Sentences with phrase «as creator of the universe»

Of course Deism holds to the belief of God as the creator of the universe.

Jumping to the conclusion that «ripples in space time» are proof of god as creator of the universe reveals Ms Wickman's true bias.

belief in one god as creator of the universe, intervening in it and sustaining a personal...

Chud — as the creator of the universe, I've seen and done a lot — more than you can comprehend, actually.

Moreover it is necessary to show how God can be conceived of as the creator of the universe, as that universe is described by modern science.

As creator of the universe, He kinda gets free license to do as He pleases and is not held to your or my standard on what is «right.»

As the creator of this universe it is such a thrill when a work comes along that not only adds to it, but makes it better.

The live - action work explores the mythological notion of the female spider as the creator of the universe, and the unusual sexual cannibalism of the Australian redback spider.

Not exact matches

I see the universe as Prof.Hawkings has helped to show us well its one of the best hints that there is a creator behind it.Why?

But of course and religious quotings you consider as poison because you want to be deafening and blinding your self from recognizing the existence of GOD the Creator of the universe...!?! Where ever you head you will find GOD and GOD loving people so get used to it... You are running and running away but you can't run away from your self...!

As to why, I would think the creator of the universe had his reasons.

a. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.

this is blaspemy, speaking to the the creator of the universe as if He were some bloke in a bar?

And those who have the privilege of being selected to go to heaven, serve in an official capacity as «kings and priests» (Rev 1:6), not as equals to God, but as 144,000 individuals who recognize that God, whose name is Jehovah, is the Grand Creator of all the universe, with these ones casting their crowns before God's throne, saying: «You are worthy, Jehovah, even our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they existed and were created.»

Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;

And why should they not revere You, great [as is your] Self, more to be prized even than Brahman, first creator, Infinite, Lord of gods, home of the universe?

For those who see prayer as meaningless, is it not because that they have no recognition of a Creator, a Supreme Being who made the universe with all life.

If you were the creator of a universe 100 billion light years in diameter, that probably is also multi-dimensional as well as eternal, would you hang around trying to impress a group of arrogant primates who a milli - second ago were brachiating among the tress of Africa?

Im not understanding I guess... you object to my statement that the creator of the universe, as humans generally portray «him» — would have be superior intellectually to our greatest minds by a wide margin?

@TG: «For those who see prayer as meaningless, is it not because that they have no recognition of a Creator, a Supreme Being who made the universe with all life.

L'Engle challenges us to imagine a God that is bigger, the creator and sustainer of a universe that, as modern science is revealing to us, is much more mysterious and complex than we generally suppose.

We should not try to downplay or deny this, especially since the very unity of the laws of Nature can point the modern mind so powerfully towards recognition of God as Creator, the Supreme Mind that frames the vast Unity of Meaning and Finality that is the material universe.

Rather, the two would come together in a cosmocentric, immanental model of transcendence: God the creator of the evolving, incredibly vast and complex universe understood as the divine «body.»

From this beginning came all that followed, so everything that is is related, woven into a seamless network, with life gradually emerging after billions of years on this planet (and perhaps on others) and resulting in the incredibly complex, intricate universe we see today.32 To think of God as the creator and continuing creator / sustainer of this massive, breathtaking cosmic fact dwarfs all our traditional images of divine transcendence — whether political or metaphysical.

''... the entire universe SCREAMS of evidence for a creator being...» Such as?

First answer: We worship (attribute worth to) as creator, the one who was from the foundations of the universe.

It is they that enable a coherent metaphysics to be developed that implies the existence of a spiritual creator and sustainer of the universe — whom we know as God.

With the empirical evidence of the universe evolving, it is possible to accept the Thomistic argument from finitude and contingency as recast in evolutionary categories.5 Without the evolutionary category of birth, it would be impossible for us to argue that the universe had a Creator - Ground, for we would have to imagine process as a horizontal straight line that extends in either direction indefinitely and infinitely.

Asking the creator of the universe for a favour as if he didn't know already what you or someone else needs.

Great as is the significance of the emergence of self - conscious persons within the very fabric of the universe for any reflection on its possible meaning and purpose, this must not lead us to underplay the significance also of the rest of the universe and of all other living organisms to God as Creator — even though we are able to depict only in imagination the kind of delight that God may be conceived to have in the fecund multiplicity and variety or created forms.

Thus, God who gives «birth» to the universe, or God as Creator - Ground, is the Alpha or he - who - was; God as Ground of evolution or growth is God as he - who - is; and God as the Absolute Future of the universe, the term of the process, is the Omega, or he - who - is - coming, or will be.

Thus, God as Creator - Ground is the source of the initial time of the universe; as Ground of growth, he is the source of present time; and as Ground - Omega, he is the source of maturation or fullness of time.

By making himself the center of the universe, man cuts himself off from his own fulfillment — a fulfillment which can take place only as he establishes a genuine relatedness to the rest of creation and to the Creator.

Nevertheless, while contingent for him, establish what are for us necessary truths of reality since anthropological limitations of all our understanding may prevent conceiving of other universes which are actually possible for God as Creator.

The research points out that the existence of the universe as a causal chain requires a creator that was itself un-created.

Since Vic and Theo keep blathering about their sky fairy, their supposed «creator» of the universe, it is now appropriate to point out that the foundation of their religion is complete nonsense, along with other issues regarding their sicko bigoted, se.xist supersti.tion known as Christianity:

The notion that the creator of the whole universe would choose to be known in only one religious tradition, which just fortunately happens to be our own, strikes us as impossible.

Until I physically see a single fossil record supporting macro-evolution, or a bird give live birth to a mammal, or a monkey hatch from a chicken egg (I am being ridiculous intentionally, because macro-evolution is literally that ridiculous), I will go with the FACT that the theory of macro-evolution is hogwash and just as imaginary as an all powerful creator of the universe.

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

The cosmic «I» no longer sees the perpetual perishing of worlds or universes, or even itself, as ultimate evil, but instead cries out in adoration to its creator: «It is enough to have been created, to have embodied for a moment the infinite and tumultuously creative spirit.

It served a valuable purpose for a good while, and I don't begrudge others who still do it, as long as they typify me or my children as hell - bound because they don't pretend to have a sacred, personal relationship with the creator of the universe.

When the gods were understood either mythically or in visual images, they could be understood as powerful forces in the production of the universe, but not in a radical sense as creators.

What these redefinitions have in common is that God is limited by His goodness and is not to be conceived of as the Creator of the entire universe, the good as well as the evil.

When you have a direct line to the Creator of the universe, you don't feel as intimidated by worldly things.

The Bible differs from other ancient religions of the East in holding that the Creator is immeasurably more than His creation; that He is personal but can not be limited; that He is supremely intelligent, as evidenced by the intelligibility of the universe; and, above all, that He is good.

The idea, however, that we as humans are so important to the universe's creator that we required the bloody violent sacrifice of his son, that is to say himself, seems strangely arrogant considering how minor a part of the universe we are.

In reviewing how her mind has changed from a Barthian position in the 1950's through the feminist and liberation theology emphases to a more wholistic and cosmic focus, Sallie McFague has experienced a deconstruction of the central symbol of God as patriarchal, hierarchical and militaristic, and a reconstruction of God as creator and sustainer of everything in his universe.

If he ever has the opportunity to share his notions about the universe around us with the creator, I think the creator will find his hypothases about creation just as amusing as the rest of our opinions.

He affirms that whilst the universe is «as one would expect» an «intelligent creator to make it» we don't have the evidence for an incontrovertible proof - as per the title of the latest book of another prominent contributor to the documentary: There Almost Certainly Is A God.

Are they the one's on Earth controlling our lives or are you about God the creator of universe that is worshipped by mankind in different ways, given different names, given different looks and combinations, partners, sons... others worshiped Satan or made him partner to God... The Message of the «Monotheism» was there from time of existance up to Noah PBUH and the monotheist derived from those saved by Noah named Abraham PBUH who came up then with the message of «Submission» and rebuilt the house of worship in Mecca for religion teachings redirecting pagans worshiping idols, trees, or worshiping many Gods they made and named as in Greek mythology...