Of course, the Conservatives will not be doing this on subjects such
as equal marriage, Europe or renewable energy; but that appears to be of no concern to the strategists.
Not exact matches
«
As a practising Christian, a protestant and a unionist who is engaged to a Catholic Irishwoman, for me,
equal marriage isn't about one religion, country or community.
A question,
as i am curious... Should the «laws» change in relationship to the issue of gay's being allowed
marriage, and full
equal rights, would you and the Mormon Church come out and «change it's position and say, we are following our government and it's laws which say it (gay
marriage) is o.k..
To hold that same - sex
marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the
equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long
as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.
I therefore conclude that you make
equal argumentation against second
marriages (
as compared to homosexual
marriage).
They are entitled to
equal rights
as to
marriage, during
marriage and at its dissolution.
In response, we believe in building strong
marriages with our spouses and children
as we start our own families, but wonder what this has to do with fighting against
equal protection for gay couples.
Civil unions (providing most of the same benefits
as marriage with a different name) are better, because a «separate but
equal» institution is always constitutional.
New York's recent legalization of gay
marriage is being hailed by many
as a watershed moment in the history of the fight for
equal rights for same sex couples.
While some have lauded Pence for taking steps to guard his
marriage, many are pushing back, claiming that such rules reduce women to sexual temptations and prevent Pence from interacting with women in key roles
as equals.
Their strategy is to bombard us we
as much rhetoric
as possible until we submit and part from the Biblical truth and the definition of
marriage.1 man + 1 woman in covenant with God =
equal Holy Matrimony or commonly put
marriage.
It is unlikely that Pope Paul VI or any of the bishops in 1968 would have imagined that within a few decades a substantial proportion of Catholic parents in some Western countries would be living together outside of
marriage or that the Church in those countries would be defending her rights against those who claim that homosexual partnerships must be treated
as being of
equal value with
marriage.
And I feel it is the responsibility of us gay people not to want to have «
marriage» because we feel we need this to be
equal but to really imagine how a gay relationship can become a blessing not only to the partners but also to the greater society and define it
as something new and leave
marriage as what it is — a holy union between a man and a woman.
As a matter of fact I believe in Gay
marriage, I think everyone should have
equal rights... even
equal rights at free speech.
showing increased love to gays and lesbians, but not accepting their activities
as equal to god - ordained
marriage.
Its warrant for this claim is that social changes, including recognition of the
equal dignity and rights of women, «have worked deep transformations in the structure of
marriage, affecting aspects of
marriage once viewed
as essential» (2, my emphasis).
The Defense of
Marriage Act decision used rather sweeping language about
equal protection and human dignity
as they apply to the recognition of same - sex unions.
Additionally and relatedly, the Church's opposition to same - sex
marriage, to abortion, and to euthanasia are presented by the liberal commentariat, that has also been the main cheerleader for the «Yes» campaign,
as indicating its unfitness to be part of a «new,
equal, just and progressive Scotland.»
It started a couple of days ago when I popped off on my Facebook page about how much I wished there was a really great
marriage conference for people whose
marriages are more like our own — theologians call it «egalitarian» meaning that we believe in a
marriage of
equals, that we are co-leaders and our
marriage is more about lifting each other up and following Jesus together
as one.
Before he got find out
as the hypocrite that he was, and gay
marriage equals pedophilia?
Hence,
marriage can not be morally healthy
as an institution until women secure
equal status in our society.
She does, however, prove that Wright is right to argue
as he does when she employs the question - begging phrase «
marriage equality,»
as though it were entirely settled that a same - sex couple and an opposite - sex couple are «
equal» so far
as the union called «
marriage» is concerned.
As if you're supposed to wait till
marriage to have sex only to find out you're not compatible with your spouse in bed so now you have to FORCE yourself to feel passionate toward someone who doesn't turn you on and therefore that
equals «hot sex».
There is little in the undisputed epistles that could be seen
as misogynist, indeed Paul's view of
marriage is remarkable for its
equal treatment of husband and wife and the recognition of the ministry of women.
Q: Your paper indicates that if more states allow same - sex
marriage, it's just
as likely that gays and lesbians may specialize and follow gendered division of labor instead of maintaining their more
equal partnerships.
Q: You note that perhaps we shouldn't «idealize»
marriage as an
equal partnership and just accept specialization.
As much as we love the idea of men being an equal partner in a marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the idea of men being an equal partner in a divorc
As much
as we love the idea of men being an equal partner in a marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the idea of men being an equal partner in a divorc
as we love the idea of men being an
equal partner in a
marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the idea of men being an
equal partner in a divorce.
At yesterday's inaugural speech, President Obama strongly hinted that he may endorse
marriage for gays and lesbians
as an
equal right under the Constitution: «Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law, for if we are truly created
equal, then surely the love we -LSB-...]
As my HuffPo piece today,» Why
marriage isn't an
equal partnership,» illuminates, we still are stuck in the «Mad Men» era when men are the providers and women deal with the poopy diapers and dust bunnies, even if she's CEO of a start - up.
So,
as Wildess says, maybe we should stop idealizing
marriage as something that's
equal and realize it's more efficient to specialize.
Policy formulation that sees
marriage as the only good relationship format for commitment seems, therefore, to be rather short - sighted and ill - informed when other relationship forms, such
as cohabitation or living apart together, can involve
equal if not more commitment.
As for gays seeking
marriage, there are many laws under which they are denied
equal justice.
For Daryl, that is a very real possibility: «I don't see
marriage as an option until the (divorce) laws are
equal.
Marriage without sex and physical affection is nothing more than a contractually - binding friendship that absent of an
equal share of housework and income is a lopsided agreement, always favoring the party who has backed out of the sexual and physical affection aspect of the relationship (barring reasons such
as a failure to maintain physical appearance, substance abuse, or unwarranted infidelity).
The difference between a parent - child relationship and an adult - adult relationship, such
as marriage, is that the child is at a dissimilar developmental stage and is psychologically unable to provide
equal relationship give - and - take.
As such, he managed to line up a larger number of progressive voters, but disapproval of the current government and a 67 % of Costa Ricans opposing
equal marriage have made it hard to extend his support base.
As a result, Sean has pledged to fight endlessly for the freedom of the LGBT community, supporting
equal marriage rights and fighting discrimination in the job and housing markets.
As well as briefing against the Equal Love campaign, Stonewall also exaggerated the cost of equal marriage rights; making absurd, unfounded claims that it would cost billions of pound
As well
as briefing against the Equal Love campaign, Stonewall also exaggerated the cost of equal marriage rights; making absurd, unfounded claims that it would cost billions of pound
as briefing against the
Equal Love campaign, Stonewall also exaggerated the cost of equal marriage rights; making absurd, unfounded claims that it would cost billions of po
Equal Love campaign, Stonewall also exaggerated the cost of
equal marriage rights; making absurd, unfounded claims that it would cost billions of po
equal marriage rights; making absurd, unfounded claims that it would cost billions of pounds.
Hanna stood out nationally
as the only Republican in Congress to support same - sex
marriage, a woman's right to an abortion and the
Equal Rights Amendment, guaranteeing equal rights for w
Equal Rights Amendment, guaranteeing
equal rights for w
equal rights for women.
And should it be used to persecute a minority that is simply seeking
equal rights?If you are going to selectively use your Bible to justify hating homosexuals and our quest for
marriage equality, then why do you happen to ignore many many other parts of the Bible such
as: the Biblical support of slavery (Luke 12:47 - 48, Ephesians 6:5, 1 Timothy 6:1 - 2), selling your daughters into slavery (Exodus 21:7 - 11), Biblical Incest (Genosis 19:36), Biblical polygamy (1 Kings 11:3), Forbidding women to speak in church (I Cor 14:34 - 35), stoning stubborn children (Duet 21:18 - 2), stoning your daughter if she loses her virginity out of wedlock (Deut 22:20 - 21) or killing the children born out of affairs (Rev 2:22 - 23).
ANDREW HARROP:
As the Supreme Court hears the case for
equal civil partnerships, our general secretary argues that inequality runs deep within the institution of
marriage.
Hanna, of Barneveld in Oneida County, stood out
as the only Republican in Congress to support a combination of abortion rights, same - sex
marriage and the
Equal Rights Amendment, guaranteeing equal rights for w
Equal Rights Amendment, guaranteeing
equal rights for w
equal rights for women.
As if they needed a conversation starter: Clinton has opposed same - sex
marriage while otherwise saying the proper things about
equal rights, a stance that's earned her considerable scorn locally.
According to John Bercow, there were even some firsts in the chamber, when Jack Matthews said, «Mr Speaker,
as someone who hasn't even had his first proper snog yet, I'm not even sure I am qualified to talk about
equal marriage.»
As I have suggested before, my expectation is that, as was the case with civil partnerships, once the equal marriage proposals are implemented and the sky does not fall in, the ban on marriages taking place on religious premises will be lifted in due course to
As I have suggested before, my expectation is that,
as was the case with civil partnerships, once the equal marriage proposals are implemented and the sky does not fall in, the ban on marriages taking place on religious premises will be lifted in due course to
as was the case with civil partnerships, once the
equal marriage proposals are implemented and the sky does not fall in, the ban on
marriages taking place on religious premises will be lifted in due course too.
«Mr Speaker,
as someone who hasn't even had his first proper snog yet, I'm not even sure I am qualified to talk about
equal marriage», Grace - Anne and Nisha report from the UKYP Debates 2012
Struggling with my traditionalist view of
marriage and my deep rooted values to treat all people with respect and
as equals, I believe after much deliberation, I am doing the right thing in voting to support
marriage equality.
For me to support
marriage equality, however, it was imperative that the legislation contain all the necessary religious exemptions, so
as not to interfere with religious beliefs which I hold
as important
as equal rights.
As Culture Secretary, you have played a critical role in advancing Britain's proud record of respect and equality in piloting the
Equal Marriage Act through Parliament and onto the Statute Book.
As the UK
equal marriage debate heated up, I sat in on a meeting between Anna Grodzka, at present Europe's only known transgender MP, and Kate Green, Labour frontbencher with responsibility for equalities.