Sentences with phrase «as duties of fairness»

Indigenous law frequently engages principles of administrative law, such as duties of fairness.

Not exact matches

The NDP could have framed this debate as one of protecting Alberta jobs and an Alberta - based company, rather than just about cancelling a contract with a giant Australian company (it was later announced that an appeal panel determined that Alberta Health Services breached its duty of procedural fairness in the RFP process in a substantive manner).

President Osinbajo swears in Walter Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria; urges him to uphold justice, fairness and truthfulness while performing his duties Restore public confidence in the justice system, Ag.

«As a senior prosecutor — and most recently as Acting District Attorney — he has demonstrated a clear commitment to justice and fairness, as well as an understanding of the difficult and unique nature of a police officer's duties.&raquAs a senior prosecutor — and most recently as Acting District Attorney — he has demonstrated a clear commitment to justice and fairness, as well as an understanding of the difficult and unique nature of a police officer's duties.&raquas Acting District Attorney — he has demonstrated a clear commitment to justice and fairness, as well as an understanding of the difficult and unique nature of a police officer's duties.&raquas well as an understanding of the difficult and unique nature of a police officer's duties.&raquas an understanding of the difficult and unique nature of a police officer's duties.»

Equity also imposed a duty of fairness on solicitors in contracting with clients, requiring the solicitor to establish, for example, that the client understood the agreement, that the price was reasonable, and «that the transaction was in all respects fair, and such as an independent solicitor who had performed his duty, would have advised his client to enter into.»

Originally cast in terms of inherent authority to control the processes of the court and prevention of abuse of the process, it is today recognized that a trial judge has a duty to manage the trial process balancing fairness to the parties as well as efficient and orderly discharge of court process.

The starting point is that the decision - maker is under a duty of transparency and fairness (which in this case required full disclosure of the model and underlying data); it should not normally give undertakings as to confidentiality in respect of material that fairness dictates it should disclose as part of its consultation.

If they would not give evidence, dangerous criminals would walk free and both society and the administration of justice would suffer; (ii) it was settled law that the paramount object had always been to do justice and that if, in order to do justice, some adaptation of ordinary procedure was called for, it should be made, so long as the overall fairness of the trial was not compromised; (iii) recent case law supported the adoption of protective measures; (iv) the Strasbourg jurisprudence, properly understood, did not condemn the use of protective measures; and (v) the defendant was protected from the risk of unfairness by the prosecutor's duty of disclosure.

Except where there is a «red flag» prompting further inquiry, such as an obvious error in the material or where information has come to light which casts a doubt on the reliability or integrity of the facts or opinions in the underlying material, there was no duty to examine the procedural fairness of investigations upon which facts and opinions in a reference were based.

[116] The duty of procedural fairness would also require the ACO to outline what procedure it would undertake in making its determination, what evidence is required to meet the trigger test, as well as to convey the deadlines applying to the ACO's procedure -LSB-...].

As such, the only duty of fairness that arises on parties that is the one in connection with disclosing their individual financial situations.

As such, there did not appear to be a duty of fairness owed to the SMC.

The court also noted three considerations: (1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by non-disclosure; (2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure; and (3) its impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted.