Sentences with phrase «as disagreeing with you on»

I didn't read Alice as disagreeing with you on that point.

Not exact matches

The delay came as the free trade wing of the White House, led by Cohn, disagreed with trade hawks in the administration on whether to impose tariffs.
It's based on the writings of Carl Jung and categorizes people into one of 16 different four - letter types using a series of agree - or - disagree scenarios, such as, «you tend to be unbiased even if it might endanger your good relations with people» or «failing to complete your task on time makes you uncomfortable.»
FLAKE: There are a lot of things I disagreed with President Obama on with regard to foreign policy, and domestic policy as well.
As a general rule, the more rungs on the ladder that separate you and an employee, the less likely that employee will be to disagree with you.
The solution: A lot of this behavior is blamed on helicopter parenting as of late, and I won't disagree with that.
«As a matter of principle, therefore, we respectfully disagree with the CNIL's assertion of global authority on this issue and we have asked the CNIL to withdraw its formal notice,» wrote Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy counsel.
Spicer, the embattled White House press secretary, resigned on July 21 after telling Trump he vehemently disagreed with the selection of Scaramucci as White House communications director.
As media and technology scholar Zeynep Tufekci writes on Medium, «You are seeing fewer news items that you'd disagree with which are shared by your friends because the algorithm is not showing them to you.»
I slightly disagree with the author as I feel its too risky to buy investment properties that has negative cashflow from day 1, despite his examples shows that on the long term it works out.
Other Christians invoke images of persecution when someone disagrees with them on controversial issues such as abortion or birth control, says Moss, whose «The Myth of Persecution» was recently released.
Dr. Oz, who rarely disagrees with the queen of talk shows, told both Oprah and Fox to brace themselves, as he had something provocative to say on stem cells: Adult stem cells are the way of the future.
As Muslim we don't need to be kissing asses to make the USA happy but rather we need honestly show them where we disagree with them so can reach an understanding based on respect.
I disagree with my Bishop quite often on various topics, but support him in his role as Bishop.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
As far as the Kingdom of God being inside you, this has been discussed for 2000 years, and though you may have come to the conclussion that Jesus was saying this in Luke 17 there are many that would disagree with you on thiAs far as the Kingdom of God being inside you, this has been discussed for 2000 years, and though you may have come to the conclussion that Jesus was saying this in Luke 17 there are many that would disagree with you on thias the Kingdom of God being inside you, this has been discussed for 2000 years, and though you may have come to the conclussion that Jesus was saying this in Luke 17 there are many that would disagree with you on this.
Dr. Peter Boghossian, professor of philosophy at Portland State University, in a great talk on faith - based epistemology: «I disagree with granting religious delusion as an exemption, and I want to mention there's a budding young scholar here at Portland State University, Renee Barnett [sp?]
1) Do more research on what the Catholic Church has endorsed such as Obamacare (for which I totally disagree with the Church)
I remember disagreeing at times with both of them online (although sometimes also agreeing) I'm no - one and not even in the conversation anymore I don't believe and just spectate allot of what goes on these day's but I wan na own my own misogyny as I continue to try and unpick and leave it behind.
[I disagree with the assertion that Mars Hill is a cult, but I think Fred's point about our tendency to see sexual betrayal as bad «because it involves sex rather than because it involves betrayal» is spot - on, and his concerns about Driscoll's preoccupation with sex and power are, of course, warranted.]
As expected, I don't agree with everything he says, but then, as you and I are finding, none of us agree on everything, and sometimes, we even disagree with ourselves over time..As expected, I don't agree with everything he says, but then, as you and I are finding, none of us agree on everything, and sometimes, we even disagree with ourselves over time..as you and I are finding, none of us agree on everything, and sometimes, we even disagree with ourselves over time....
But it does appear to be true that, as Dias wrote, InterVarsity will maintain doctrinal accountability by asking any staff who disagree with IVCF's conservative stance on homosexuality, same - sex relationships, and gender to inform their leadership, triggering a process of «involuntary termination.»
The willingness to classify political views which should be respected, such as leaving or staying in the EU, as «extreme», shows the danger of focusing the extremism debate on beliefs we may find uncomfortable or disagree with, rather than on actions that threaten lives.»
Neither bothers to say where and why they disagree with Krein and Pappin on economics, something that might help clarify the cultural differences as well.
Your spiritual experience is valid to me, and most Pagans don't think of other religious traditions as being «wrong»; we just disagree with anyone who thinks they have a stranglehold on the truth.
As you can see, Christians advocating for the preservation of slavery did not characterize their abolitionist opponents as simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at alAs you can see, Christians advocating for the preservation of slavery did not characterize their abolitionist opponents as simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at alas simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at all.
Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?
And why should I, as a faithful lay member of the Church, have to disagree with the Church as represented by its shepherds when I make judgments of fact and feasibility, judgments on which people of goodwill may disagree?
So, I guess I am wondering... as you obviously disagree with Jeremy on this doctrinal point, does that mean you get a pass on loving him?
@Timothy — I don't recall using any foul, or even abusive words; unless you consider disagreeing with you, based on solid evidence, as being hurtful.
Yes, Milward disagrees with Wilson and with Asquith on this and that interpretation (as I have noted in my review), but all proceed from the common assumption that Shakespeare has hidden Catholic meanings in his plays that each can decipher.
For instance, Christians disagree about the equal rights of men and women — which the Universal Declaration affirms — even as some Christians differ on this point with some Muslims (who also differ about this among themselves)
People are asked to rate themselves on a seven - point scale from «completely agree» to «completely disagree» with such statements as, «When shopping, I have a hard time finding clothing that I really love» or «Whenever I watch TV, I channel surf.»
while I agree with parts of what you've stated such as: the bible is MOSTLY a book on God and human relationship, I would disagree with you as to whether it's a «good» book on the other issues.
As a Christian, I am aware that some other Christians, who love the Lord with the same sincerity as I do, disagree with me on this issuAs a Christian, I am aware that some other Christians, who love the Lord with the same sincerity as I do, disagree with me on this issuas I do, disagree with me on this issue.
Everyone makes their own decision at some point, so as much as I love Bill Nye, I disagree with him on this topic, as parents should teach their children however they want and in high school the kids will make their own choices.
Although they have used feminist language at times, their opposition to pornography stems much more from their nostalgia for a «purer» America, and they disagree with feminists on crucial issues such as sex education and day care.
You're seriously flawed in your assessment of me, many would disagree with you but then again you have no clue as to who I am - just a few lines on an anonymous blog... kudos for judging a person based on that and that alone.
As with the two - volume work, although I agree with nearly everything Greg writes in the book, I once again found myself disagreeing with the central idea... that God withdraws from Jesus on the cross, and therefore, in the violent portions of the OT, God is withdrawing Himself from the people and nations who experience / suffer violence.
An August 2010 poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that nearly half of Tea Party supporters (46 %) had not heard of or did not have an opinion about «the conservative Christian movement sometimes known as the religious right»; 42 % said they agree with the conservative Christian movement and roughly one - in - ten (11 %) said they disagree (based on registered voters).
She confesses to experiencing a distinct pleasure every time she reads in the paper, «Disagreeing with the Pope, Father Charles Curran of Southern Methodist University said...» It does seem to reduce his already reduced credibility as an authority on Catholic faith and life.
Sayer's biography has more detail than Wilson's, disagrees with Wilson on some points, is not as readable or as witty and does not attempt to probe Lewis's psyche in the way Wilson does.
Why hasn't this piece been put on the main CNN web page for all to see how violence is not only being committed by conservatives as the media pretends but also by the gay rights proponents who hate others that disagree with their political views!
Dr. Oz, who rarely disagrees with the queen of talk shows, told both Oprah and Fox to brace themselves, as he had something provocative to say on stem cells: adult stem cells are the way of the future.
As soon as we start shunning certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more reasons to shun everybody who disagrees with us on almost anythinAs soon as we start shunning certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more reasons to shun everybody who disagrees with us on almost anythinas we start shunning certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more reasons to shun everybody who disagrees with us on almost anything.
As someone who has participated in more college commencements than he'd care to remember, and who has written and delivered an honorary doctorate citation for a political figure with whom he quite vehemently disagreed, I think I have some advice for my colleagues on other campuses.
He found himself disagreeing with the Church on everything from the role of women to the concept of original sin and what he saw as the Catholic Church's dependence on guilt as a motivating factor.
Frankly, I often disagree with fellow believers on how they try to legislate their interpretation of scripture, but the governance of a civil society is never going to be uninfluenced by people of faith as long as it is a democracy.
I think often we read ourselves as Jesus and others as the Pharisees too — I don't think I've heard many sermons taking what Jesus says to the Pharisees as a direct challenge to us, as opposed to assuming that we're on Jesus» side and confronting those who disagree with us.
I disagree with him, however, on the one point where he makes common cause with Pannenberg: namely, that apart from the apocalyptic horizon, the disciples» experiences can only be regarded as subjective hallucinations.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z