Sentences with phrase «as claims history»

When determining Home insurance cost, Insurance companies base their pricing on many factors such as the claims history of the house as well as the neighbouring claims index.

Trusted Choice agents will look at your home's size, location and age as well as your claims history and credit score.

It's based on other risk factors and your location, as well as claims history.

Liability car insurance rates are obviously based on the level of coverage you choose to take on, but also on other factors such as your claim history and your driving record.

Some of these factors have nothing to do with you at all and are things you have no control over, such as the claim history of the address you are renting at.

Not exact matches

Asana claims to be one of the fastest - growing software - as - a-service companies in history, with more than 140,000 customers.)

Dr. Michael Hudson joins Double Down to talk about the economic reality behind the Trump voter and about whether or not, as it is claimed, Hillary Clinton is the «most progressive» candidate in Democratic history.

the history of this epic Facebook privacy fail is even longer than the under - disclosed events of 2015 suggest — i.e. when Facebook claims it found out about the breach as a result of investigations by journalists.

That's laughable too, but he is correct in claiming that science has no real answers as to why we're here or why every culture in history has had a belief in a mysterious, unseen, omnipotent being.

A prolepsis, as he uses the notion, is simply a claim staked out in history, which, when and if history is fulfilled, will be verified or falsified, and which is of such a nature that those who in the meantime have accepted it will all along have been living appropriately to the truth that will at the end be discovered.

It does come as a result of actually reading the religious books, and the manufactured history it claims.

That is, what appears to some solely as a new chapter in Jewish history (and the history of the Middle East), makes a claim on the Christian construal of history.

Then they brand atheism as a religion, and claim the history and science taught in schools is atheistic.

Besides, there are far to many crosses in history such as paintings, architectural works etc to prove legitimacy in these militant atheist claims.

Perhaps the most common use of the language of parental rights is to protect the possessive claims of those whose history of abuse or neglect as parents has largely undermined their claim to the title.

He moves from a belief central in Western monotheism, that God acts in history, to claim that American foreign policy can — and should — be viewed as an instrument God uses to realize God's ultimate plan.

Messiah Complex is Brand's tongue - in - cheek attempt to claim his place among the great revolutionary messiah figures of global history Che Guevara, Gandhi, and, of course, Jesus men he refers to as his personal heroes.

This selective «colorblindness» is a mighty convenient approach to race in America for white people, for it allows us to paper over America's troubled (and decidedly anti-Christian) history, to discount racism as a thing of the past for which we are no longer responsible, and to ignore persistent racial injustices like mass incarceration, police brutality, voting rights issues, white flight, and economic inequality, all while consistently benefiting from an oppressive system we claim we can not even see.

Many of the authors take seriously Francis Fukuyama's claim that, with the elimination of communism as a social and political possibility, human history has reached a sort of terminus.

It, to me, is similar to claiming the name of Christ — no matter what it means to you as an individual, by claiming that name, you are connecting yourself to a massive, rich history of people who all have the name of Christ in common.

«42 It does not «disclose» history or existence, as Keen would claim, allowing us to return to Eden.

Even if the date and place of Jesus» birth may be uncertain, the claim that God entered human history is central to traditional Christian belief, as the British poet Sir John Betjeman (1906 - 84) indicated in his poem «Christmas»:

As we attempted to outline in our last editorial, when we search the pages of human history we do find such a line of spiritual and religious tradition that not only claims the direct authority of the Absolute Transcendent One whose name is «I Am Who I Am», but is also coherently developmental in doctrine and in providence across millennia.

Hence a radical faith claims our contemporary condition as an unfolding of the body of Christ, an extension into the fullness of history of the self - emptying of God.

The claim is also at once self - pitying and self - congratulatory: self - pitying be-cause it says, «Our time is worse than any other time; nobody else in history has suffered as we are suffering, and that is one of the ways we know the end is near.»

Again, theologians who are persuaded of their usefulness in conveying theological meaning to the contemporary mind may have gone so far as to claim emergent evolution to be a theological symbol by which biblical events of history as well as subsequent doctrinal formulations may be explicated.

I will not engage in the lazy arrogance of claiming history is on our side; but I will go so far as to say that in the long term all past evidence suggests that it is certainly not on the side of those who brook no dissent, ignore all counter-evidence, and demonize all opposition.

As neil degrasse tyson pointed out, each of our great mathematicians and scientists throughout the centuries reached their limit and declared God did it... only to have the next guy push though that barrier, reach their own limit... and claim the same... This lady has the benefit of history and science at her finger tips, and judging by her credentials is no stranger to the scientific process, and still fell into the same trap...

Otherwise, you're as erroneous as the rest of the people who «claim» to be Christian but have no idea what that means, what the history is, what the rules are and what is expected of them.

Systematic Theology can be read as a much fuller account of the vision first put forward in Revelation as History twenty - five years before: Eschatology remains the key theological locus; Jesus continues to be understood as the anticipatory realization of the final reign of God over all things; Christianity is rational, though this claim is somewhat chastened.

There are writers, such as Allan Bloom in THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND, who have actually claimed that the End of History is already here for sophisticated young Americans, and without our any biotechnological help.

You can neither prove nor deny the truth claims of Christianity but I will not sit idly by as you attempt to rewrite history.

It is unfortunate that some Jewish scholars still pose an antithesis between Christian and Jewish positions on this issue, claiming that Christian theology conceives of redemption exclusively as an event in the spiritual and private realm of a person's inner life, but unrelated to history.

Christians have a history of trying to claim things that pre-date them as their own.

We are, then, flatly denied the capacity to judge current history and arrive at the conclusion that «This or that is its true meaning»... What we are permitted to know of history comes to this: «This, in one way or another, is history's challenge to me; this is its claim on me; and so this is its meaning as far as I am concerned.»

In this history, he claimed, we learn to see historical conceptions of God as symbolic representations of the human drama of cultural development.

While claiming that the whole of creation has as its very structure the Sabbath principle, Barth qualifies this statement by suggesting that creation (through its culmination in the Sabbath rest) paints also to redemptive history (to covenant) and to the final consummation of the same.

What about all the other gods, all the other religions they make the exact same claim as you without any proof and history has shown over and over again those gods didn't exist either.

His machine is just as much an abstraction as he claims the materialists» matter is: an arbitrary, idealized device with absolutely identical interchangeable parts, with no history and no determinate future, completely subject to adjustment and transformation by its human inventors and users.

There is also a fifth, more detached, philosophical way of looking at these issues without appealing to «direct historical influence» as if it were some sort of causal connection as Lowe claims it is.7 Of course the fourth line and fifth lines are outside ordinary present - day historiographical research, excepting undergraduates in general education courses (who seem inevitably to find, in spite of the odds in a fair - sized library, Russell's History of Western Philosophy first, and then cite it liberally).

He puts into question all forms of taken - for - granted religion whether it is Buddhism, Hinduism, mysticism, or secular «eschatologies» such as Marxism that claims there is a deterministic linear redemptive course to history.

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

The CCP stirs the nationalistic emotions of the people by contesting Japan over issues such as: the disputed territorial claims with China: its writing of history that omits Japanese atrocities in its invasion of China, and in recent visits by its leaders to Japan's Yasukuni shrine which honors national heroes including convicted war criminals.2

Where depth and complexity are taken seriously, in speaking of history as in speaking of physical realities, something other than appeal to logic, or even to the claims of observation, is involved.

But the process of ecumenical and interreligious dialogue that Pope Benedict XVI has repeatedly endorsed may cause participants to question whether any canonical story of violence — such as the conquest narratives in Joshua and Judges, or functionally equivalent texts in the history of Islam — may legitimately be claimed to offer a religious warrant for continued violence in today's world.

However, when discussing the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, Wheeler maintains that whether «Jesus Christ's divine - human unity is the sole member of its class, as evangelical Christians would typically claim,» or is «a paradigmatic member of a class with multiple members» as Whiteheadians contend, this crucial unity can be construed more fundamentally by those in both groups as an example of a systemic change of the God - world relationship happening once in the history of humanity globally (105).

They claim that history has shown that the libertarian or laissez - faire approach allows markets to increase wealth, promote innovation and optimize production — at the same time as regulating itself flawlessly.

This knowledge gives a kind of certainty such as is possible in the realm of history and freedom, that is as a claim to make freedom itself a binding norm.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

Such a claim is only barely comprehensible as history.