creating them
as intended,
while costing taxpayers a lot of money.
Naturally, (according to the FT, the Green party in Finland and Greenpeace in France still campaign against nuclear energy,
while in Sweden the FT reports («The inconvenient truth about an oil - free society») the Greens have got the government to plan to log 1.15 mn hectares a year of its 20 mn hectares of forest for use
as biofuel to reduce current dependence on oilfired energy and transport.
As noted earlier, eliminating
biofuel mandates and subsidies
while uprooting the false assumption of carbon - neutrality from EPA's Clean Power Plan would do more to reduce the unfair advantages of bioenergy than even the most inclusively - designed carbon tax.
Consequently, the policy encourages the use of better
biofuels, biogas, and electricity,
while disincentivizing dirtier sources, such
as tar sands.
[3] Helioculture allows for brackish water or graywater, nonindustrial waste water from sources such
as baths and washing machines, [4] to be used,
while traditional
biofuels such
as cellulosic ethanol require fresh water.
While novel
biofuels research has produced simple but effective uses for agricultural waste, possibly in China, perhaps most nations will see proven solar and wind technologies
as more progressive.
This is all a great shame because it distracts readers from the real value of the book, in which Zehner asks the question: «Why do the options of wind, solar, and
biofuels flow from our minds so freely
as solutions to our various energy dilemmas,
while conservation and walkable neighborhoods do not?
This is not only incorrect, but ironic, given that developing countries that use wood for fuel that leads to deforestation is counted
as contributing to climate change,
while Europe and most states in the US count emissions from «modern
biofuels»
as carbon neutral.»
The result is that the two most positive provisions of the energy bill — a clean energy mandate and a tax package reining in handouts for fossil fuels and promoting clean energy — are being removed
while detrimental provisions, such
as a radical five-fold increase in unsustainable
biofuel use, remain.
Meeting the new goals would require shippers to significantly increase fuel efficiency and to shift to low - and zero - carbon fuels such
as biofuels or perhaps hydrogen,
while adopting new propulsion technologies, some of them still unproven.
Only last month we saw headlines from two studies arguing that land use changes may nix any environmental benefits of many
biofuels,
while they have also been singled out
as a contributing factor in the looming food crisis.
John McCain —
while paying lip service to greater use of wind, solar, geothermal, and
biofuels — clearly and consistently believes that in the near future (certainly in the time he would be in office) greater reliance on nuclear power
as well
as increased offshore oil drilling is the path to increased energy independence in the United States.
While the JCs call for lower pay and benefits, they pay
as much
as $ 150 per gallon for «green» jet fuel to prop up left wing campaign supporters and their insane business scams that bilk taxpayers over non-existent man - made global warming with «green»
biofuels that are so expensive nobody can buy them but the government.
The report predicts that world demand for crops — whether for food, livestock feed or
biofuels — will double in the next 50 years,
while natural resources necessary to agriculture are becoming scarce or degraded due to the impacts of global climate change.According to the report, areas of focus include sub-Saharan Africa, with the report indicating that farm subsidies for commodities such
as cotton and oilseeds in wealthier countries need to be changed
as they force prices down for small farmers in developing nations.