Forests act
as carbon sinks because plants take in carbon dioxide — and some scientists think they can even boost that ability.
Not exact matches
The Globe «s Jeffrey Simpson offers Canadian politicians plaudits for the following good deeds: Ed Stelmach's decision to fund research into
carbon capture and storage; Dalton McGuinty's decision to protect the boreal forest (
because «untouched forests are wonderful
carbon sinks») and to sign on to the Western Climate Initiative; Stephen Harper for agreeing to pour money into Ontario infrastructure; and the premiers for finally agreeing «that within one sovereign country, there ought to be
as few obstacles to the movement of people and capital
as possible.»
The approach ranked
as the study's least viable strategy, in part
because less than a quarter of the algae could be expected to eventually
sink to the bottom of the ocean, which would be the only way that
carbon would be sequestered for a long period of time.
As a result, roughly 50 percent of the captured
carbon sinks through the so - called twilight zone there — perhaps
because it is heavier and therefore descends faster — compared with just 20 percent in the balmier waters off Hawaii, which support smaller life - forms, researchers report this week in Science.
Because the algae take in three times the CO2 to produce a single ton of ethylene, the process acts
as a
carbon sink.
Because carbon cycle processes such
as photosynthesis fractionate the heavy isotope 13C from the lighter 12C, isotopic analysis can usually be used to «trace» sources and
sinks of
carbon.
The process has dire consequences for climate,
because forests like the Amazon serve
as essential
carbon sinks as long
as they are left intact.
That may seem a long time away, but
because carbon dioxide piles up in the atmosphere over time,
as water blasting from a faucet accumulates in a
sink, avoiding the two - degrees tipping point would require slashing emissions starting now, the IPCC said.
Some regions may even shift from being a
carbon sink to being an atmospheric
carbon dioxide source, 50,51,52 though large uncertainties exist, such
as whether projected disturbances to forests will be chronic or episodic.31 Midwest forests are more resilient to forest
carbon losses than most western forests
because of relatively high moisture availability, greater nitrogen deposition (which tends to act
as a fertilizer), and lower wildfire risk.50, 51,53
And
because mangrove forests are
carbon sinks, «mangroves also emit
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, and naturally, the balance is positive — unless they are heavily degraded, such
as from aquaculture, and then they will become
carbon emitters.»
That's unexpected
because carbon dioxide is increasing so fast in the atmosphere that you would expect the
sink to increase
as well,» says Le Quéré.
Because a large flux of CO2 is constantly being assimilated into the world
as forests via photosynthesis, cutting off its return pathway to the atmosphere forms an effective
carbon sink....
The Amazon forest acts
as a
carbon sink,
because trees suck the greenhouse gas CO2 out of the atmosphere
as they grow, during photosynthesis, converting this to plant matter including bark, wood and roots.
Because these lands play such a vital role
as carbon sinks, it's no surprise that their destruction is partly responsible for the emissions from land use changes that add up to nearly 18 percent of the total global warming effect.
Restoring degraded forests has come to be recognized
as perhaps just
as critical to climate efforts
as stopping deforestation,
because of how reforestation efforts can enhance forests» role
as a
carbon sink.