Sentences with phrase «as courts decided»

It arose over time starting in the 1950s as courts decided civil rights suits.

Not only that, but as the court itself decided in former decisions that violations are «time - critical», the parties set an short ultimatum for an answer.

If you both pass away and you named no one else as a beneficiary, the policy benefits are then added to your estate and held up during the probate process as a court decides what to do with the money.

Not exact matches

As it turns out, it's not just the Hulk Hogan case: Thiel admitted in his interview with the Times that he decided several years ago to secretly fund multiple cases in an attempt to cripple the company, and that there is at least one other case before the courts that he's involved in.

The Irish High Court's referral to the ECJ only specifically asks the European court to clarify whether standard contractual clauses are valid or not, given the existence of U.S. mass surveillance programs such as PRISM, but the ECJ may also choose to decide on the validity of Privacy ShCourt's referral to the ECJ only specifically asks the European court to clarify whether standard contractual clauses are valid or not, given the existence of U.S. mass surveillance programs such as PRISM, but the ECJ may also choose to decide on the validity of Privacy Shcourt to clarify whether standard contractual clauses are valid or not, given the existence of U.S. mass surveillance programs such as PRISM, but the ECJ may also choose to decide on the validity of Privacy Shield.

The High Court will decide whether Uber's app can be legally classed as a «taximeter», which is permitted in black cabs only, the FT reports.

At a hearing in Moscow's Tverskoy District Court to decide whether Magomedov and his associates should be detained before their trial, Judge Maria Sizintseva said they had acted as part of an organised crime group and had tried to put pressure on witnesses.

This news comes weeks after Waymo dismissed three of the four patent - infringement claims in the suit and a court decided to allow Uber to depose Alphabet CEO Larry Page as well as David Drummond, the company's chief legal officer and senior vice president of corporate development.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- A lawsuit filed by drivers against ride service Uber should not proceed as a class action, the company argued in a court filing on Thursday, citing written statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.

And the court has now decided pretty much precisely as B.C. hoped it would.

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

In the landmark 1969 Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, the court decided that there were limits to students» rights at school, but that «It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,» as Justice Abe Fortas wCourt case Tinker v. Des Moines, the court decided that there were limits to students» rights at school, but that «It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,» as Justice Abe Fortas wcourt decided that there were limits to students» rights at school, but that «It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,» as Justice Abe Fortas wrote.

Leaving aside materiality — and I guess there's some question as to whether a court would find it material that Jana Partners is building an activist stake, though maybe not much of one — there's no breach of a duty if Jana «officially» decides to leak its information to other hedge funds.

In any case, Giuliani's admission is more evidence that as Robert Mueller's team closes in on the Oval Office, Trump has decided to double down on litigating the president's scandals in the court of public opinion.

If I were the president, I would take the partisan judicial activism masquerading as constitutional principle route, no matter what the Court decides.

After all, as the rather grisly specifics of the practice of animal sacrifice suggest, it would require a rather unnatural detachment for the members of the Court not to disapprove of any of the variety of religious beliefs or practices that they encounter in the cases they must decide.

The Supreme Court decided that money = speach and that corporations have the same rights as American citizens!

When they are, such considerations are often related to various interpretations of religious freedom, as in the Hobby Lobby case decided by the US Supreme Court in 2014.

And those who care about religious liberty should know at least as much about that case, McCullen v. Coakley, as they do about the more narrowly decided case with which the Court ended its term.

The court never decided who had ultimate say over Ryan's care, his parents or medical professionals, because his treatment was transferred to a different doctor who did not view his case as futile.

The amendment would require Oklahoma courts to «rely on federal and state law when deciding cases» and «forbids courts from considering or using» either international law or Islamic religious law, known as Sharia, which the amendment defined as being based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed.

It does not follow from the decriminalization of suicide (as the Supreme Court seems to imagine) that suicide is morally right, nor was suicide decriminalized because we had decided that it is morally right.

In Carl Jung's teaching, for example, the integrated soul «dispenses with the conscience as the court which distinguishes and decides between right and wrong.

Having endured for half a century a Court that seized authority not confided to it to lay down as unalterable law a liberal social agenda nowhere to be found in the actual Constitution of the United States, conservatives must decide whether they want a Court that behaves in the same way but in the service of their agenda.

For the time being, however, the injunction has been lifted again - as of 9th September - by a higher court, not in order to pre-judge the case, but simply deciding that the ban was premature and disproportionate.

That is why every few years the Court must reiterate this abortion right as foundational to its legitimacy and to all the cases about privacy decided since Roe....

Since there is no soul to worry about then it is a matter of deciding when a fertilized egg should be given its own rights as a human and that line has been drawn by the courts at viability outside the womb which from virtually every educated medical doctor will tell you is at around 20 - 22 weeks.

Amy Sherman, who has studied charitable choice and who is also a strong supporter of the program, has said that «the courts have not yet decided what is allowed and what is proscribed under Charitable Choice, but Christians should hope for as broad an interpretation as possible.»

With abortion clinics closing at record rates as abortions hit near - record lows and state restrictions hit near - record highs, a respected report released today reveals that U.S. abortions have dropped to their lowest rate since 1973 — the year the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade.

He maintains that it simply stands for the power of the Court, as a coequal branch of government, to act on its own interpretation of the Constitution in deciding what it can and can not do.

I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by other departments of the government.

That's the primary reason he's decided to take Waiters out as a starter, despite previously saying that Kyrie Irving and Waiters needed more time on the court together.

As a senior I decided to try out again because two or three projected starters were not going to play (injuries, other priorities) and our school that year had the honor of being selected to play a game in the Meadow - lands on the Nets court.

Adam «Air» Bernkopf made fans hold their collective breath as he dribbled into the open court, in what would have been the first dunk of the summer, however he decided to go causal and lay it in.

I believe there is some litigation related to this ongoing (need to readup more on that) and if the courts so decide then maybe the UFC will be forced to treat them as «Employees» and thus forced to provide much better healthcare coverage atleast.

If Bayern do decided to cash in as Carlo Ancelloti looks to shape his new side then half of Europe will be courting the German World Cup winner.

However, time together is equally as important now as it was during your courting stages — so be sure to decide early on how you will include «alone time» into your schedule.

Back to the National Assembly where a wrong type of economic conversation was going on in relation to the beleaguered MTN Nigeria as some members of the House of Representatives decided that in addition to their considerable legislative duties, they desired to hijack the duties of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), those of the telecommunications regulators - NCC and the Ministry of Communications and indeed the judicial functions of our courts as well!!!

But until they decide to, the courts will continue to apply the old English law of confidence, modified by the right to a private life from the European Convention on Human Rights, as is their duty.

He said in a statement at the time that: ``... I have this morning 4th November, 2016 filed an application at the Supreme Court for leave to examine the judgment debtor as the citizen public interest plaintiff in favour of whom the case was decided for the Republic of Ghana.»

Mayoral hopeful Bo Dietl said he knew he'd lose his court bid to run as Democrat when he saw the Supreme Court judge who decided the case — and she «looked like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane Mccourt bid to run as Democrat when he saw the Supreme Court judge who decided the case — and she «looked like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane McCourt judge who decided the case — and she «looked like» de Blasio's wife, NYC First Lady Chirlane McCray.

He stated that after weighing all the options, the Commission, as a responsible organization, decided that it should not be seen to be disobeying a court order, «however inappropriate it may consider the order.

[103] Both maps were challenged in state court, and the case had not been decided as of early September 2012; the 2012 elections continued as planned.

As federal courts move to decide whether to intervene on the Congressional redistricting process, the last ditch legal efforts on behalf of Albany's legislative leaders to dismiss the lawsuit was rejected by a three judge panel this evening.

There, the court decided that as the issue was such a high profile ethical debate, Parliament should first of all have a chance to decide the matter, before the courts do.

Because in the Peskova ruling of May 2017 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided that a bird strike was an «extraordinary event» under EU flight compensation regulation 261 - with the result that airlines didn't have to pay compensation, just as they don't for delays caused by lightning strikes or severe weather events.

The Government and the Attorney - General also find it «honourable» to smuggle into the White Paper on the Commissioner's report the Balkan Energy Ghana case which was argued by me as the Attorney - General before the Supreme Court and conclusively decided in favour of the Republic and was not the subject of the Commissioner's enquiry.

But the high court decided the methods the minister tried to use to bring in these cuts were «so unfair as to be illegal».

As an institution that obeys the law and court orders, the Senate has decided that it will comply with the judgement of the Federal High Court and do nothing to stop Senator Ovie Omo - Agege from resuming in his office and at plenary from tomorrow May 15, 2018, pending the determination of the application for stay of execucourt orders, the Senate has decided that it will comply with the judgement of the Federal High Court and do nothing to stop Senator Ovie Omo - Agege from resuming in his office and at plenary from tomorrow May 15, 2018, pending the determination of the application for stay of execuCourt and do nothing to stop Senator Ovie Omo - Agege from resuming in his office and at plenary from tomorrow May 15, 2018, pending the determination of the application for stay of execution.

Kelly Kramer, a white - collar criminal defense attorney at the Mayer Brown firm, said the Supreme Court has scaled back the «honest services fraud» statute, as it is called, in deciding the case of former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling, limiting such prosecutions to cases involving bribes or kickbacks, rather than mere self - dealing.