Sentences with phrase «as errors when»

Not exact matches

Budget 2015 left very little margin for error when it came to balancing the books, with a projected surplus of $ 1.4 billion plus an additional $ 1.0 billion as a contingency reserve, giving the federal government a $ 2.4 billion margin for error.

This reduces the need for a middle person, such as a cashier, who could potentially introduce error into the process — i.e. give you a Double Double Cheeseburger when all you wanted was a hamburger.

The moral Contrasting Ms. Bachmann's remarks to the panicky claims by Mr. Geithner and Hank Paulson in September 2008 confirm a basic axiom of today's junk economics: When an economic error becomes so widespread that it is adopted as official government policy, there is always a special interest at work to promote it.

I felt manipulated when reading newsletters as they always seemed to be touting their successes while sweeping the errors into an unseen corner.

We regard digital currency payments as «accepted» when one block confirmation has been registered, however, due to varying security between blockchains, we reserve the right to require additional block confirmations to reduce risk of fraudulent double spending attempts or errors related to forks.

Reversing a transfer can happen as quickly as the same day of the error or as long as a few weeks, depending on when the bank takes notice.

The errors in estimating the costs of the war, the incompetent planning for the occupation, and the failure to understand the sheer length of the commitment are at least as important in understanding questions of when, if, and how, the U.S. should get into wars.

A large part of the problemvwhen discussing issues like this is that we utilize aristotalian language constructs that are dualistic and a major sign of this would be the use of the word «is,» when to be linguistically scientifically correct everything should be stated as «it appears so to me,» or some variation of this as it takes into account the many errors possible in how people perceive everything.

There are some errors in your doctrine above, especially when painting mainstream LDS doctrine «with the same brush» as the polygamist groups.

In The Literal Meaning of Genesis, he writes, «It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.»

I like your teaching very much and love it when you point out Christ and His love for me but will continue to ignore you as long as you point out the faults and errors of others.

When speaking this way about Scripture, most theologians are about to say that as a result of the Bible being a human book, it should not surprise us to discover that the Bible has errors.

He can teach without error on behalf of all the Bishops in an extra-ordinary way when he solemnly defines certain teachings as infallible.

Dalin quotes Newsweek columnist Kenneth L Woodward as stating that Cornwell's book is «a classic example of what happens when an ill - equipped journalist assumes the air of sober scholarship... Errors of fact and ignorance of context appear on every page».

We find direction in the present as much by studying our past errors as by finding inspiration in those occasions when our ancestors in the faith used their freedom wisely.

As I hate to assume malice when ignorance is enough of an explanation, I give you a chance: just point me to any logical error in any of the major religions.

I'm guessing they're just as subject to error as anyone else's, especially when ego and judgmentalism get in the way.

But when I bring any of them up to one of the fundies I work with, they always sluff it off as either allegory or a scribe's error.

I did not realize that as a practicing Roman Catholic I was in error by supposing that our Lord was wrong when he taught us that harboring lustful thoughts and intentions (now celebrated in popular culture) is a sin.

One thing is clear, the President had learned something from his Philadelphia speech on race last spring, when he made the error, as some so infelicitously out it, of throwing his own grandmother «under the bus.»

The Reformers spoke in biblicist terms when trying to rid Christendom of what they identified as Catholic errors, but biblicism became a less functional standard once Protestants began to disagree among themselves about the meaning of the Bible.

Why then, do you feel that you can safely pick and choose what is the word of god as it is currently literally stated, and how do you determine when something literally stated is a translation error, or taken out of context?

Yet as in the case of Biblicism it is hardly necessary to await the outcome of many inquiries before concluding that substantial error involving many further confusions is present when the proposition that Jesus Christ is God is converted into the proposition that God is Jesus Christ.

These errors are like those made when a nation is defined either institutionally as state, or as pure community by reference only to national «spirit» or a «way of life.»

Then when Barth himself changed his mind — as he so often and so publicly did, as if it were merely a matter of an excusable error after he had formerly fired so all - inclusive a barrage in support of his now - discarded view — it is small wonder that many people became exasperated and, though they might themselves be deeply influenced by him, preferred not to admit it.

As Roger Shinn puts it, referring to the long history of eugenics, «We may claim that we can rise above those past errors, but that is exactly the time when we had better distrust ourselves.»

Due to a translational error he was percieved as being a carpenter, when he actually advertised himself as being a man who liked to work other mens wood.

James is quite in error when he represents Abraham as being justified by works.

Whatever the provocation, it becomes a tragedy when the very institutions designed to rectify the errors of the mental hospital system move into the kind of business - as - usual attitude originally thought to be the worst aspect of mental hospitals.

It also said that the church as a whole is preserved from error by the Holy Spirit when there is universal agreement within it on its fundamental beliefs.

Although I think Jeremy Waldron is a bit over the top when he describes my review as «actively misleading» for stating, incorrectly, that there were no interrogations at Abu Ghraib, he is both correct and right to point out that there were such interrogations; insofar as his letter illustrates that factual errors undercut a criticism of someone else's factual errors, I take his point.

In other words, when the world rejects a bloodthirsty god as being unworthy of our worship, they are not following Satan into error and evil, but are instead following Jesus into what He revealed to us about God.

To write off various portions of Scripture as error is to miss out on some of what God wants to teach us about Himself, when viewed through the lens of Jesus Christ and Him crucified.

I'll give you that an educated guess is better than an uneducated one, but when you start with the premise that the bible is fact and any error can be crossed using «educated guesses» as the foundation of your faith you can but hope that the guesses are true, which is why they call it «faith» and not «fact».

He goes so far as to imply that magisterial intervention is «improper» except when there is an error to be condemned or averted.

Newman believed that the power to impose belief de fide is a weapon in the Church's armory to be used negatively, as «a stern painful necessity,» when an error has arisen or an «impending danger is to be averted.»

When, in the second century, something recognizable as Church History begins to emerge, we find the Roman Church already exercising a negative charism of the exclusion of error.

Trial and error is key when changing the way you eat, as you are the only one who can really figure out what's best for you and your body.

As a newbie to GFDF baking (when paleo and gluten free blogs were scarce), I had a LOT of trial and error to figure things out.

I take my «job» here pretty seriously so if a recipe isn't working I'll problem solve it with the person, or go as far as to remake it to see if I made an error when writing the recipe up.

As others have pointed out, there is an error in the recipe for the oven temp, it should be 375F, so please make that correction when you make this dish.

I would go further and sell Ox as well, he is too error - prone, and does not put enough thought into what he is going to do when he gets into certain spaces.

Also Mertisacker had a few but not as many error prone moments when he was out of position and lured to try and win a ball he can't.

Even when Debuchy is back, i might be tempted to leave Monreal in the middle cos he doesn't make as much errors and rash challenges as chambers

Maybe when a player is not in his position to stop something they don't count that as an error.

Koscielny had similar issues in that his decision making was borderline insane at times but always had exceptional moments that few defenders are capable of... But his errors cost us games, and it was those errors which usually hung around when evaluating him as a player.

1 new offensive coach to make us incisive when attacking 1 new defensive coach to stop the ridiculous defensive errors 1 new goalkeeper who is not as error prone 3 new defenders who can actually defend 1 defensive midfield who can track attacking midfield ad plug holes in the back 1 attacking midfield who is consistant 1 wide attacking player who has the ability to beat a player with skill Also can we please have: 1 new CEO who can do decent commercial deals 1 new owner who cares about the club and what us to challenge in the league

The same Arsene Wenger rhetoric when all is done and dusted and yet, we should look back at games like yesterday's and say,» that was a game that cost us dearly» because great teams, players and managers don't make the same errors as much as we do!!

And then maybe a supporting player for Le Coq because to buy a «world class» dm would be a huge betrayal to Coquelin, who came in as a Saviour when we were drowning in defensive errors.

His defense and speed aren't going to be carrying tools, so he's a bat first left fielder - probably why others are a bit slower on him than us since his overall upside doesn't leave as much room for error, but when you can hit you can play and he can hit.