What man has written in the past as his Scriptures and
as his dogmatic statements were expressions that more or less captured the experience of faith that was his at a particular moment in time.
Not exact matches
In fact, the more cast - iron you are with what you believe,
as you seem to be by all the
dogmatic statements you have made, the easier it is for something to tip the balance and cause you to remove yourself.
Brown delighted this reviewer with his appreciation of the Psalter and would delight any right - minded Calvinist with his appreciation of Karl Barth's
statement in Church
Dogmatics IV, 2:
as a poor man, writes Barth, Christ «shares
as such the strange destiny which falls on God in His people and the world — to be the One who is ignored and forgotten and despised and discounted by men.
I imagine the following
statement could get the same treatment
as «dogma» and «
dogmatic» — round and round it goes.
I am sure your
statement is true but I guess what I found interesting was that for some atheist they are just
as dogmatic as the religious folks.
The problem with scientific naturalism
as a worldview is that it takes a sound methodological premise of natural science and transforms it into a
dogmatic statement about the nature of the universe.
Some will protest that
statements such
as these are «
dogmatic.»
I'd say the latter part of the
statement certainly applies almost exclusively to religion, but the first part could apply just
as well to any
dogmatic belief system, especially political.
After all, «in philosophical discussion, the merest hint of
dogmatic certainty
as to finality of
statement is an exhibition of folly» (PR xiv).
Are you saying that we depend completely on God and in His mercy alone, to bring about crisis for change or, is this yet another
dogmatic statement disguised
as a question??? So, there's NOTHING I can do to change me....
As with any
dogmatic statements, there are a lot of «buts» and «ifs» around it.
Their own
Dogmatic Postulation of CO2CAGW «tenets», which in effect constitute an instant litmus test for defining Believers
as against «deniers», and their incessant repetition of
statements which publicly preach a Liturgy involving a coming Apocalypse, both contribute to bringing their Ideology very close to constituting at least some kind of Religion.