Between these two reductive positions the social sciences may portray the person
as a complex organism equipped with intellectual powers for adaptive adjustment to its environment, both natural and human.
Not exact matches
Just
as a typical
complex organism won't survive if blood isn't pumped around its system sufficiently, so too will a business cease to exist if it doesn't have -LSB-...]
Just
as a typical
complex organism won't survive if blood isn't pumped around its system sufficiently, so too will a business cease to exist if it doesn't have a healthy cash flow.
The fossil record which shows millions of years of stable species, then an explosion of necessarily mutations, all occurring at the precise necessary time required for
complex organisms to develop, and ALL escaping fossilization «the sudden appearance of most species in the geologic record and the lack of evidence of substantial gradual change in most species — from their initial appearance until their extinction — has long been noted, including by Charles Darwin who appealed to the imperfection of the record
as the favored explanation» — Wikipedia
Then,
as a result of genetic duplication, random selection and the environment, those simple life forms * evolved * into slightly more
complex organisms.
Just
as a mountain climber can not jump to the top of the Matterhorn, a (relatively) simple
organism like a bacterium can not even conceivably become a
complex plant or animal except in very gradual stages.
Scientists may think they have good reasons for believing that living
organisms evolved naturally from nonliving chemicals, or that
complex organs evolved by the accumulation of micromutations through natural selection, but having reasons is not the same
as having proof.
It also serves
as a warning to us that the tension between
organism and atomism, between our appreciation of the physical existence of constituents and of
complex bodies, is not likely to be resolved simply by attending more closely to the details in Process and Reality, chapter and verse.
To sum up, Leclerc argues against Whitehead,
as he understands him, that a
complex physical
organism exercises an agency proper to itself which is not simply reducible to the agency of its constituent actual entities.
... Thus personal minds (each with its history of experiences) and enduring bodies finally appear in the philosophy of
organism, but
as variable
complexes rather than metaphysical absolutes.
In a
complex, structured environment, however, the brain of a man for instance, there would be myriad oblique entities which, for example, might be themselves the termini of routes of inheritance from all over the body, which would introduce to the concrescing central entity all sorts of new data from the
complex supporting
organism (such
as hunger pangs, visual impressions, memory traces, sounds, etc.) which were not directly inherited from the dominant past entity.
Stil not evidence that those colonies of bactieria can become a
complex multicelled
organism such
as a frog or a human.
Aristotle described human being
as a layered hierarchy of informed matter, the elements fusing together under the impress of a higher - level form to compose tissues, tissues serving
as the proximate matter for a yet more
complex organizing form at the level of organs, and organs bound into the active, dynamic
organism by the yet higher form of soul.
The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more
complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing societies within which there are social levels that can be identified with cells, others which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to
as the regnant nexus, a social thread of
complex temporal inheritance which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the
organism as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.
Rather man is a highly
complex, multi-levelled, hierarchically structured
organism from which emerge higher - level capacities, such
as thinking and willing.
Once the exceptional, but fundamentally biological, nature of the collective human
complex is accepted, nothing prevents us (provided we take into account the modifications which have occurred in the dimensions in which we are working) from treating
as authentic organs the diverse social
organisms which have gradually evolved in the course of the history of the human race.
As an evolutionary biologist he could see no basis for believing in the mysterious «emergence» of completely novel properties as organisms became more comple
As an evolutionary biologist he could see no basis for believing in the mysterious «emergence» of completely novel properties
as organisms became more comple
as organisms became more
complex.
If the material encasement be coarse and simple,
as in the lower
organisms, it permits only a little intelligence to permeate through it; if it is delicate and
complex, it leaves more pores and exits,
as it were, for the manifestations of consciousness....
It may be thought of
as a supermolecule composed principally of C, H, O, N, P and S. Multicellular
organisms, including man, are in turn not mere aggregations of cells, but so tightly organized that they may be considered super-super-molecules, ultimately with properties which are wholly those of the component atoms in the very
complex combination.
There can still be local decreases in entropy,
as happens with all living
organisms while they are still alive and in some other situations
as, for example, when
complex organic molecules are made from their constituent atoms in outer space,
as now seems to be the case.
Ordinary objects of our experience, such
as rocks and tables, are composed of many strands of enduring objects; and the story of planetary evolution focuses on the careers of incredibly
complex organisms which may be analyzed into societies with sub-societies of many kinds.
Just
as the more
complex organisms are just simple bits clumped together over time, the environmental feedback giving rise to greater complexity over time.
First, virus may or may not be
as ancient
as bacteria, There is serious speculation that they may actually be better viewed
as «rogue dna» that actually budded off from
complex host
organisms.
Despite that archaeal cells were simple and small like bacteria, researchers found that Archaea were more closely related to
organisms with
complex cell types, a group collectively known
as «eukaryotes».
As the fungus fed, it created nourishing soil, setting the stage for the evolution of more
complex organisms, from plants to worms.
In contrast, prokaryotes are
organisms, such
as bacteria and archaea, that lack nuclei and other
complex cell structures.
Sea spray is a
complex mixture of inorganic salts, organic material present in the ocean and living
organisms such
as bacteria, viruses and fungi.
He even wonders whether viruses that infect more
complex organisms, such
as people, could talk to one another.
These findings of the MLU research group on Developmental Genetics suggest that the same genetic program may operate in germ cells of other, more
complex organisms as well — albeit in a timely less compressed form.
«In
complex organisms, such
as fruit flies, mice, and humans, scientists have only been able to infer how these enzymes mechanistically accomplish their tasks,» said Daniel McKay, PhD, assistant professor of genetics and biology and first author of the paper.
Collins said that because Hydra is such a simple animal and because it is able to regenerate after complete dissociation into individual cells, it offers researchers the opportunity to use similar techniques
as the ones employed in their experiments to examine how an
organism develops from an unstructured group of cells into a
complex body plan.
As corals grow, they construct the
complex calcium carbonate framework that provides habitat for fish and other reef
organisms.
Herron and his colleagues scanned the genomes of about 45 species of green algae to see how the position of certain genes might have shifted
as the
organisms grew more
complex.
Self - assembly enables nature to build
complex forms, from multicellular
organisms to
complex animal structures such
as flocks of birds, through the interaction of vast numbers of limited and unreliable individuals.
The reality may be more
complex: on Earth, some resilient
organisms such
as tardigrades can enter a profound, almost indefinite state of hibernation when deprived of moisture, preserving their desiccated tissues but neither growing nor reproducing.
Though little is known about Loki, scientists hope that it will help to resolve one of biology's biggest mysteries: how life transformed from simple single - celled
organisms to the menagerie of
complex life known
as eukaryotes — a category that includes everything from yeast to azaleas to elephants.
Viruses, being dependent on these
organisms to host them, are viewed
as evolutionary latecomers: genomic scraps that fell out onto the floor back when life was assembling itself into more
complex arrangements.
Understanding this process - which is particularly important when cells are first taking on specialized identities such
as nerve cells, muscle, skin, and so on - helps explain how
complex organisms can arise from a finite number of genes.
It may have once been
as simple
as an old computer program, merely parroting what we told it, but now it is more like a very
complex organism that often follows its own urges.»
As oxygen increased in Earth's atmosphere and
organisms became more
complex, different forms of metabolism evolved, from plants» photosynthesis to the lesser - known chemolithotrophy.
This observation applied not only to simple
organisms such
as yeast, but also to more
complex organisms such
as humans.
Now, new research offers a potential solution: Longer RNA chains could have hidden out in porous rocks near volcanic sites such
as hydrothermal ocean vents, where unique temperature conditions might have helped
complex organisms evolve.
That single cell contains all the genetic information needed to develop into a human, and passes identical copies of that information to each new cell
as it divides into the many diverse types of cells that make up a
complex organism like a human being.
As a result, most changes in the DNA of
complex organisms over time are due to drift rather than selection, which is why biologists focus on sequences that are similar, or conserved, when they compare genomes.
Digital
organisms don't have
complex organs such
as eyes, but they can process information in
complex ways.
It provides a general high - throughput approach to identify genes that enhance the fitness of microbes over time
as they grow in
complex living
organisms,» says Georg Gerber, one of the lead authors on the study, and Assistant Professor at Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical School.
But
as Adami points out, if creationists were right, then Avida wouldn't be able to produce
complex digital
organisms.
This information provides clues
as to when different genes are most important during the
complex process of colonizing a living
organism.
New gene - editing technologies such
as CRISPR have sped the development of new crop varieties and animals, but products based on engineered
organisms sometimes face a web of
complex and overlapping regulations before they can reach the market.
How did simple
organisms like yeast and worms evolve into ones
as complex as birds and mammals?