We also find that, for large cumulative totals in particular, cumulative metrics based on integrations over smaller time periods, such as 2010 — 2050, do not correlate with peak warming as well
as cumulative emissions to a given date near the time of peak warming.
Inclusion of short - term forcing agents within a rate - of - change target is a natural extension of this approach, and could provide a framework for including both emissions rates, or «flows», as well
as cumulative emissions, or «stocks», into a set of climate targets that are better informed by current climate science than emissions rates in a given year or long - term concentrations.
It's no surprise that Mr. Su harped back to the principle of we heard repeatedly from Mr. Su, historical emissions matter,
as the cumulative emissions of the E.U. and U.S. are much larger than China's.
Responsibility, by which we mean contribution to the climate problem, is similarly defined
as cumulative emissions (since some agreed starting year) excluding emissions that correspond to consumption below the development threshold.
Not exact matches
Other scientists have criticized the planetary boundaries
as too generous (for example, allowing too much human appropriation of freshwater flows) or employing the wrong metric (atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rather than
cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases).
Another graphic, circulated on Twitter by German broadcaster Deutsch Welle, shows how different
cumulative, historic
emissions look from the current scenario: China three years ago surpassed the United States
as the global greenhouse gas
emissions leader.
Instead, what's important is the
cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2)-- since a single molecule of CO2 can linger in the atmosphere for
as long
as 1,000 years — emitted since the dawn of the industrial era.
Finally, to revisit the question originally posed @ 203: Assuming the IEO2011 Reference case of «1 trillion metric tons of additional
cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide
emissions between 2009 and 2035», and given that this case equates to following RCP8.5 until 2035
as previously demonstrated @ 408, what increase in average global surface temperature relative to pre-industrial would result by 2035?
Assuming the IEO2011 Reference case of «1 trillion metric tons of additional
cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide
emissions between 2009 and 2035», and given that this case equates to following RCP8.5 until 2035
as previously demonstrated @ 408, what increase in average global surface temperature relative to pre-industrial would result by 2035?
Mark — What are your thoughts about the analysis by Ramanathan and Feng (PNAS, Sept 17,2008: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803838105), in which they calculate the committed warming of
cumulative emissions since the pre-industrial era
as in the region of 2.4 °C (with a confidence interval of 1.4 °C to 4.3 °C), based on calculating the equilibrium temperature if GHG concentrations are held at 2005 levels into the future.
The unforced temperature estimate is used
as a proxy for what
cumulative emissions should be given the current level of warming.
«
As a result, ocean waters deeper than 500 meters (about 1,600 feet) have a large but still unrealized absorption capacity...
As emissions slow in the future, the oceans will continue to absorb excess CO2... into ever - deeper layers... eventually, 50 to 80 percent of CO2
cumulative emissions will likely reside in the oceans»
Take
cumulative [greenhouse gas]
emissions as an example.
With more than 13,000 taxis traveling a
cumulative 500 million miles per year, the improvement in fuel efficiency and
emissions,
as well
as the improved safety for the passengers and pedestrians & cyclists should make a pretty big difference to the impact that the fleet has.
Furthermore, let me come back to the pathway
as the source of
cumulative emissions — energy mix, efficiency, technology finance, population, etc. etc., we believe this is the deeper driver to lead to the landscape of
cumulative emissions.
When we design the architecture for the next 10 or 20 years that means today when we discuss that, we encourage developed countries to consider their
cumulative emissions as a total and then to take more responsibility.
Drawing on experience building a customer base for various products over many years, Clark sees efforts to curb
emissions of greenhouse gases
as a solution that — because of the long - term and
cumulative nature of warming risks — is offered well ahead of public recognition of the problem (truly disruptive changes to conditions and resources humans depend on).
Clear decrease in average rainfall over Central America
as a consequence of 21st century climate change, depending on the height of
cumulative greenhouse gas
emissions.
Looking at just the 2010 numbers, for example, they show that the United States, with its exceptionally large share of the global population of people with incomes above the $ 20 per day development threshold (capacity),
as well
as the world's largest share of
cumulative emissions since 1990 (responsibility), is the nation with the largest share (33.1 percent) of the global RCI.
This analysis focused on the relationship between
cumulative CO2
emissions budgets and the odds of staying below 2 °C of warming, and thus had the important side effect of establishing
cumulative budgets (in this case over the 2000 - 2050 period)
as the best predictors of success for any given global
emissions pathway.
Nonetheless, it adds that
emissions reductions achieved through its credits system, known
as the Joint Crediting Mechanism, will be «appropriately counted», and will add up to a
cumulative 50 - 100m tonnes of CO2 by 2030.
Cumulative energy and industrial CO2
emissions,
as well
as the time path of
emissions, vary across models (Fig. 10c).
By comparison, they also report that Hansen's central case for a 350 ppm CO2 budget (which we used
as the basis of our 350 pathway) provides for
cumulative emissions of about 750 gigatonnes between 2000 and 2050.
For consistency, we approximate
cumulative emissions through 2015
as 560 GtC based on historical values and forecasts under RCP 8.5 (21, 22); for a special case we add 199 GtC to this total to represent the future expectation of
emissions already implicit in the current global energy infrastructure (23).
As emissions increase, a number of intervening processes occur which essentially cancel each other out, leading to the approximately linear relationship between warming and
cumulative emissions.
Solomon argued a couple of years ago that
cumulative carbon
emissions are the best way of assessing climate risk, since they avoid problems such
as time lags that mess with other measures, such
as atmospheric concentrations.
Projections of long - term committed SLR
as a function of
cumulative carbon
emissions, with 66 % CIs, assuming (triggered case) or not assuming (baseline case) that eventual collapse of the WAIS is already inevitable.
It is computed
as the coefficient of proportionality between
cumulative fossil fuel
emissions and temperature.
The issue was taken up in the same contact group
as on
cumulative fossil fuel
emissions.
The aim in limiting greenhouse gas
emissions should be to keep Earth's climate
as close
as possible to what it has been during the Holocene, say the study authors, adding that doing so depends on the
cumulative amount of
emissions released into the atmosphere throughout the industrial period, not just those emitted today.
China stressed that it has the same concerns here
as on the discussion on
cumulative fossil fuel
emissions and suggested inserting information on all RCPs.
But the value of
cumulative emission budgets
as strategic communications tools has been recognized by many groups.
Figure 1: The linear relationship between
cumulative CO2
emissions and global warming
as calculated by IPCC - class climate models.
c) Global warming
as function of
cumulative CO2
emissions.
This relationship between
cumulative emissions and warming is not perfect,
as it will change based on what happens to non-CO2 greenhouse gases, such
as methane and nitrous oxide,
as well
as how quickly climate - cooling aerosols are reduced.
This makes the calculation for the budget somewhat different, especially
as net - negative
emissions can cloud the assumptions behind the relationship between
cumulative emissions and warming.
No greater than 72 gigawatts of total
cumulative generating capacity (including industrial applications, measured by such equivalent metric
as the Administrator may designate) may receive
emission allowances under this section.
(2) Although developing countries are historically least responsible for the
cumulative greenhouse gas
emissions that are causing climate change and continue to have very low per capita greenhouse gas
emissions, their overall greenhouse gas
emissions are increasing
as they seek to grow their economies and reduce energy poverty for their populations.
According to Ward's full commentary, accepted for publication in the same journal
as Lomborg's paper, «Projections of global mean surface temperature for the period up to 2100 are based on
cumulative annual global
emissions of greenhouse gases up to the end of the century.
We have plotted most likely peak temperatures
as a function of four different
cumulative emission metrics: year 1750 — 2500 (figure 3a), year 1750 to the time at which peak warming occurs (figure 3b), year 1750 — 2100 (figure 3c) and year 1750 — 2200 (figure 3d).
This means that only two
emission targets — the peak rate and
cumulative carbon
emissions — are needed to constrain two key indicators of CO2 - induced climate change (peak warming and peak warming rate),
as evidenced by the maximum - likelihood estimation method used above.
We see that, in cases where post-2050
emissions are small, the spread is much tighter,
as shown by those pathways with
cumulative emissions less than 0.3 TtC between 2010 and 2050.
Consider two
emission pathways, both with a
cumulative total of 1 TtC, but one with a decaying
emissions floor, and one with no
emissions floor: the pathway without an
emissions floor will cause a temperature peak earlier than the pathway with the decaying floor,
as the
emissions floor causes
emissions to be emitted over a longer time period.
When the Total GHG
emissions from Annex A sources is selected
as the category, the list contains the five years of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, from 2008 to 2012 and, in addition, «
Cumulative».
This occurs because the
cumulative totals include contributions for portions of the
emissions floor that are emitted after the time of peak warming, which can have no effect on peak warming,
as illustrated by the green curves in figure 1.
Figure 3 shows the impact of
emissions floors on different
cumulative emission metrics, and each of the panels has the same form
as figure 2a.
Here, we consider how the concept of
cumulative emissions interacts with other aspects of global change, such
as emissions floors and rates of warming.
As in Allen et al. [20], this actually forces the many potential
emission pathways considered here, which have the same
cumulative total, to cross around the middle of the twenty - first century.
As fossil - based power generation is replaced with wind and solar power,
cumulative carbon
emissions from centralized power facilities will be greatly reduced.
The correlation is almost
as strong if
cumulative emissions out to 2500 are considered (shown in black squares in figure 3a) because the vast majority of the
emissions in these zero
emissions floor pathways have occurred by the time of peak warming.