Students found it more interesting to examine real life situations
as they came before the courts, and were stimulated to learn the techniques of interpretation and argument by debating the merits of real cases.
But they do acknowledge that some issues need airing — just not as many
as come before the court!
Not exact matches
Just this week, justices weighed the religious values of company leaders,
as the Hobby Lobby case
came before the Supreme
Court.
The seriousness of the problem is revealed by the fact that, although Trinity Lutheran has
come before the Supreme
Court as a free exercise and equal protection case, the Blaine Amendments most centrally collide with the Establishment Clause.
Professor Valiant:
As a lower -
court judge, Senator, I would apply all governing Supreme Court precedents in cases that come befor
court judge, Senator, I would apply all governing Supreme
Court precedents in cases that come befor
Court precedents in cases that
come before me.
As we exit last Thursday Night, the Playoffs are
coming into clearer focus... Team Darcy got to 6 - 0 and clinched the # 1 overall seed in the Playoffs
before we take the
court for the final week of the Regular Season.
Under the proposed changes fewer cases would
come before the
court,
as those «identical in substance to a claim that has been considered by a national
court» would no longer be eligible - unless the national
court had failed to interpret the convention correctly.
The Interim Measures of the African
Court on Human & People's Rights was not
before them and couldn't have
come before them
as a matter of constitutional dictates.
This is perfectly understandable to me within the general context of the investigation in which the allegation had arisen, and considering that I have lately
come to also realize that two of my colleagues in chambers had been involved
as defence counsel in two cases
before the subject judge amongst twelve cases in all they have ever done at the Industrial
Court since inception.
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior
Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior
Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
Courts shall be superior
courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers
as were vested in a
court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court of record immediately
before the
coming into force of this constitution.
Many of the young they are
courting would have found employment long
before the NDC
came into office, particularly
as they promised to provide jobs for all of them in the year 2000 and went ahead to register over one million, but failed woefully to give them jobs
as they had promised.
Schechter's decision
comes as lawyers representing Trump face another suit - this one filed in early March in Los Angeles Superior
Court by porn star Stormy Daniels, who said Trump sought to silence her shortly
before the 2016 election.
As Ivey will tell you, she had about three hours to prepare
before taking over the governorship,
coming into office at the height of a controversy that forced out her predecessor and inheriting a prison system under federal
court order.
«His service in the Appellate Division earned him the respect of his peers across the state, just
as his concerned and compassionate service
as an Oneida County Family
Court Judge earned him the respect of the children and families who
came before him during their difficult times.
But,
as U.S. District
Court Judge Valerie Caproni advised jurors
before evidence about donations to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's campaign
came up
as an issue, there have been no suggestions that the money flow to Cuomo violated any state laws.
Next
came the legal fireworks when prosecution counsel, Prince Ben Ikani shocked the capacity - filled
court house
as he made frantic efforts to stop the
court from hearing the application for bail even
before it could be moved and argued by the former minister's lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche (SAN).
The issue of satellite imagery
as evidence first
came up
before the International
Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1986 in a dispute between Mali and Burkina Faso [7].
Now,
as the Schuette case
comes before the Supreme
Court on October 15, Garces will represent the CRP by presenting findings from research studies that challenge Proposal 2.
The decision did not
come as a surprise to legal experts following the case, including a few attorneys who had argued other cases involving charter schools
before the
courts.
The message is
coming through loud and clear: Dauphine's professional work on the subject of free - roaming cats — cited and promoted with great enthusiasm
before all this nasty press attention — is
as indefensible
as the actions that landed her in DC Superior
Court.
These included: Mark Rothko, Philip Guston («Philip would say again and again —
as if he had never said it
before — that everything in a work of his had to be «felt»»), Franz Kline (he «held
court at the Cedar Street Tavern almost every night after ten»), David Smith, Tony Smith, Robert Motherwell, Ad Reinhardt, Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman, Hans Hofman («I always admired Hans» painting and believe that certain of his pictures — Lava and Agrigento
come to mind — must be numbered among the greatest abstract expressionist canvases»), Willem de Kooning, and Clyfford Still («
as a de Kooning man, it took me time to appreciate Still's innovation»).
Otherwise, human rights tribunals and the
courts will have to define that phase on an ad hoc basis
as specific cases
come before them, with the corresponding uncertainty, expense and delay of litigation.
He has acted in some of the largest actions to
come before the
courts, such
as JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov, Pinchuk v Bogolyubov, Mezhprom v Pugachev, Republic of Djibouti v Boreh and PrivatBank v Kolomoisky.
The
court can not fulfill its democratic function
as an independent and impartial arbiter between government and the individual, or between individuals, if the government limits those who may
come before the
court by means of financial or procedural deterrents.
It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so
as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the
court when it
comes to decide on the issues
before it.
Despite this, the trend of non-lawyers being appointed
as AGs is not abating and the issue of whether Solicitor - Client Privilege covers their advice is likely to
come before the
courts eventually.
On June 30, 2008, the Ontario government amended the Ontario Human Rights Code («the Code»)
came into force that allow human rights damages under the Code to be dealt with either
as civil claims
before the
courts or
as applications
before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO).
The law took effect on December 10, 2015,
as scheduled, but was contested in the
courts before it
came into force.
Thus, the
Court essentially
came to the same result
as the GC, since both judgments lead to the inapplicability of the Agreements to Western Sahara (a finding that will most likely also have an effect on case C - 266 / 16 UK Western Sahara Campaign, a preliminary reference currently
before the
Court).
Judges should refrain from conduct such
as membership in groups or organizations or participation in public discussion which, in the mind of a reasonable, fair minded and informed person, would undermine confidence in a judge's impartiality with respect to issues that could
come before the
courts.
On such an afternoon some score of members of the High
Court of Chancery bar ought to be... engaged in one of the ten thousand stages of an endless cause, tripping one another up on slippery precedents, groping knee - deep in technicalities, running their goat - hair and horse - hair warded heads against walls of words and making a pretence of equity with serious faces,
as players might... between the registrar's red table and the silk gowns, with bills, cross-bills, answers, rejoinders, injunctions, affidavits, issues, references to masters, masters» reports, mountains of costly nonsense, piled
before them... This is the
Court of Chancery, which has its decaying houses and its blighted lands in every shire, which has its worn - out lunatic in every madhouse and its dead in every churchyard, which has its ruined suitor with his slipshod heels and threadbare dress borrowing and begging through the round of every man's acquaintance, which gives to monied might the means abundantly of wearying out the right, which so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope, so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart, that there is not an honourable man among its practitioners who would not give — who does not often give — the warning, «Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than
come here!
The matter
came before Mrs Justice Hogg between 29 - 31 July 2014 and it was held that the English
Court could not exercise jurisdiction over B
as she was not habitually resident here from the date of her removal to Pakistan.
Crawford v. Roe is the first abortion - related case to
come before the U.S. Supreme
Court since John Roberts was approved
as chief justice.
So, the private investor test was eventually applied in the present case, even though the Commission
came to exactly the same conclusion
as in its first decision which did not include the private investor test.Nevertheless, the Commission continued the proceedings
before the
Court, upholding its plea
If the judge so desires, the account also may reflect who the judge is
as a person,
as well
as a judge, so long that the judge is careful not to implicitly or explicitly convey the judge's opinions on pending or impending cases, political matters, or controversial or contested issues that may
come before the
courts.
«While the eligibility of a particular candidate appointed could have potentially
come before the Supreme
Court (which indeed in the end it did), simply reminding officials of the requirements of applicable law would not in the ICJ's view constitute «a comment that might reasonably be expected to affect the outcome of such proceeding or impair the manifest fairness of the process» (
as expressed in Principle 2.4 of the Bangalore Principles,» he added, referring to the Bangalore principles of judicial conduct.
The Judge stated at [41] «Nor do I think it is fair to draw the inference that the appellant made this calculation, namely «let's win in the Employment Tribunal, maintain
before the Employment Tribunal that my claim for damages is surely unlimited
as to time, pocket those damages calculated on that basis and then
come back to the High
Court in due course and see how far we get with the statutory appeal».
As well as appearing as sole counsel (in the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and a wide variety of ad hoc and institutional arbitrations), James also acts as a member of larger teams on heavyweight litigation, including some of the largest cases to come before the courts in recent year
As well
as appearing as sole counsel (in the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and a wide variety of ad hoc and institutional arbitrations), James also acts as a member of larger teams on heavyweight litigation, including some of the largest cases to come before the courts in recent year
as appearing
as sole counsel (in the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and a wide variety of ad hoc and institutional arbitrations), James also acts as a member of larger teams on heavyweight litigation, including some of the largest cases to come before the courts in recent year
as sole counsel (in the High
Court, the
Court of Appeal, and a wide variety of ad hoc and institutional arbitrations), James also acts
as a member of larger teams on heavyweight litigation, including some of the largest cases to come before the courts in recent year
as a member of larger teams on heavyweight litigation, including some of the largest cases to
come before the
courts in recent years.
Before coming to the UAE he practised
as counsel on the original side of the Bombay High
Court, Bombay, India, for almost a decade and was a part - time lecturer at the K. C. Law College in Bombay.
The plaintiffs challenged eight restrictions on judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on judicial candidates campaigning
as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on judicial candidates making speeches for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on judicial candidates making contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on judicial candidates from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, 5) the prohibition on judges from acting
as a leader or holding office in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during campaigns, 7) the ban on judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to
come before the
court.
But it a fundamental fallacy to assume that the universe of cases
coming before the appellate
courts is the same
as the total universe of cases.
The new protocol
comes as part of the ever increasing encouragement from the
Courts for parties to engage in constructive communications with one another, and possibly even pre-action ADR,
as well
as exchanging information with one another,
before...
As Esmilo takes legal action for default, the question of the validity of the contract
comes before the
court.
At the oral argument
before this
Court, when respondents» counsel was asked whether «this is just a purely Title VII case
as it
comes to us from the
Court of Appeals without any constitutional overtones,» counsel responded:
Before coming to the Bar, Scott worked
as a paralegal in the public law team of Irwin Mitchell, specialising in mental capacity proceedings in the
Court of Protection and judicial review concerning health and social welfare.
(B) A judge shall not serve in a fiduciary position if the judge
as fiduciary will likely be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily
come before the judge, or if the estate, trust, or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the
court on which the judge serves, or one under its appellate jurisdiction.
A judge speaking about a matter likely to
come before the
court harms both the judiciary
as a whole and the sound administration of justice.
I have been sanguine about Rita
coming before Gall, but this morning I remembered Justice Scalia's response to the government's argument that the district
courts would not consider the appellate «presumption of reasonableness» at sentencing, roughly paraphrased
as: «They won't unless they want their sentences to be affirmed on appeal...» I guess I'm
coming around to Prof. Berman's apparent concern that
courts will become more entrenched in their attachment to the guidelines if Rita adopts the presumption, however much the
court says it's only an «appellate» presumption.
Before coming to Utah, Mr. Bowmaster served
as the project manager for the development of Nebraska's district and county
court systems and Nebraska's child support enforcement.
As you'll know, it took seven years and a
court order
before the remainder
came into my possession.