RFF research has informed the design of a number of these policies and RFF experts are continuing to look at how states and regions design climate initiatives, manage issues such
as emissions leakage and competitiveness concerns, and balance economic and environmental goals.
Not exact matches
Finding a plug for «
leakage» Harstad's theory builds upon the concept of «carbon
leakage,» which holds that countries opting out of climate agreements will produce more greenhouse gases
as their neighbors take steps to ratchet down greenhouse gas
emissions and regulate the sources of such
emissions, like coal - burning industrial plants or motor vehicle fleets.
When faced with environmental regulations and the costs they impose, companies may relocate to a less - regulated jurisdiction, taking with them jobs and contributing to «
leakage» in which targets of regulation, such
as carbon
emissions, are not reduced, just redistributed.
We find (i) measurements at all scales show that official inventories consistently underestimate actual CH4 [methane]
emissions, with the natural gas and oil sectors
as important contributors; (ii) many independent experiments suggest that a small number of «super-emitters» could be responsible for a large fraction of
leakage; (iii) recent regional atmospheric studies with very high
emissions rates are unlikely to be representative of typical natural gas system
leakage rates; and (iv) assessments using 100 - year impact indicators show system - wide
leakage is unlikely to be large enough to negate climate benefits of coal - to - natural gas substitution.
The «climate pragmatists,» such
as Victor, Stern, and myself, argue that the point of Australian climate policy is not to solve the global climate problem, or to solve the problem of
emissions from international trade, but rather to achieve politically feasible forward progress on domestic climate policy that can help set the foundation for future global policy (which
as you and Victor have pointed out is the only way to deal with
leakage, including coal exports).
Hence, the
emission reduction achieved by the policy would be partially offset by a net increase in foreign
emissions, a phenomenon known
as carbon
leakage.
-- The term «carbon
leakage» means any substantial increase (
as determined by the Administrator) in greenhouse gas
emissions by industrial entities located in other countries if such increase is caused by an incremental cost of production increase in the United States resulting from the implementation of this title.
So, although methane
leakage reduces the short - term
emissions benefit of switching from coal to gas — and should be addressed for that reason — it does not limit natural gas's potential
as a bridge fuel to a low - carbon future.
-- The term «carbon
leakage» means any substantial increase (
as determined by the Secretary) in greenhouse gas
emissions --
Emissions leakage occurs when sources outside of a carbon pricing system increase economic activity and associated emissions as a result of tha
Emissions leakage occurs when sources outside of a carbon pricing system increase economic activity and associated
emissions as a result of tha
emissions as a result of that system.
This is a crucial issue because if land
emissions and removals are accounted under the same rules
as other sectors (like the energy sector for example), it implies that sequestered carbon is permanent and has no
leakage of
emissions.
He believes that ETS reforms could scare big emitting industries such
as steel making and cement production to leave the EU taking the associated
emissions out of a regulated market, a process referred to
as carbon
leakage.
As an example, supermarkets use HFCs to cool and freeze food; average annual
leakage of HFCs from supermarkets equal the climate impact of the
emissions of more than 300 cars.
While (negative)
leakage leads to a discount of
emission reductions
as verified, positive spill - over may not in all cases be accounted for.
Carbon
leakage may occur through changes in trading patterns, and that is sometimes measured
as the balance of
emissions embodied in trade (BEET).
However, imposing a carbon tax or other policy to reduce
emissions in one country can lead to increased
emissions elsewhere — a phenomenon known
as carbon
leakage.
«Carbon
leakage is defined
as the increase in CO2
emissions outside the countries taking domestic mitigation action divided by the reduction in the
emissions of these countries.»
CRITICISMS Among the criticisms of the CDM is the risk of non-additionality — that companies will be rewarded for projects that do not in fact lead to an overall reduction in
emissions, or that a project will reduce
emissions but that other
emissions will increase elsewhere (known
as leakage).
Last but not least a Danish researcher reviewed the potential for
leakage and concluded that the «dangers of carbon sequestration are real and the development of this technique should not be used
as an argument for continued high fossil fuel
emissions.
As I understand it, though, there has been an uptick in recent years, and before that stabilization may have been partly due to reduced
emissions of methane (including natural gas
leakage) from human activity.
There have been a near surfeit of reports recently looking at the greenhouse gas
emissions of natural gas, most of which have concluded that, to varying degrees, we're underestimating
emissions, the effects of methane
leakage on those, and natural gas isn't always
as climate - friendly
as claimed.
Several key issues were highlighted for further study, including
leakage of
emissions to nearby states, the role of forestry offsets, and the role of electrification
as a method for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions across the economy.»
Leakage is a big issue for RGGI — initial carbon - cap runs showed that leakage could offset 60 - 90 % of RGGI's emission reductions, as power plants in nearby states increase their output to sell into the higher - priced RGGI power m
Leakage is a big issue for RGGI — initial carbon - cap runs showed that
leakage could offset 60 - 90 % of RGGI's emission reductions, as power plants in nearby states increase their output to sell into the higher - priced RGGI power m
leakage could offset 60 - 90 % of RGGI's
emission reductions,
as power plants in nearby states increase their output to sell into the higher - priced RGGI power markets.