Sentences with phrase «as employers get»

The various sections should be separated carefully as employers get little time to go through the resume.

This sometimes is more important that just highlighting professional strengths, as employers get to know you as a person.

Not exact matches

«Just because you're terminating someone because they're not work authorized anymore doesn't mean you get out of your obligations as an employer,» says Siskind Susser's Greg Siskind.

Not so at RFRK, which has increased both its employee retention (in the high - turnover food - service industry, no less) and its rep as an employer of choice (the firm recently got 350 applications for an admin position) by making its people feel something very powerful: that their work matters.

«We've got a lot more [leverage] as an employer right now, and we're taking advantage of it,» he says.

Similar disdain followed January layoff announcements from Pfizer, Walmart, Microsoft, Coca - Cola, and many less prominent employers, coalescing into an angry narrative: Greedy companies are firing workers just days after getting a historically giant tax cut that will save them billions — a tax cut that was promoted by President Trump and Republicans as a job creator.

Finally, if one of your staff members has an outside source of violence directed at them, such as domestic abuse, the employer itself can get a restraining order to make the work environment safer for that person.

The small business package includes Recruiter Lite, a more affordable version of LinkedIn's signature recruiting software; as well as the ability to post sponsored job listings that get 30 to 50 percent more applicants; and create a custom employer page and targeted ads to spread the company talent brand and turn existing employees into brand ambassadors.

As an employer, if you want to keep an employee who is getting paid lower than the average, you either should have a great company culture or a well - known brand recognition.

«An employer — especially a manager — must be very specific as to why an employee is not getting a raise.

Ultimately, having aligned values means that you, as an employer, and your employees are in general agreement on what you both stand for, where you are heading, and how you will get there.

As the owner of the Caremark pharmacy benefits manager (which negotiates reimbursement rates with drugmakers on behalf of employers), CVS benefits from a steady flow of customers coming into its stores as they get pick up prescriptionAs the owner of the Caremark pharmacy benefits manager (which negotiates reimbursement rates with drugmakers on behalf of employers), CVS benefits from a steady flow of customers coming into its stores as they get pick up prescriptionas they get pick up prescriptions.

If an employee gets in an accident as a result of a client meeting, the employer could be held responsible if that employee was encouraged to drink as a part of winning clients.

As you read about, practice, and get a handle on these SEM skills, you'll eventually be able to add SEM literacy to your resume, and — regardless of whether you're looking to work as a web designer or a web developer — boost your value to potential clients and employerAs you read about, practice, and get a handle on these SEM skills, you'll eventually be able to add SEM literacy to your resume, and — regardless of whether you're looking to work as a web designer or a web developer — boost your value to potential clients and employeras a web designer or a web developer — boost your value to potential clients and employers.

As the economy gets more stable and startups are being taken more seriously, employers are getting creative with the benefits they offer — and candidates are loving it.

There's an excellent chance you'll get the employer's own website back as one of the top search results.

During their working years, most people get their insurance through their employers as a benefit.

This «fame» is more likely to get her Twitter feed noticed by future prospective employers, who can visit her feed to find such gems as «once a n *** a proves he cant b loyal drop him and save yourself before its too late,» and a number of similarly piquant expressions that demonstrate the kind of personal brand she would be bringing to a prospective job.

The brand's fans and a handful of fashion bloggers, such as Marie Denee (aka The Curvy Fashionista), expressed their shock and displeasure on social media, prompting a team of former employers and new players to get back in the game.

When setting up the business make sure you get the tax id, otherwise known as an EIN (Employer Identification Number).

On the other hand, with a $ 4,000 employer contribution to the employee's plan, the employee gets the full $ 4,000 now and the employer gets to deduct the $ 4,000 as a business expense.

When you get a new job, you'll find out if your employer offers a 401 (k) plan as part of your benefits package.

Meanwhile, I was able to get foreign language training in Mandarin for a year as well, all paid for by my employer.

If you are getting that FREE MONEY from your employer through the 401k match, I would suggest you both open up a Roth as well.

As a remote employer, you have to also trust your employees to get their work done without having a boss physically breathing down their neck.

If you work at a company that offers a 401K plan invest as much as you can in the plan up to the $ 18,000 maximum or at least invest as much as you can to get an employer match.

The changes wrought by the proposed legislation will have a much bigger effect on some groups — especially those who get insurance through their employers and those on Medicaid — than estimated by recent analysis from independent healthcare policy experts such as the Brookings Institution and credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings

Then again, as the labor market tightens, it will get harder for employers to get away with that kind of thing, and there will be more pressure to use the money for wages.

I also contribute towards 401K account in order to get employer's match and help lower taxes as well.

To get approved, customers fill in employment and personal information such as months at employer, gross annual income, and position.

Using round numbers as an example, an employee earning $ 100,000 contributing 5 % can sock away $ 5,000 and get a 100 % return on their money if the employer matches that contribution.

So far as I can tell, the Dungan study assumes that employers — and workers — get no immediate offset to the required increase in the CPP premiums.

The best way to take advantage of a 401 (k) is to make sure you are contributing enough to get the employer match, which is essentially free money toward your retirement provided by your employer (as an incentive to save, plus employers receive tax benefits for contributing to employees» retirement accounts).

Second, the employers in the new second category who are nonprofits that «hold themselves out as religious» do not get to «opt out» at all, if by that is meant that their employees are not covered by the mandate; they get the new (essentially fake) «accommodation.»

@ El Flaco... the Protestant secretary needs to realize that her employer is a Catholic organization which does not believe in contraceptives, and they (as well as ANY employer) should not be forced into paying for services, as this is what it is, a service, not a medical necessity... yes, even for those women that use it to regulate periods, get rid of cramps heavy bleeding, etc..

CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of religious beliefs.

Washington (CNN)- Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of religious beliefs.

Just as they have the freedom to get another job if they want to wear their crosses, you women are free to go to another university or employer if you want insurance that provides contraceptives and abortions.

They get angry, kill their spouses, steal from their employer, beat their kids, just as often as those who are not Christians.

And employers try to get the work they need done as inexpensively as possible.

Trying to get a pay raise or promotion involves commending himself to his employer both personally and as a scientist.

Do we not do the same when we are disciplined by our parents as children or by our employer when we call ourselves adults, don't we want to «get our own back» don't we relish it when they become ill or have an accident and we say «it serves them right» justice has been done.

It was only when, through a prearranged plan, the man's wife told him she was leaving if he didn't follow through on getting help, his employer announced that he was through unless he got help and stopped drinking, and the psychiatrist informed him that he would not be accepted as a patient unless he agreed to stay long enough to allow for effective therapy, that the man admitted he was licked and needed help.

As soon as he makes it mandatory that all welfare recipient who pop out babies to get more of my tax dollars then I will agree with making it mandatory for any church or employer to provide iAs soon as he makes it mandatory that all welfare recipient who pop out babies to get more of my tax dollars then I will agree with making it mandatory for any church or employer to provide ias he makes it mandatory that all welfare recipient who pop out babies to get more of my tax dollars then I will agree with making it mandatory for any church or employer to provide it.

«More veterans are coming back from war and getting back to work in the civilian job force, thanks to efforts by both employers and the government, as well as the improving economy.»

As an employer, should I get to decide what my employees do with their pay?

The boss will want to get his new player settled in as much as possible before we take on Cech's former club Chelsea in the Community Shield and I am sure that the 33 - year old will be keen to impress and prove to his former team mates and employers, as well as the rest of the football world, that there is still a lot to come from him.

employers get to have a say in terms as well.

As Uche Edochie has said, you're not going to get straight answers from anyone until terms have been signed, and the player / coach / whoever has officially changed employer and started work according to their new contract.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...