In addition, there is a specific need to support children who live in poverty,
as children in poor families are twice as likely to be at risk for developmental, behavioral, and social delays as children in families earning 200 percent or more of the federal poverty line (Children's Defense Fund 2014).
Not exact matches
As a
child, I often filled
in these blanks with my very active imagination, and my
poor mother would have to refute yet another wild story of mine about how I'd come to live with my
family.
For over 50 years, regardless of the political environment or changes
in the economy, GLIDE has stood with the most vulnerable, including
poor people, those with illness, people of color, immigrants,
as well
as all
families and
children fleeing war and oppression.
1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent
in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women,
children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women /
children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes
in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics
in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought
as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the
poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your
family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the
poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray
in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent
in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns
families against each other, those that love
family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against
children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your
family, you are an infidel)
And these days, unless
children from
poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up
in families in the lowest income quintile (with household income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have just a one
in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket
as adults.
In far too many school districts, there are students who would qualify for free meals, except for the fact that their family never fills out the form, either because they forget, or they don't understand that it is important, or (more often) the child is too embarrassed to self - identify as poor in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it in at schoo
In far too many school districts, there are students who would qualify for free meals, except for the fact that their
family never fills out the form, either because they forget, or they don't understand that it is important, or (more often) the
child is too embarrassed to self - identify
as poor in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it in at schoo
in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it
in at schoo
in at school.
Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and
family members,
as well
as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be
poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such
as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations
Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation
in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding
in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available
as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.
The freeze will hit the
poorest third
in society the hardest and cause working
families with
children lose
as much
as # 490 a year
in child benefit and tax credits.
This IFS research puts the Budget's regressive impact beyond doubt: the
poorest will be hit more than many of the richest
in cash terms let alone
as a percentage;
poor and middle income
families with
children lose out more than any other household types and the very
poorest families with
children lose more than any other groups — with 5 per cent of their total income being cut.
Cahill says he wants to do more to protect
children at Charter Schools, who often come from the
poorest families in the state, and says he sees it
as «the civil rights issue of our time».
In a population - based Canadian study of
children with epilepsy, each of whom had access to universal health care, those from
poor families had the same medical course and remission rate
as their wealthier counterparts, but they had a less favorable social outcome
as adults.
«
As the national debate on immigration has grown stronger, including immigrants» use of many social services, some have argued that the reason for the high
child poverty rate has mostly been due to the large number of
children in low - skilled,
poor immigrant
families,» Joo said.
NCCP defines a
poor household
as one where incomes are below the federal poverty threshold (i.e., $ 24,036 for a
family of four with two
children in 2015).
Out of all the
children, boys,
children from larger
families,
as well
as those with more cognitive, motor or behaviour problems, and
poorer parent - infant relationships
in infancy, had fewer friends, met them less and were less accepted by them.
Steve Martin (Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Lonely Guy) stars
as Navin Johnson, a white man -
child living
as the adopted son of a
poor black Mississippi sharecropping
family, and though he doesn't quite know it, his «whiteness»,
in both skin color and interests, has definitely made him the «black sheep» of the
family.
Fortitude also forms the mortar of her performance
in Mira Nair's Queen of Katwe
as Nakku Harriet, the Mother Courage of a
family of hungry, unschooled
children in a teeming,
poor, ramshackle township
in Uganda where skyscrapers stand
in the hazy distance like the Emerald City of Oz.
Better known
as the Coleman Report after its first author, the eminent sociologist James Coleman, the document provided abundant evidence of large gaps
in reading and mathematics skills between black
children and white
children and between
children from
poor families and those from more affluent
families.
• Black
children were three times
as likely to live
in poor families as white
children in 2015.
But they were surprised to find that
children in poor families who benefitted from increased income scored about the same
as children who were not
poor to begin with.
Wanting to see for himself, Mike visits his local elementary school
in Takoma Park, Maryland, where «the
children of übereducated whites» are
in the same classrooms
as poor blacks, black middle - class
families» and «
poor immigrant
children from Latin America, Ethiopia, and Eritrea.»
Tuition scholarships for
poor families are heavily oversubscribed
as are charter schools
in areas where officials restrict the size and number of charter schools despite the many
families that desire to enroll their
children.
Yet the GEM Report shows that
children from the
poorest 20 % of
families are eight times
as likely to be out of school
as children from the richest 20 %
in lower - middle - income countries.
As a result, it has been suggested that wealthy
families who use private tutors for this purpose should be taxed
in order to help
poorer children have access to the same help.
According to Teach for America spokesperson Takirra Winfield, the program has three major components: discussions on the «history of inequity
in the United States»; teaching recruits to view
poor children's
families and neighborhoods
as «assets» to academic achievement, not liabilities (a concept borrowed from African American educational theorists like Lisa Delpit and Gloria Ladson - Billings); and introducing corps members to classroom management tactics.
In a very large majority of cases, the data used to determine which students are from low - income families at this stage are not the same as the Census data used to identify school - age children in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEA
In a very large majority of cases, the data used to determine which students are from low - income
families at this stage are not the same
as the Census data used to identify school - age
children in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEA
in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEAs.
As Bush strategist Karl Rove explained
in his book Courage and Consequence: «When Bush said education was the civil rights struggle of our time or that the absence of an accountability system
in our schools meant black, brown,
poor, and rural
children were getting left behind, it gave listeners important information about his respect and concern for every
family and deepened the impression that he was a different kind of Republican whom suburban voters... could be proud to support.»
However, research by economists Stephen Cameron and James Heckman suggests that the real problem may be that
poor children simply don't do
as well
in school, a somewhat discouraging conclusion since sending
families bigger checks to help with college is arguably easier than improving academic achievement
in elementary and secondary schools.
In 1968 Michael Katz published a revision of his Harvard doctoral thesis, The Irony of Early School Reform, arguing that public schooling had not always been
as beneficial for American
children, particularly ones from
poor families,
as it had been traditionally portrayed.
Because
children in poorer families are more likely to experience
poor - quality
child care, the data suggest that high - quality
child care might serve
as an important early childhood intervention for
children living
in poverty.»
Both tests are designed to fail the vast majority of
children and are particularly discriminatory to
children who face challenges such
as those who come from
poorer families, those who are not fluent
in the English language and those who need special education services.
It shows that
in the US,
as in other countries,
children from better educated, wealthier
families will achieve better results than
poorer children.
The State Department of Education,
in collusion with non-educator administrators such
as Steven Adamowski, have handed Achievement First millions
in public tax payer dollars to experiment on
children from
poor families.
As the gap between the richest and poorest families in America has grown, an increasing number of families are unable to enroll their children in enrichment activities, which researchers identified as crucial to a student's success in the classroo
As the gap between the richest and
poorest families in America has grown, an increasing number of
families are unable to enroll their
children in enrichment activities, which researchers identified
as crucial to a student's success in the classroo
as crucial to a student's success
in the classroom.
While Coates doesn't touch on education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case for why reformers (especially increasingly erstwhile conservatives
in the movement) must go back to embracing accountability measures and a strong federal role
in education policymaking that, along with other changes
in American society, are key to helping
children from
poor and minority households (
as well
as their
families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
Some see Wilkinsburg's plight
as evidence of a broken school funding system that shortchanges
children from
poor families, while others see it
as an argument for investing
in charter schools instead of trying to turn around dysfunctional school systems.
Research shows that
children from
poor families start school substantially behind
children from more advantaged backgrounds
in vocabulary, knowledge of the world, social skills, and pre-academic content such
as letter recognition, all of which are strongly predictive of later school success.
He goes to school with
children who have parents that don't qualify for free or reduced lunch, however, this,
in most cases, means that they are
families who make enough to get by and NOT that they truly «less
poor»
as you call them.
Families in districts with majorities of
poor black and Latino
children are increasingly pushing back against educator recruitment groups like Teach for America, scorning their efforts
as education tourism for privileged Ivy Leaguers.
It may be contentious to state that many American
children, whether they come from
poor, middle - income, or wealthy
families, do not have adequate access to high - quality educational opportunities and,
as a result, fall short of achieving their academic potential while
in school.
There has, however, also been evidence
in recent years that separate (often charter) schools can change the trajectory of the lives of gifted,
poor children —
as long
as families are willing to enroll them, get them to school regularly, and tolerate a demanding academic schedule.
Brinig:
As we discuss
in our book, the loss of Catholic schools is a «triple whammy» for our cities: When Catholic schools close, (1)
poor kids lose schools with a track record of educating disadvantaged
children at a time when they need them more desperately than ever; (2)
poor neighborhoods that are already overwhelmed by disorder and crime lose critical and stabilizing community institutions — institutions that our research suggests suppress crime and disorder; and, (3) middle - class
families must look elsewhere for educational options for their kids, leading many to migrate to suburbs with high - performing public schools.
Yet education traditionalists, ivory tower civil rights activists, and dyed -
in - the - wool progressives, still stuck on integration
as school reform, would rather criticize charters for supposedly perpetuating segregation (even though most urban communities largely consist of one race or class) than embrace a tool for helping
poor and minority
families give their
children opportunities for high - quality education.
«10 Delise, based upon her study of fatal attacks over the past five decades, has identified Â
poor ownership / management practices involved
in the overwhelming majority of these incidents: owners obtaining dogs, and maintaining them
as resident dogs outside of the household for purposes other than
as family pets (i.e. guarding / protection, fighting, intimidation / status); owners failing to humanely contain, control and maintain their dogs (chained dogs, loose roaming dogs, cases of abuse / neglect); owners failing to knowledgably supervise interaction between
children and dogs; and owners failing to spay or neuter resident dogs not used for competition, show, or
in a responsible breeding program.4
The agency's goal was to document efforts to alleviate the economic problems facing the nation,
as well
as the effects of the Great Depression on struggling
families as demonstrated
in this portrait of a
poor mother and
child in Arkansas.
Scientists long feared a great population boom that would stress food production, but population growth is slowing and should plateau by 2050
as family size
in almost all
poorer countries falls to roughly 2.2
children per
family.
Organized 4 successful project service the community such
as helping
children with cancer and, a small project for
poor families to increase their income and help them
in medical expenses.
In addition, numerous social factors such
as family conflict and
poor child - rearing practices — while not causing the condition — may complicate the course of ADHD and its treatment.
Previous research from the former waves of the Bergen
Child Study (a longitudinal study nested within youth@hordaland) has also identified psychological problems
as a predictor for non - participation.70 As the current sample may be skewed towards better socioeconomic status and psychological health, the results may be a conservative estimate of the number of adolescents growing up in poor families and their associated mental health problem
as a predictor for non - participation.70
As the current sample may be skewed towards better socioeconomic status and psychological health, the results may be a conservative estimate of the number of adolescents growing up in poor families and their associated mental health problem
As the current sample may be skewed towards better socioeconomic status and psychological health, the results may be a conservative estimate of the number of adolescents growing up
in poor families and their associated mental health problems.
A number of factors have been associated with
poor school attendance, including low socioeconomic status and low levels of parental education.1 3
In Australia, Indigenous young people have been identified to have significantly worse attendance and school retention when compared with non-Indigenous children, and it has been suggested that this is a key driver of the gap in academic outcomes between non-Indigenous and Indigenous young people.6 — 8 In addition Moore and McArthur9 identified that maternal and family risks, such as family instability, mental illness and drug and alcohol issues, are associated with reduced child participation in schoo
In Australia, Indigenous young people have been identified to have significantly worse attendance and school retention when compared with non-Indigenous
children, and it has been suggested that this is a key driver of the gap
in academic outcomes between non-Indigenous and Indigenous young people.6 — 8 In addition Moore and McArthur9 identified that maternal and family risks, such as family instability, mental illness and drug and alcohol issues, are associated with reduced child participation in schoo
in academic outcomes between non-Indigenous and Indigenous young people.6 — 8
In addition Moore and McArthur9 identified that maternal and family risks, such as family instability, mental illness and drug and alcohol issues, are associated with reduced child participation in schoo
In addition Moore and McArthur9 identified that maternal and
family risks, such
as family instability, mental illness and drug and alcohol issues, are associated with reduced
child participation
in schoo
in school.
Because poverty predicts risk for school adjustment problems, low achievement, crime, and other problem behaviors, the effects of the full intervention on
children from
poor families were investigated using logistic and linear regression methods
as appropriate, with terms for intervention and free lunch eligibility
as main effects and an interaction term for intervention by participation
in the free lunch program.