Sentences with phrase «as dangerous if»

Believe it or not, your average cat would be just as dangerous if it were the same size, maybe even more.

Animal control agencies would classify dogs as dangerous if they aggressively have bitten or attacked a human, have killed or severely injured a domesticated animal or have been trained primarily for fighting.

It's easy to say that homebirths are dangerous but in reality hospital births are just as dangerous if not more.

(i'm glad that everything worked out well for you in the end) «in reality hospital births are just as dangerous if not more.»

Not exact matches

Thinking you can eat whatever you want as long as you work it off later is actually a pretty dangerous mindset, particularly if you look at the current research.

After all, the tokens, roughly the same size and weight as poker chips (and valued at 0.1 Ether, or about $ 56 apiece), could be dangerous if dropped from high.

If ISIS follows Shabaab's trajectory, the group will constantly morph, remaining dangerous even as its fortunes fade and its structure and nature change.

But we don't know — can't know — which they will be, and trying to stage - manage the economy as if you do is dangerous.

If you think of Ivan as a sort of early modern boss, you can begin to understand why a passive aggressive manager is a dangerous manager.

EpiPen is a preloaded injection of epinephrine, also known as adrenaline, used in case of a dangerous allergic reaction called anaphylaxis that could cause death if untreated.

As if nontraded REITs weren't having a bad enough year, they are now among the most dangerous products to recommend.

This provision states that no death benefit will be paid if you die as a result of your dangerous career or hobby (e.g., skydiving).

As more and more companies pull their advertisements from Fox News's The Ingraham Angle in protest of a controversial tweet from the show's host Laura Ingraham, The Hill's media reporter and opinion contributor, Joe Concha, writes that if the boycott succeeds «we've entered some dangerous territory.»

Furthermore, as Lance Roberts» chart shows, investors are highly leveraged at this time, pretty dangerous if the rout continues.

To those who call the therapy dangerous, Mr. Bitzer reverses the argument: «If I'd known about these therapies as a teen I could have avoided a lot of depression, self - hatred and suicidal thoughts,» he said at his apartment in Los Angeles.

If you knew me and what kind of churches I attend, you would be foolish to label them as a dangerous cult.

The whole thing is just folklore anyway, if people actually followed what was written in the bible originally they would be just as dangerous as the Taliban.

For one thing, these failures and problems describe the public schools as well, especially if you think some of the ideological commitments that animate a great deal of the educational establishment are dangerous in themselves.

If we are capable of extinguishing ourselves and most, if not all, other life, metaphors that support attitudes of distance from, and domination of, other human beings and nonhuman life must be recognized as dangerouIf we are capable of extinguishing ourselves and most, if not all, other life, metaphors that support attitudes of distance from, and domination of, other human beings and nonhuman life must be recognized as dangerouif not all, other life, metaphors that support attitudes of distance from, and domination of, other human beings and nonhuman life must be recognized as dangerous.

none of these prayers are dangerous, for example if you pray to become like jesus, and god downgrades your life and you lose your house and car etc, this is good, as God is happier with those who don't value the material things in this temporary world, and your only going to achieve heaven with Gods happiness

It would be too bad if just as Christianity is becoming» for the first time» a truly world religion, we encased ourselves in the confines of a passing age instead of embracing the dangerous dawning of a new one.»

That claim, if looked at very carefully is very dangerous and feeds the God - as - Remote - Control phenomena that David so aptly criticised today.

Modern politics was thus founded on the principle that religion is a private concern, useful insofar as it inculcates socially approved virtues of toleration and honesty, dangerous if vigorously pressed into the political arena.

If religious people stay out of politics and other aspects of public interest then I would say they are free to do as they please, but when they want to push their beliefs on the rest us and completely disregard the facts at the expense of our health and our planet then they become dangerous and must be challenged.

If you wonder why I am so severe with the theological tradition, as well as with the classical scientific scheme, I reply: our terrible human difficulties in this century suggest that our religious and ethical traditions are inadequate to our formidable tasks in a fast changing and dangerous technological world.

If, as he reports, all this has had little apparent impact on non-Jewish Americans, it may prove dangerous for Jews by making this horrendous period of Jewish suffering more familiar to them than their own religion.

Maybe if people realised that he was a Southern redneck evangelical Christian, we would now be having discussions on the BBC and the print media about the dangers of religion and how the Christian «Taleban» in the Southern US are as dangerous as the real Taleban in Afghanistan?

You are too ignorant to know the toy is dangerous and worthless, you scream at the slightest movement towards taking it away from you, and while it makes you dumber and dumber, you get more violent and simply grip tighter, as if that made the toy worth having.

... [Americans] have become a nation that may defy every foe but that most dangerous of foes, herself, destined to a majestic future if she will shun the excess and perversion of the principles that made her great, prate less about the enemies of the past and strive more against the enemies of the future, resist the mob and the demagogue as she resisted Parliament and King, rally her powers from the race for gold and the delirium of prosperity to make firm the foundations on which that prosperity rests, and turn some fair proportion of her vast mental forces to other objects than material progress and the game of party politics.

For if that is the case, the state can just as easily mandate the death of those it considers useless or potentially dangerous as it can mandate the life of those it considers useful or benign.

We must mark him now, if we have not done so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future of this nation from the standpoint of Communism, the Negro, and national security.»

It seems to me that if Christians took Jesus seriously, we would approach wealth with great trepidation, seeing it not as an entitled right, but as a potentially dangerous impediment to the gospel.

So there are aspects of Western Christianity that Orthodox, if they know about them, would regard as negative or dangerous.

my husband is a professed Odinist I am... what I am I hate the terms and shit, a witch I say that proud and humbly with honor BC I am ashamed of the so called goth chicks that make false claims you are or your not as in odinism, now the All Father to me was God in their religion Baal is a nasty and dangerous evil nonhuman entity if Im wrong will you please show me your source, are you Wodenist or Odinist

We were chosen to be the trustees of God's Torah, and this is why we must survive as a people, even if it entails walking a dangerous path in this world.

Regardless of one's position on the theological issues here, it's plain to see that if the members of the Southern Baptist Convention intend to hold to their exclusivist position consistently and condemn as dangerous all who seek to harmonize scripture with the human conscience, then it's time for them to confront their own theological accommodations and declare the unconverted child as hopeless as the unconverted adult.

Morality as previously known was dangerous; it could now be reinvented by television pundits and if we were smart we would not challenge their views.

To this end St Philip worked hard to invent diversions which would keep his charges occupied, especially at what he considered the most dangerous times — the long sultry Roman afternoons, and the period of the pre-Lenten carnival, when Renaissance society gave itself up to a distinctly un-Christian preparation for Lent (and if anyone doubts that Sixteenth Century Rome could be fully as immoral as our own times, let him read the Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini, a great artist, but far from a good man).

I hope that if / when the book comes out, my point will be more clear — Doctrinal Statements are good when used in their proper place, but just as with anything, they can be very dangerous if used improperly.

Equally dangerous to science, however, if not more so, are those naturalistic scientists who play essentially the same game as the creationists, i.e., seek to lend credibility to their particular worldview by attempting to clothe it in scientific garb.

We're going to go ahead and offer mercy to one another, even if it is viewed as «soft» or «cowardly» or «dangerous»... We're going to trust that Jesus is actually at work in this world like He said, and when he promised that «His kindness leads us to repentance,» we're just going to believe Him.

Yet the question still hovers over the proceedings like Poe's raven: If such concepts as natural law and natural rights are so dangerous for Judaism, why are they also so indispensable?

Preaching «god's word» can be a dangerous thing... especially if you're as dumb as this pastor is.

he asks, as if I have revealed something dangerous.

People acting as if non-violence is not an answer — but I am not saying we don't get involved — let's not pass into the idea of how much violence we will use — because that's dangerous «evil» territory — allow a little in and soon we are talking about how much gunshots fired into a person is «normal»?

If we depend on the bible to direct us, that is a dangerous ground as there are very many convincing arguments and ongoing debates about the Bible.

But there are other spiritual reasons to handle serpents, practitioners say, often describing the dangerous rituals as a mental and emotional rush, as if they were touching the hand of God.

If he truly believed in demons (as every well - catechized Catholic should), he would never risk «provoking the Lord to jealousy» by participating in such a sinful and spiritually dangerous pagan ritual.

Yet if there is such a thing as truth in our beliefs and practices, then ignoring those truths is not an expression of mercy, but a form of spiritually damaging confusion — dangerous for the individual, and dangerous for the believing community as a whole.

«Completely healed» or «as if it never happened» are unlikely and could even be dangerous in that they would make you vulnerable to re-victimization.