It's now well - established that large - scale U.S. production of biofuels such
as ethanol from corn has accomplished little or nothing (or even negative) in its stated goals of reducing oil dependence and cutting emissions of greenhouse gases, and has functioned instead as a full - employment program for agribusiness (and a political production racket for Iowa and other corn - growing states).
«It takes 77 million years to make fossil fuels and 45 minutes to use as a coffee cup,» says Cereplast's Scheer, noting that his industry can use the residue of government - mandated production of biofuels, such
as ethanol from corn.
Biofuels from waste avoid the carbon and energy debts incurred by more common examples such
as ethanol from corn or diesel from soy.
Not exact matches
«The study says it will be very hard to make a biofuel that has a better greenhouse gas impact than gasoline using
corn residue,» which puts it in the same boat
as corn - based
ethanol, said David Tilman, a professor at the University of Minnesota who has done research on biofuels» emissions
from the farm to the tailpipe.
Ethanol, an alcohol that can be made
from corn, is now widely used
as a gasoline additive due to its oxygen content and octane rating, or antiknock index.
Commercial - scale efforts have existed for over a hundred years that convert
corn, sugar cane and other plant - based substances into a wide array of products, ranging
from fuel such
as corn - based
ethanol to ingredients in many consumer goods, such
as soap and detergents.
The team achieved better hydrogen yields using methanol and
ethanol as starting materials but because glucose can be derived
from plant waste such
as wood pulp, straw and leftovers
from corn production, the scientists will continue to work on their approach.
Part of the $ 150 billion, 10 - year expenditure — the centerpiece of his energy plan — is to develop these resources
as well
as shift
ethanol production
from corn to cellulose - based sources that do not affect the food supply.
Obama has, however, also been a supporter of
ethanol made primarily
from corn — a prominent industry in his home state of Illinois — and recently told farmers he supports federal mandates to make nine billion gallons (34 billion liters) of
ethanol to use
as fuel this year.
«
Ethanol made from miscanthus would need a much smaller carbon price to make it desirable to produce and for consumers to purchase as compared to ethanol from switchgrass and corn
Ethanol made
from miscanthus would need a much smaller carbon price to make it desirable to produce and for consumers to purchase
as compared to
ethanol from switchgrass and corn
ethanol from switchgrass and
corn stover.
As someone that has spent a fair amount of time looking at the GHG impacts of
ethanol from a LCA perspective, I think everyone is in agreement that
corn is the least beneficial, while sugarcane and cellulosic are the most promisisng.
Meats
from feedlots can be given such things
as corn,
corn by - products (some is derived
from high fructose
corn syrup production and
ethanol), barley, milo, wheat, and other grains and roughage that often consists of
corn stalks, alfalfa, cottonseed meal, and premixes of chemical preservatives, antibiotics, and fermentation products.
Ethanol is derived primarily
from corn but can be made
from virtually any starch feed stock such
as sugarcane, wheat or barley.
And there are virtually no CO2 emissions
from the savings, but increasingly more
from the extra exploration and drilling for hard to get oil,
as well
as for cooking
corn with oil, gas, and coal to get
corn ethanol.
At the moment, most of this comes
from ethanol produced by
corn, and in the future plans are to power vehicles
from forests, oil crops such
as oil palm and soya for biodiesel, and other biomass.
Trees may not take
as much CO2 out of the air
as corn plants do but they only have to take out less than half
as much, since three to four times
as much CO2 is in the whole
corn plant
as there is in the
ethanol produced
from it.
The use of
ethanol produced
from corn in the U.S. and sugar cane in Brazil has given birth to the commercialization of an alternative fuel that is coming to show substantial promise, particularly
as new feedstocks are developed.
But that turned out to be not just environmentally destructive but was also arguably responsible for the spike in food prices that soon followed,
as farmers turned away
from cultivating
corn for human consumption to cultivating it for
ethanol production.
Let's not forget
ethanol is made
from food crops such
as corn and right now there's a drought in much of the Midwest, which is causing
corn and other crop prices to rise.
In the next two to five years, the energy - efficient production of
ethanol from cellulosic biomass such
as wheat and rice straw, hemp, flax, and
corn stalks will become commercially viable.
People who champion
corn - based
ethanol as a «bridge» to a cellulosic future can take little comfort
from the Congressman
from Minnesota.
And finally on the renewable fuels side, it includes a $ 20 million program to build a cellulosic
ethanol facility to create the first pilot - plant (we hope) that will produce
ethanol from woody biomass
as opposed to
corn, and thereby drastically raising the energy balance of the
ethanol.
Although
corn ethanol as modeled here emits marginally less GHGs than does gasoline, the combined climate and air quality impacts are greater than those
from gasoline vehicles.
The Wall Street Journal has reported the results of two independent studies that suggest the widespread use of
ethanol from corn could result in nearly twice the greenhouse gas emissions
as the gasoline it would replace because of expected land - use changes, researchers concluded Thursday. The study challenges the rush to biofuels
as a response to global warming.
Ethanol made from a prairie grass shows promise as a viable fuel that could be much more environmentally friendly and energy - efficient than corn ethanol, a new stud
Ethanol made
from a prairie grass shows promise
as a viable fuel that could be much more environmentally friendly and energy - efficient than
corn ethanol, a new stud
ethanol, a new study says.
When really pressed on why the USDA and the Obama administration continue to support
corn based
ethanol, they point to using it
as helping support the fledgling cellulosic
ethanol industry, which seems to always be just 5 years away
from commercial viability.
The one caveat in all this is that
ethanol is partly produced
from corn waste and by - products that is not normally used
as food http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2013/08/25/business/
ethanol-plant-using-
corn-waste-moves-forward
There are more emissions
from the total
Corn Ethanol production sequence and use
as an alternative and additive to fossil fuels than if ordinary fossil originated fuels were just used to do the job.
PS Sugar cane
ethanol yields per acre are around twice
as high
as those
from corn (but sugar cane does not grow in most of the US).
As our host states above, ethanol from starch (corn or wheat, as used in the EU) was supposed to be a pump primer for cellulosic ethanol, but has become an end in itself as an agricultural subsid
As our host states above,
ethanol from starch (
corn or wheat,
as used in the EU) was supposed to be a pump primer for cellulosic ethanol, but has become an end in itself as an agricultural subsid
as used in the EU) was supposed to be a pump primer for cellulosic
ethanol, but has become an end in itself
as an agricultural subsid
as an agricultural subsidy.
Bioethenol — Bioethenol is
ethanol derived
from the fermentation of plant matter (such
as corn, switchgrass, grains or sugarcane).
The minute advantage of mixing
ethanol with gasoline is hard to justify when it is distilled
from a food crop such
as corn.
By deriving it
from inedible plant matter such
as switchgrass, wood chips, and wheat straw, the hope is that cellulosic
ethanol could supplement our transportation fuels in a way that is more efficient and has fewer harmful impacts on the environment and food prices than
corn - based
ethanol.
For example, starch
from corn grown in the midwest has traditionally been the source of some of the
ethanol used
as a fuel additive in the U.S.. Another option for the conversion of cellulosic biomass, such
as hemp stalks, to
ethanol is their hydrolysis to sugar, followed by fermentation and removal of the produced
ethanol by distillation.
At issue is whether to suspend a five - year - old federal mandate requiring more
ethanol in gasoline each year, a policy that has diverted almost half of the domestic
corn supply
from animal feedlots to
ethanol refineries, driven up
corn prices and plantings and created a desperate competition for
corn as drought grips the nation's farm belt.
Rainforest Rescue's recent and still active U.S. agrofuel alert with Ecological Internet has already led to partial success,
as the decision on whether to increase the
corn ethanol blend
from 10 % to 15 % has been delayed for a year.
,:: Final Word on
Ethanol's Efficiency
as Vehicle Fuel,:: Not All
Ethanol is Created Equal,::
Corn Demand
from Ethanol Distilleries Vastly Understated,:: They Can Have their Cellulose and Digest it Too
«Our government pays to subsidize
corn - based
ethanol even
as it collects tariffs that prevent consumers
from benefiting
from other kinds of
ethanol, such
as sugarcane - based
ethanol from Brazil,» he said.
There are a number of new approaches to producing
corn - based
ethanol, using more renewable energy in the production of
ethanol (such
as methane
from waste products or wind energy).
(Note that the study did not look at first generation biofuels made
from tropical crops like sugarcane or sweet sorghum which reduce emissions far more than
corn ethanol; for sugarcane
ethanol, the reduction is
as large
as that of cellulosic biofuels, earlier post.)
They are perhaps not sufficently negative regarding
ethanol -
from -
corn or biodiesel -
from - rapeseed, but they certainly are (properly) negative regarding the feasibility of using algae
as part of a solution anytime soon.
According to the Daily Climate, the California regulators are prepared to go
as far
as to declare that biofuels can not help the state fight climate change — could this be the beginning of the end for
ethanol?The Corn Ethanol Question The ethanol industry is obviously worried about the move, and is opposing it — they say cutting off investments in the technology now would prevent them from reaching their fuel efficiency
ethanol?The
Corn Ethanol Question The ethanol industry is obviously worried about the move, and is opposing it — they say cutting off investments in the technology now would prevent them from reaching their fuel efficiency
Ethanol Question The
ethanol industry is obviously worried about the move, and is opposing it — they say cutting off investments in the technology now would prevent them from reaching their fuel efficiency
ethanol industry is obviously worried about the move, and is opposing it — they say cutting off investments in the technology now would prevent them
from reaching their fuel efficiency goals.
The EPA announced yesterday that it would open a 30 day commenting period
as it weighs requests
from multiple state governors to use provisions in the Clean Air Act to temporarily suspend the
corn ethanol mandate under the Renewable Fuel Standard:
Almost all U.S.
ethanol comes
from corn and,
as a fuel,
corn just isn't
as «amaizing»
as they say.
The study comes
as corn -
ethanol faces increasing criticism
from environmentalists who say the increased
corn production is worsening air and water pollution, depleting water supplies, driving record high food prices, and contributing to deforestation of the Amazon rainforest.