Sentences with phrase «as court ordered counseling»

Not exact matches

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

A copy of the suit said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

A copy of the suit, which is available to ClassFMonline.com said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

At the hearing on Monday, Counsel to EFCC, Rotimi Oyedepo, informed the Court that the interim order had been published in a national newspaper as directed and no one contested the forfeiture order.

Many couples Iâ $ ™ ve counseled fall into a rut of using food as their primary way of spending time together — going out to dinner, or for ice cream, ordering pizza, making brunchâ $ ¦ Try mixing things up and plan activities that don't revolve around food (go to a play, art gallery or museum, or do something active, like hiking, biking, or indoor rock climbing), or involve healthy eating (visit a farmerâ $ ™ s market instead of a food court).

He also was ordered to pay a $ 100 fine and $ 450 in court costs, undergo psychiatric counseling and (as if the sentence weren't already asinine enough) perform community service at an animal shelter.

For his part, Blott fought the prohibition order on the grounds that his conduct didn't meet the high standard necessary for the court to remove him as counsel.

Counsel further recognised that the court would be reluctant as a matter of public policy to set aside adoption orders.

Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the main allegations against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.

Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the principal allegations against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.

«If a party or counsel were to act such as to improperly circumvent a court order, they would face potential consequences under the Rules of Professional Conduct or possibly under contempt provisions.»

He initially called the court, as well as social services, but was informed that the decision to provide counselling to jurors is at the discretion of the trial judge, and if it not ordered, jurors have to seek and pay for it on their own.

Attis represents important appellate Court guidance for the class action bar as, prior to Attis, certain decisions, most notably Poulin v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada, earmarked class counsel as a potential payment source for defendants in situations where the plaintiffs were unwilling or unable to cover costs ordered against them.

As reported in the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division has confirmed a ruling made by a Superior Court Judge that orders the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office to pay two news outlets more than $ 100,000 in counsel fees after they successfully sued the office for access to 911 call recordings involving the fatal shooting of an individual.

As the Court of Appeal wrote, «the proof is in the pudding» — counsel for one of the Respondents calculated the lowest intermediate balance for each beneficiary (and the proportion each balance comprised) to the satisfaction of the Chambers Judge who signed the Order.

Zooberg Law Firm will continue to represent any clients that it files petitions for until an order of the Court removing the firm as counsel is entered.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repCourt of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repcourt against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

In order for your criminal lawyer to appear on your behalf, without needing you to attend every court proceeding, your lawyer will prepare and pass on a document referred to as a Designation of Counsel.

As such the Court of Appeal replaced the Master's order with an order that Mr. Blackburn, through his counsel, must deliver the unredacted document received from the WVPD to Ms. Este or her counsel forthwith.

Michael represents clients in all phases of complex copyright, trademark and patent disputes, including hearings and appeals before administrative agencies, prosecuting and defending temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions, arguing dispositive motions, and serving as lead counsel in trials before state and federal courts throughout the country.

Once completed, the detailed parenting plan is reviewed by legal counsel and may form part of a separation agreement or court order, and may be revisited as children develop and change.

Served as lead counsel for the defendant and obtained reversal by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals of a district court's order certifying a 29 - jurisdiction class action alleging consumer fraud by a Fortune 50 retailer, and subsequently successfully moved for dismissal with prejudice of named plaintiff's claims and obtained a nationwide injunction against future attempts to certify a class based on similar allegatCourt of Appeals of a district court's order certifying a 29 - jurisdiction class action alleging consumer fraud by a Fortune 50 retailer, and subsequently successfully moved for dismissal with prejudice of named plaintiff's claims and obtained a nationwide injunction against future attempts to certify a class based on similar allegatcourt's order certifying a 29 - jurisdiction class action alleging consumer fraud by a Fortune 50 retailer, and subsequently successfully moved for dismissal with prejudice of named plaintiff's claims and obtained a nationwide injunction against future attempts to certify a class based on similar allegations.

Family court judges should continue to employ traditional tools such as drug testing, drug counseling, and ordering the parent not use marijuana while exercising parenting time in order to ensure the child's best interest are protected despite a parent's legal use of medical or recreational marijuana

I further order that Ms. Lavalley [Lawyer - Mom] may not act as counsel for her son without further Court Oorder that Ms. Lavalley [Lawyer - Mom] may not act as counsel for her son without further Court OrderOrder.

Assisted probationers with locating places to complete court ordered conditions, such as substance abuse evaluations, domestic violence counseling, and anger management counseling

(b) Collaborative law is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage dispute on an agreed basis without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.

Collaborative Divorce is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage disputes on an agreed basis without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.

Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.

While the child is in foster care, the court orders reunification efforts such as counseling, drug or alcohol rehabilitation, or parenting classes to help parents restore their abilities to care for their children.

The mother's counsel took exception to the trial court's order, and the court permitted the mother to proffer her own testimony, as well as the testimony of Summerlin and Dr. Koch....

In severe cases, such as favored parents who defy court orders and refuse counseling, may require one to pursue additional court intervention.

If you're coming to us for mandatory anger management classes, whether you've been court - ordered to complete anger management counseling or you've been mandated to take a course because of issues at work, you should think of anger management counseling not just as a requirement but as an opportunity to make your life more peaceful.

So buy it now, read the chapter on court orders so that your note keeping bears in mind the probability of disclosure of your records to a court and the two chapters on counselling clients as witnesses and victims.

These restrictions seek to address such issues as: · spouse abuse · child abuse · alcohol abuse and substance abuse · harmful exposure to the other parent's paramour or significant other · no smoking due to a child's asthma · mental health counseling and medication compliance · anger management · parent skills education · safe child transfer or transition between parents · advance notice of relocation · proper use of an infant or child car seat · interference with visitation and appropriate make - up visitation Sometimes courts find it necessary to order supervised visitation, including through court - related supervised visitation programs.

Coldwell Banker Village Green Realty v. Pillsworth (32 A.D. 3rd 568 [3rd Dept.]-RRB-- Order of the Supreme Court granting broker's motion for summary judgment affirmed; in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the broker's right to a commission is not contingent upon performance of the underlying real estate contract, receipt by the seller of the sale price, transfer of title, or even a formal execution of a legally enforceable sales contract; seller could not utilize the provisions of a subsequently executed sales contract wherein seller agreed to pay broker's commission «if and when title closes» as a bootstrap to avoid her obligation to the broker under the clear and unambiguous provisions of the listing agreement as such language was contained in the contract of sale prepared by counsel and to which broker was not a party; provisions in listing agreement that seller would accept a binder or purchase contract contingent upon purchaser's ability to obtain conventional financing and provided any other contingencies in the binder or purchase agreement are acceptable to the seller speak only to the type of purchase offer that seller was obligated to accept and does not alter or otherwise qualify broker's right to a commission