As the court cases played out, the National Indian Brotherhood (now the Assembly of First Nations) argued that women who challenged section 12 (1)(b) were selfish and «anti-Indian» because they fought against the very law (the Indian Act) they viewed as guaranteeing the right of Indigenous self - determination.
* A General Search form for power searching across multiple types of content * Content - specific search forms for targeting specific content types such
as court cases, tribunal decisions, legislation, commentary, and journal articles * Dynamic display options and results filtering for better viewing, sorting, and organizing of search results * Access to recent searches and documents viewed for keeping track of important searches * Alerts and Legal Update services for staying informed
It is no where as combative
as court cases can become.
The Brothers are veteran political operatives so let's keep an eye and watch
as their court case unfolds against Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
He observed, «The Vergara plaintiffs» attack on teacher due - process protections was and is a partisan political crusade masquerading
as a court case.»
Just over a year after the attacks,
as the court case against Anders Breivik was intensely covered in the media, a new — although smaller — increase in the number of trauma - and stressor - related disorders was observed.
As the court case progresses, the movie returns to the home the Lovings eventually find for themselves in the Virginia countryside, mostly isolated from racist judgment, but finally free — surrounded on all sides by open air.
There is one honest, fledgling writer in the ranks of gawkers
as the court case unfolds.
Interpretation of the First Amendment is far from easy,
as court case after court case has tried to define its limits.
RECO has clear and definitive definitions of «Trade in Real Estate»
as this court case once again proves.
Not exact matches
In referring to 1964, Abrams is talking about the landmark Sullivan vs. New York Times
case, in which the Supreme
Court established what's known
as the «malice standard» for libel.
The Air Force
Court of Appeals in May 2017 also reversed a conviction in the sexual assault
case U.S. v. Boyce after finding that public statements by Sens. Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand regarding the «Marines United» scandal earlier this year created «the appearance of unlawful command influence» in the
case,
as retired Col. Don Christensen, a former Air Force chief prosecutor and current president of the advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, told Task & Purpose at the time.
In the
case, National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services, the High
Court ruled that ISPs are information services,
as the FCC had defined them at the time, and not public utilities.
There's the third, more realistic action, which is you have to get some sort of production order of the data at Uber
as evidence in a
court case.
GENEVA — Russian billionaire and Chelsea soccer club owner Roman Abramovich has appeared in a Swiss
court as part of a 19 - year - old legal
case aimed to wrest 46 million Swiss francs in debts allegedly owed by him and others to a European bank.
As it turns out, it's not just the Hulk Hogan
case: Thiel admitted in his interview with the Times that he decided several years ago to secretly fund multiple
cases in an attempt to cripple the company, and that there is at least one other
case before the
courts that he's involved in.
In some
cases, these retailers were able to come to an agreement with their creditors and restructure their debts without going through bankruptcy
court,
as the threat of bankruptcy motivates the creditors to negotiate.
Gawker Media founder and CEO Nick Denton will file for personal bankruptcy protection
as early
as Monday after losing a fight in a Florida
court for a shield against a judgment in a breach of privacy
case involving professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, according to a person familiar with the matter.
A judge ruled in favor of the House in 2016, but an appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue
as the
case moved its way through the
courts.
As the nine justices grappled with the technological complexities of email data storage, liberals Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor questioned whether the
court needed to act in the data privacy
case in light of Congress now considering bipartisan legislation that would resolve the legal issue.
In the
case of the U.S., our own Supreme
Court has already defined greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act
as dangerous pollutants that must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency.
The suits are part of a group of at least four other
cases with similar arguments in various
courts around the country, and they make legal experts wary, particularly
as the differences in opinion seem to indicate their destiny to go before the Supreme
Court.
The
case was eventually thrown out of
court,
as there is no widely accepted standard definition of craft beer.
Just this week, justices weighed the religious values of company leaders,
as the Hobby Lobby
case came before the Supreme
Court.
GENEVA (AP)-- Russian billionaire and Chelsea soccer club owner Roman Abramovich has appeared in a Swiss
court as part of a 19 - year - old legal
case aimed to wrest 46 million Swiss francs ($ 46 million) in debts allegedly owed by him and others to a European bank.
The March for Life
case may well wind up before the Supreme
Court,
as the federal government is expected to appeal the
case to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Court, The New York Times reports.
«On a general level, there can be practical barriers to pursuit of a criminal
case, such
as the victim company's fear of embarrassment, reputational damage, or the perceived risk — real or not — that their trade secrets will be exposed in a
court proceeding,» said Brooke French, shareholder at law firm Carlton Fields.
In December, the Yukon appeal
court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this
case to an area known
as the Kaska.
The president said he would take the
case «
as far
as it needs to go,» including to the Supreme
Court, in order to get a ruling that the ban is legal.
Evidence of lack of business integrity (such
as indictments, pleas of guilt in legal
cases, convictions for violations of legal behavior, adverse civil judgements, or out - of -
court settlements).
Bounce then followed this up with a second
case — this one filed in a Texas
court in April 2016 — repeating these allegations, also accusing Yieldify of patent infringement, and adding some of Yieldify's customers
as defendants.
The U.S. Supreme
Court may present a favorable ruling for legalized betting
as soon
as this month, though the
Court does not announce the order of the
case decisions that it will release.
In some
cases it has to remove content because of a
court order, but in other
cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such
as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the content.
As a result, the Supreme Court is spending the anniversary hearing the fourth challenge to the law in as many years, in a case called Zubik v. Burwel
As a result, the Supreme
Court is spending the anniversary hearing the fourth challenge to the law in
as many years, in a case called Zubik v. Burwel
as many years, in a
case called Zubik v. Burwell.
Last week a London
court ruled that a plumber was entitled to full employment rights despite being technically self - employed, in a
case seen
as a key test which could force employers to start offering irregular workers benefits including pensions and holiday pay.
Meanwhile, other big digital newcomers to the media scene, including BuzzFeed and Business Insider, have also been slow to take up the public interest banner long carried by the likes of the New York Times and the Press - Enterprise (a small California paper that,
as Liptak explained, took two free speech
cases all the way to the Supreme
Court in the 1980s).
Moonves spoke just
as Aereo took a
case involving major media companies back to a lower
court after losing in the Supreme Court last m
court after losing in the Supreme
Court last m
Court last month.
Parker was acquitted in the rape
case more than a decade ago and Celestin had his sexual assault conviction overturned on appeal (a higher
court deemed his trial attorney ineffective), but the two men have come under fire once again
as the media reports troubling details from the
case, which included accusations that Parker and Celestin, then both 19, had sex with a Penn State freshman while she was unconscious after a night of heavy drinking.
As Democrats intensify their criticisms of Supreme
Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, whose confirmation hearing is scheduled for Monday, his track record on criminal
cases has become a focus.
7th US Circuit
Court of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, was questioned intensely about her Catholic faith
as a result of past writings expressing her beliefs on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty
cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the law, writing that — in limited situations — judges should step back in
cases that conflict with their personal conscience.
Huawei or its subsidiaries have been cited
as a defendant or co-defendant in at least 172 federal patent infringement
cases since 2003, according to a review of
court filings.
Abedin listed the
case as «contested,» meaning there was dispute between the couple, who were both scheduled to appear in
court on Wednesday afternoon.
NEW DELHI / MUMBAI, Feb 27 - A company owned by Nirav Modi, the billionaire jeweler at the heart of a $ 2 billion fraud
case in India, has filed for bankruptcy in a New York
court,
as investigators stepped up their investigation into a
case that has stunned the country.
But
as law professor Eugene Volokh notes, the First Amendment argument is a strong one, and the Supreme
Court would likely hear the
case since it involves striking down a federal statute.
Taking place in a California federal
court, the
case pits Apple against the U.S. government over control of the iPhone, with terrorism and privacy
as the backdrop.
The Supreme
Court is set to hear arguments Wednesday in a
case that could derail the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly referred to
as Obamacare, and potentially increase the cost of insurance for millions across the U.S.. It's a big deal, and it has insurance companies, medical providers and everyday workers holding their breath.
As an economic statistician who analyzes data for a living, I have been fascinated to observe the recent
court case involving hiQ Labs and LinkedIn.
In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller
case, the Supreme
Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as
Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the
court said that protection applies at a local level as
court said that protection applies at a local level
as well.
After the decision, the Baltimore office of the public defender began reviewing hundreds of
cases which hinged on StingRay technology, all of which could potentially be challenged
as a result of the Maryland
court ruling.
As it turned out, 18 minutes of sworn testimony from Redstone, presented in
court Friday, was all it took to resolve the
case — but not in Herzer's favor.