Several studies, including our own, clearly demonstrate that teacher evaluation systems that are based on a number of components, such
as classroom observation scores and test - score gains, are already much more effective at predicting future teacher performance than paper credentials and years of experience.
Not exact matches
State lawmakers earlier this year agreed to a package of education policy changes that linked test
scores to evaluations
as well
as in -
classroom observation and made it more difficult for teachers to obtain tenure.
But in recent weeks, Cuomo has indicated he will begin to emphasize a new direction in education after a legislative session that saw yet more changes to the state's teacher evaluation system that linked performance reviews to tenure
as well
as student test
scores and in -
classroom observation.
After extensive research on teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1)
classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such
as the Framework for Teaching or the
Classroom Assessment
Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test
scores over multiple years.
The question is whether teachers who were dismissed for low evaluation
scores in the districts we studied would have received substantively different evaluation
scores if their
classroom observation scores had been adjusted
as we recommend.
Performance - based accountability evaluates teachers» effectiveness through a comprehensive, research - based system that combines such criteria
as position responsibilities,
classroom observations, and students» gains in test
scores.
(Just
as we did with
classroom observations, to avoid generating a spurious correlation between student survey responses and achievement
scores for the same group of students, we estimated the correlation across different
classrooms of students taught by the same teacher.)
Cincinnati provided us with records of each
classroom observation conducted between the 2000 — 01 and 2008 — 09 school years, including the
scores that evaluators assigned for each specific practice element
as a result of that
observation.
While this approach contrasts starkly with status quo «principal walk - through» styles of class
observation, its use is on the rise in new and proposed evaluation systems in which rigorous
classroom observation is often combined with other measures, such
as teacher value - added based on student test
scores.
For example, the publisher of the SAT10, used in the current Policy, says that for student promotion decisions, test
scores «should be just one of the many factors considered and probably should receive less weight than factors such
as teacher
observation, day - to - day
classroom performance, maturity level, and attitude.
The manual for the SAT - 10, which CPS used last year to retain students, states that test
scores «should be just one of the many factors considered and probably should receive less weight than factors such
as teacher
observation, day - to - day
classroom performance, maturity level, and attitude» — just the kind of information in report cards.
Optimism, test
scores on the rise at English High School November 30, 2015 In a fourth - floor
classroom, students diligently scrawled notes across lined pages one recent morning
as social studies teacher Frank Swoboda explained the role of politics in economic development, peppering his lesson with
observations from students... read more.
In only 3 of the 8 models presented is there any statistically significant relationship between either
classroom observations or student surveys and test
score gains (I'm excluding the 2 instances were they report p <.1
as statistically significant).
I mentioned earlier that a teacher with high value - added and low
classroom observation scores (High - Low) is unlikely to be equally effective
as one with low value - added and high
classroom observations scores (Low - High).
Using multiple measures such
as teacher evaluations,
classroom observation and student test
scores, TNTP rated about half the teachers in their 10th year or beyond
as below «effective» in core instructional practices such
as developing students» critical thinking.
They then use
as an example the 0.044 (p < 0.05) coefficient (
as related to more
classroom observations with explicit feedback tied to the Common Core) and explain that «a difference of one standard deviation in the
observation and feedback index was associated with an increase of 0.044 standard deviations in students» mathematics test
scores — roughly the equivalent of 1.4 scale
score points on the PARCC assessment and 4.1 scale
score points on the SBAC.»
As Dropout Nation noted last week in its report on teacher evaluations, even the most - rigorous classroom observation approaches are far less accurate in identifying teacher quality than either value - added analysis of test score data or even student surveys such as the Tripod system used by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as part of its Measures of Effective Teaching projec
As Dropout Nation noted last week in its report on teacher evaluations, even the most - rigorous
classroom observation approaches are far less accurate in identifying teacher quality than either value - added analysis of test
score data or even student surveys such
as the Tripod system used by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as part of its Measures of Effective Teaching projec
as the Tripod system used by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
as part of its Measures of Effective Teaching projec
as part of its Measures of Effective Teaching project.
The program relies heavily on
classroom observation and mentoring, but also uses AGT
scores - part of an evaluation method known
as a «value - added model» - to measure pupil progress.
No state bases more than 50 percent of a teacher's evaluation on student performance
scores (see the infographic on p. 4), and many incorporate multiple additional measures, such
as classroom observations, student writing and artwork, teacher lesson plans, peer review, student reflections and feedback, and participation in professional development (Shakman et al., 2012).
That will likely change this school year
as the Tennessee report cards begin to reflect
scores from the state's new teacher evaluation system, which includes multiple
classroom observations, said Miller.
One of the key areas of congruence throughout the state data from Florida, Tennessee, and Georgia is the generally high
scores given to teachers during
classroom observations, a finding that comes right
as new research is revealing clues about the properties of such
observations and how they are shaped by the norms within schools.
As shown in Table 1, students in the viewing condition had a higher mean
score on the 12 - item written
classroom observation test (7.74 correct, sd = 1.64) than those in the coding condition (6.64, sd = 1.75) or the test - only control condition (6.48, sd = 1.18).
Teachers will also be judged on students» California High School Exit Exam
scores, API
scores, graduation and dropout rates
as well
as classroom observation.
«
As in medicine, a value - added
score, combined with some additional information, should lead us to trigger
classroom observations to identify truly low - performing teachers and to provide feedback,» Doug Harris, a Tulane education economist, wrote in 2012.
They might monitor these teachers» value - added
scores for consistent highs or lows and check how they relate to other measures of teaching, such
as classroom observations.
The report notes that evaluations are most effective when value added
scores are combined with other
classroom measures, such
as observations — which provide opportunities for school leaders and line managers to see teachers in action — and surveys of pupils about the quality of teaching they receive.
Such an adjustment for the makeup of the class is already factored into teachers» value - added
scores; it should be factored into
classroom observation scores as well.
The new evaluations, which will generally use test -
scores as one of multiple measures, including
classroom observations, are increasingly being used in decisions about compensation, retention and tenure.
Increasing the rigor of standards and, subsequently, the demand of tests, will likely increase the proportion of cases where
classroom observation scores and student achievement results align to identify similar teachers
as effective.
Our study, «Relationships between
Observations of Elementary Mathematics Instruction and Student Achievement: Exploring Variability across Districts» explores a potential explanation
as to why differences in the relationships between
classroom observation scores and student test
scores exist across different contexts.