A report out today (but already known for years) is that we will have an enormous energy gap in 4 to 8 years
as our coal and nuclear stations are decommissioned.
Unfortunately, the report follows a thesis that the reliable energy future we all want must still rely primarily on traditional, or «baseload», forms of energy generation such
as coal and nuclear.
Baseload plants such
as coal and nuclear are hit particularly hard by reduced wholesale electricity prices as they have low fuel costs and so don't save much money by shutting down or reducing output on sunny days.
Owing to their high capital cost, low fuel cost, and high capacity factors, technologies such
as coal and nuclear were designed to operate continuously to meet the base - load demand component.
Concerns about the grid are linked to the fast - changing mix of electricity sources, particularly the loss of our most reliable and resilient sources of electricity, such
as coal and nuclear power.
In January, FERC, an independent regulatory government agency that is officially organized as part of the Department of Energy (DOE), thwarted a DOE proposal to require independent system operators and regional transmission organizations to establish «just and reasonable» rates for resilient and reliable plants, such
as coal and nuclear baseload generators.
1) Regulations that directly shut down reliable sources of electricity, such
as coal and nuclear power, and
Essentially, the grid operator's proposal would raise prices across the RTO to provide incentives to «inflexible» generating units such
as coal and nuclear.
The bulk of Winning Our Energy Independence is devoted is describing how solar technologies — sun, wind, and biomass — and garbage are abundant and can provide virtually all of our energy
as coal and nuclear plants and gasoline - fueled transportation are phased out.
Consultants McKinsey forecast that solar energy will be as cheap
as coal and nuclear by 2020.
Not exact matches
NEW YORK, April 1 - FirstEnergy Corp said late on Saturday its
nuclear and coal power plant units filed for bankruptcy court protection
as the company looks to restructure, sell assets
and win government support to cope with competitors using lower - cost natural gas.
Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar - powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint,
and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (
as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate,
and shows what's possible when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee
and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just
as a single kernel of corn grows into a plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983,
and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off oil,
coal,
and nuclear and onto renewables — while keeping
and even improving our high standard of living
To put this all in perspective: «Solar employs slightly more workers than natural gas, over twice
as many
as coal, over three times that of wind energy,
and almost five times the number employed in
nuclear energy,» the report notes.
Despite the modestly slowing rate of cost declines for utility - scale alternative energy generation, the gap between the costs of certain alternative energy technologies (e.g., utility - scale solar
and onshore wind)
and conventional generation technologies continues to widen
as the cost profiles of such conventional generation remain flat (e.g.,
coal)
and, in certain instances, increase (e.g.,
nuclear).
So if we have hydro
and it is not
as reliable
as it used to be in the past, we can supplement with
nuclear or
coal because that is much cheaper, 5, 6 or even 7 cents, it is far cheaper.
«There will be relatively high costs in developing this new
nuclear facility but broadly comparable with other low carbon technologies such
as offshore wind,
and, potentially, carbon capture
and storage applied to gas
and coal fired power stations.
He says the pension fund is also shifting away from investments like
coal and he's not enthused about
nuclear because
as a resident of Long Island, electric customers are still paying for a
nuclear plant which never opened.
I was encouraged by President Obama's calls for the construction of more
nuclear power plants,
as well
as for increased offshore exploration of oil
and natural gas,
and the further development of clean
coal technologies.
In the one case, it is replaced with
coal - based liquid fuels
and in the other with renewable resources, such
as wind, solar, or
nuclear power.
Currently,
nuclear and wind energy (
as well
as clean
coal) are between 25
and 75 percent more expensive than old - fashioned
coal at current prices (not including all the hidden health
and environmental costs of
coal),
and so it will take a stiff charge on
coal to induce rapid replacement of obsolete plants.
This means developing more of America's own energy resources, including wind, solar, clean
coal, biofuels,
nuclear energy,
as well
as oil
and natural gas — which will reduce our dependence on Middle Eastern oil
and create thousands of jobs here at home.
NuScale claims it will be able to produce power at about seven to nine cents per kilowatt - hour — roughly the same
as big
nuclear plants, only a few cents more than the cheapest modern natural gas — fired or
coal - fired plants,
and one - third the cost of a typical diesel generator.
Yet, even if every planned reactor in China was to be built, the country would still rely on burning
coal for more than 50 percent of its electric power —
and the Chinese
nuclear reactors would provide at best roughly the same amount of energy to the developing nation
as does the existing U.S. fleet.
Germany is poised to use it
as a substitute for the
nuclear plants it will shut down by 2022 (see «Germany will use
coal and gas to plug
nuclear power gap»).
With more money for development of novel designs
and public financial support for construction — perhaps
as part of a clean energy portfolio standard that lumps in all low - carbon energy sources, not just renewables or a carbon tax —
nuclear could be one of the pillars of a three - pronged approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions: using less energy to do more (or energy efficiency), low - carbon power,
and electric cars (
as long
as they are charged with electricity from clean sources, not
coal burning).
The point was to prove that a
nuclear power facility could be built
as cheaply
as a
coal - fired power plant,
and the key to that was a smaller safety system.
As a result of the latest ministerial changes, Heseltine's responsibilities now embrace the
coal, oil, gas
and nuclear industries, not to mention renewable energy.
However,
as the UK has shifted focus from
coal -
and oil - fired electricity generation to being more reliant on natural gas
as the fuel of choice (irrespective of wind, solar,
nuclear and other alternatives), this makes the electricity grid somewhat vulnerable to accidental
and incidental problems with the flow of data
and to malicious manipulation for the sake of sabotage, criminal or online military / terrorist action.
Hydrogen can also be split from water in high - temperature
nuclear reactors or generated from fossil fuels such
as coal or natural gas, with the resulting carbon dioxide captured
and sequestered rather than released into the atmosphere.
The energy research offices have priorities that tend to shift with the «partisan» tides, he said,
as administrations
and bureaucrats favor wind or
nuclear or
coal research, for example, depending on the «political» winds.
Strategies to meet the goal would vary by country
and largely rely on advanced technology such
as capturing the carbon dioxide spewed by
coal - burning power plants; the Bush vision also foresees gasoline alternatives,
nuclear power
and an international clean technology fund to promote research into carbon - free energy sources.
December 8, 2017 India's steel industry, like America's, is dominated by electric - based processes November 20, 2017 Link between growth in economic activity
and electricity use is changing around the world November 16, 2017 Growth in global energy - related carbon dioxide emissions expected to slow November 8, 2017 EIA forecasts growth in world
nuclear electricity capacity, led by non-OECD countries October 25, 2017 China leads the growth in projected global natural gas consumption October 10, 2017 Buildings energy consumption in India is expected to increase faster than in other regions October 4, 2017 Global gas - to - liquids growth is dominated by two projects in South Africa
and Uzbekistan September 27, 2017 Chinese
coal - fired electricity generation expected to flatten
as mix shifts to renewables September 19, 2017 Beyond China
and India, energy consumption in non-OECD Asia continues to grow September 14, 2017 EIA projects 28 % increase in world energy use by 2040
Interest in biofuels — fuel derived from living organisms including biomass or their metabolic byproducts, such
as manure from cows — grew throughout the end of the twentieth century
as these are renewable energy sources, unlike other natural resources such
as petroleum,
coal,
and nuclear fuels.
It will only be challenged by
nuclear in specific circumstances,
and coal has significant advantages over
nuclear,
as well
as alternatives such
as hydro
and renewables.
Couch investigates such established sources of energy
as nuclear, natural gas,
and coal as well
as cutting - edge technologies involving wind, solar, hydropower, tidal,
and biomass production in this accessible guide to urgent energy challenges.
About 85 % of the value of Babcock & Wilcox comes from the
nuclear operations business that serves the U.S. Navy
as its end customer
and the power general on business that serves mainly U.S.
coal power plants.
We need
nuclear plants
as quickly
as possible to begin the phase out dirty
coal plants
and to start to think seriously about mass produced, American made electric cars.
Some environmental groups are starting to soften their blanket opposition to
nuclear power
as an option for cutting
coal use
and emissions, but most still maintain that bright line in the sand.
That argument bolsters Prime Minister Modi's commitment to double
coal production by 2020, for example, even
as India also (at a much, much smaller scale) expands solar capacity
and nuclear power.
Mr. Gore was gently challenged by some Republican members of the committee who wanted him to endorse
nuclear power
as a clean alternative to
coal and to endorse returning to the public all revenues from a carbon reduction regime.
One major issue with
nuclear plants (
as well
as coal and all other thermal power plants) is the fresh water wasted in heat rejection.
# 56:
As an addition to your list of the non-positives of
nuclear energy, it is my understanding that the CO2 generated through the enrichment processes of uranium (
and mining
and transportation) is roughly equivalent to the CO2 released by burning
coal.
Multiple studies in the USA
and Europe have found that a diversified regional portfolio of renewables including solar, wind, geothermal
and biomass can produce 24 × 7 baseload electricity that is at least
as reliable
as coal or
nuclear.
I think a comprehensive (
and honest) assessment of alternatives to
coal generation will include not only the hypothetical scaling issues of wind
and direct solar generation but also will address what we know of the operating record of
nuclear plants
and what we can expect
as we attempt to further scale
nuclear power.
Germany increased burning of lignite
coal for exports
as JE says,
and as a bridge after
nuclear was taken offline after the Fukushima disaster
as follows.
It may be fine to argue,
as George Monbiot
and others have done with reams of data, that
nuclear reactors, even after Fukushima, are vastly safer than
coal in terms of lives lost.
In addition to rapidly increasing China's adoption of non-fossil power sources such
as renewables
and nuclear, to mitigate long - lived CO2 emissions, carbon capture
and sequestration (CCS) must be applied to both new
and existing China plants, both
coal and gas.
He also described the important role China sees for imports of natural gas
as a path to cut its reliance on
coal, its view on
nuclear power
and more.
Re 16 # Well, if not, hydrogene (
as sometimes proposed), if not
nuclear energy (not enough secure)
and certainly not gas,
coal and oil, what then?
Using natural gas could both hasten the return to
coal for domestic heating
and electricity,
as well
as help push Canada toward building more
nuclear power plants.