Sentences with phrase «as evidence in support of her claim»

A report on charter schools in the San Francisco Bay area is widely cited as evidence in support of this claim (Woodworth et al., 2008).

Rouleau J.A. held that a medical opinion «simply would serve as evidence in support of her claim, not as the disclosure of necessary facts to ascertain whether she had a claim against Dr. Anderson.

Not exact matches

In light of the Israeli claims and the impending May 12 deadline, Congressional committees should press adviser Bolton and Secretary Pompeo on the specific sections of the Iran deal that evidence supports are being violated by Iran and to seek assurances on U.S. actions to continue diplomatically to address these as provided in the JCPOA itselIn light of the Israeli claims and the impending May 12 deadline, Congressional committees should press adviser Bolton and Secretary Pompeo on the specific sections of the Iran deal that evidence supports are being violated by Iran and to seek assurances on U.S. actions to continue diplomatically to address these as provided in the JCPOA itselin the JCPOA itself.

In order to calculate the probability of a specific miracle claim with mathematical integrity, other factors such as the evidence supporting the claimed event must also be taken into account.

Offering specious arguments such as in the article to support that... claiming there's evidence of that when there isn't... that offends.

«Founded by atheism, claimed by atheism, supported by atheism, and exclusively in the interests of atheism, suppressing without mercy every jot of evidence for the divine existence, and so making a positive rational faith in God wholly impossible, the doctrine of evolution may well be set down as not only a foe to theism, but a foe of the most thoroughgoing sort.»

You can say there is evidence to support biblical claims, such as a building in ruins that proves some of the historical writings.

Matt, in the article Dr. Amy says «THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesEVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&rCLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&rclaims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species».

After an exhaustive investigation of the toxic gas hypothesis lasting three and a half years, methodically examining every aspect of the claim both by reviewing existing research, as well as by commissioning new research, the Expert Group has concluded that there is no evidence to support the claim that fire retardants in PVC cot mattresses cause SIDS.

The biggest problem with the equating of DHA to DHASCO and ARA to ARASCO is that the two are not the same and there is little evidence to support the claims that DHA / ARA found in formula provides the same benefits as that found in breast milk.

In addition, Freedom from Torture regularly supports torture survivors whose legal representation has previously been poor and as a result, vital medical evidence of torture has not been submitted as part of their asylum claim or appeal.

Massey and Malliotakis come from different wings of the Republican Party, with Massey a moderate billing himself as a «non-political» technocrat open to «ideas from across the political spectrum,» in the Michael Bloomberg mold; while Malliotakis — as evidenced by her support from the Conservative Party — is further to the right, though she has also claimed to not easily fit into any ideological orthodoxy.

The group stated that, they had water tight evidence to support their claim of a meeting held last week in Kumasi at the instance of Akufo - Addo, where Nana Akufo - Addo is said to have deployed Kofi Jumah, Amoako Tufuor and others to form mushroom groups with what the group described as «wicked purposes» in springing forth «outright lies» and «concoction of untruths» that will translate into setting the stage to blame innocent people in the Kufuor faction against the outcome of the 2016 elections.

As evidence grows in support of Wilkin's accelerator hypothesis, he reiterates that he is not claiming type 1 and type 2 diabetes are identical, or that weight gain alone «causes» type 1.

As a result of this study, HD 284149 ABb therefore becomes the latest addition to the (short) list of brown dwarfs on wide circumbinary orbits, providing new evidence to support recent claims that object in such configuration occur with a similar frequency to wide companions to single stars.

A meta - analysis of literature related to the use of velvet antler products as an alternative to drugs provides credible evidence to support the claim that compounds in velvet antler may be significantly more effective than many conventional prescription and over-the-counter drugs for relief of the symptoms of osteoarthritis.

Although there are numerous claimed benefits of using probiotic supplements, such as maintaining gastrointestinal health, in part by lowering risk of and severity of constipation or diarrhea, and improving immune health, including lower risk of and severity of acute upper respiratory tract infections, i.e., the common cold, such claims are not all supported by sufficient clinical evidence.

While Stephanie did mention her own instructional strategies as a part of her evidence for lesson effectiveness, the function of these strategies served to support her claims that she was attending to the learning needs of this particular subgroup of students, the English learners in her class.

All hoaxes, as Diane Ravitch would put it, all of which he is advancing in this Op - Ed without any research evidence whatsoever in support, but because he «believes» in the claims he advances.

In a 2009 discussion for National Public Radio, evidence is shown to support the claim that employers indeed use credit ratings to determine the trustworthiness of a candidate, as well as to judge the character of a person they consider qualified to work for them.

If I can make as controversial a claim as is supported by the evidence, even the American Express Delta Platinum credit card, with its $ 195 annual fee and companion ticket awarded on each account anniversary, only makes sense (compared to redeeming Arrival + miles) if you can consistently redeem the companion ticket for flights costing more than $ 672 — the value of the Arrival + miles you could manufacture with the same $ 195 in disposable income — or if you can use the Medallion Qualifying Miles earned with the card to achieve Platinum or Diamond Medallion status.

And just as some masterpieces (think of Shakespeare's plays «really» written by Bacon) are dogged by fancies that they were done by someone else, so it has turned out to be with Goya and the Black Paintings: a Spanish furniture historian, Juan José Junquera, recently created a brief flurry of headlines in Europe and America by claiming - on no pictorial evidence at all - that the Black Paintings were «really» done by Goya's son Javier, a ne'er - do - much who may have been a painter - certainly his father called him that, if only in support of his application for a pension - but by whom no attributable paintings exist.

Fascinating that he suggest a state change before and after climategate — as the result of climategate — with providing neither evidence of a change in state or evidence supporting his claim of attribution.

His position: • No evidence of increasing lake clarity as a result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption on the correlation of wind and productivity - the highest production is on the end of the lake with the lowest winds • A strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link climate change to productivity changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year • Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining productivity.

Alas, I believe the preponderance of evidence strongly supports the claim that anthropogenic emissions are having an effect on the global climate, and that effect will increase as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

Unless you know the pedigree of the simulations, they should probably be consider «for entertainment purposes only», but not as rigorous scientific evidence in support of any particular subtle claims.

There isn't the slightest shred of evidence to support Fuller's claim humans will use 3000 quads as of 2075, and that idea is contradicted by the very work he published in his book.

As a scientist, he says, he has seen no evidence to support the extravagant claims of the alarmists that CO2 levels are impacting climate, and, in fact, the CO2 levels have historically been much higher, with no evidence of harm, but much evidence of benefit.

Plaintiff, however, may use these prior acts as background evidence in support of a timely claim.

So, it is important for our firm to obtain evidence in support of your claim as soon as possible.

In support of her ADA discrimination and retaliation claims, Diaz argued that the medical evidence taken as a whole, shows that she was disabled when her employment was terminated.

He has turned an arbitration over his termination during the probationary period of his employment in 1999 into a legal battle that apparently continues today, including allegations of bias against members of the BC Labour Relations Board (which were noted as being without merit), a Statement of Claim against the BC Attorney General (and others) which was dismissed as an abuse of process, and the attempted swearing of two informations against a vice chair of the BC LRB (which the court found there was no evidence to support).

As part of our role we obtained expert medical evidence in order to support the value of the claim.

As to the remainder of the Arbitration, following the Second PFA, on 9 August 2016, afterservice by the parties of revised statements of case and evidence in support, the Tribunal ordered that there be a further hearing on all remaining questions of: (i) the liability of the KRG under the claims advanced by the Claimants; and (ii) the liability of the Claimants under the counterclaims advanced by the KRG.

As a result, the plaintiff failed to offer evidence in support of the interference prong of its tortious interference claim sufficient to survive summary judgment.

The writer argues in his letter that (i) the evidence does not support the conclusion that there is systemic racism in the legal professions, (ii) the claim of systemic racism vilifies lawyers and paralegals by labelling them as racist, (iii) the 13 recommendations are a form of unauthorized social engineering, (iv) racism and bullying are just part of life and should be simply be endured and overcome by racialized licensees as others have done before them, (v) the true problem is economic class not race, (vi) white privilege is a ridiculous concept as it relates to white and racialized lawyers and (vii) racialized lawyers who join legal associations based on race or ethnic origin can not complain that they are not treated equally.

[22] As shown by the recent Court of Appeal decision in Deep, Steinecke is still good law, as the Court found that Deep could not rely on documents inadmissible under civil proceedings due to s. RHPA 36 (3), and found that, «[w] ithout this evidence the appellant has no way of proving the necessary facts to support his claim.&raquAs shown by the recent Court of Appeal decision in Deep, Steinecke is still good law, as the Court found that Deep could not rely on documents inadmissible under civil proceedings due to s. RHPA 36 (3), and found that, «[w] ithout this evidence the appellant has no way of proving the necessary facts to support his claim.&raquas the Court found that Deep could not rely on documents inadmissible under civil proceedings due to s. RHPA 36 (3), and found that, «[w] ithout this evidence the appellant has no way of proving the necessary facts to support his claim.»

For another, it bears noting that neither Tinker or Michael nor Javier (which, admittedly, did not involve a fully - fledged constitutional challenge) suggest that there is serious, or «voluminous» (as Justice Doyon suggests) evidence in support of the Crown's claim that the surcharge can be justified under s. 1 of the Charter.

Written warning In addition to clarifying the court's approach to evidence filed in support of claims to litigation privilege, the decision serves as a warning to companies which adopt written policies concerning the investigation and reporting of major incidents arising in the course of their businesIn addition to clarifying the court's approach to evidence filed in support of claims to litigation privilege, the decision serves as a warning to companies which adopt written policies concerning the investigation and reporting of major incidents arising in the course of their businesin support of claims to litigation privilege, the decision serves as a warning to companies which adopt written policies concerning the investigation and reporting of major incidents arising in the course of their businesin the course of their business.

In Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada noted that a refusal to provide a former employee with a letter of reference following the termination of his or her employment would constitute bad faith or unfair dealings in the manner of dismissal — and therefore could be used as evidence in support of a damages claiIn Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada noted that a refusal to provide a former employee with a letter of reference following the termination of his or her employment would constitute bad faith or unfair dealings in the manner of dismissal — and therefore could be used as evidence in support of a damages claiin the manner of dismissal — and therefore could be used as evidence in support of a damages claiin support of a damages claim.

Moscow has repeatedly denied meddling in foreign elections and Ukraine's internal affairs as well as the involvement in the poisoning of former spy Sergei Skripal in the UK, saying London lacks evidence to support its claims.

In addition to grabbing the attention of potential employers, the resume sample also provides evidence to support that claim, with a description of various teaching methods and an entry about linking students to activities in the community, such as «recommending publications, local events, and significant historical sites.&raquIn addition to grabbing the attention of potential employers, the resume sample also provides evidence to support that claim, with a description of various teaching methods and an entry about linking students to activities in the community, such as «recommending publications, local events, and significant historical sites.&raquin the community, such as «recommending publications, local events, and significant historical sites.»

Further, in describing flaws in the data the EEOC's expert Kevin Murphy relied upon to support the disparate impact claim, the Judge labeled these reports as 1) «laughable»; 2) «based on unreliable data»; 3) «rife with analytical error»; 4) containing «a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies,» and a «mind - boggling number of errors»; 5) «completely unreliable»; 6) «so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded»; 7) «distorted»; 8) «both over and under inclusive»; 9) «cherry - picked»; 10) «worthless»; and 11) «an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.»

[9] There is evidence to support the claim that stress causes brain changes, such as reductions in hippocampal volume.9 Research has also indicated that recurrent episodes of MDD might cause reductions in hippocampal volume.

Turning to the specifics of this case, we think there are observations of the primary judge in his reasons which suggest that his Honour approached the material before the Registrar on the basis that it should be evaluated as if it was evidence furnished in support of the claim.

You start off by quoting as evidence to support your argument, claims made on the cover of Popenoe's book, written by a copy editor at a publishing company, in order to increase book sales.

As to paragraph 8 of Form 4 it was held by French J (as President of the Tribunal) in Waanyi Peoples» Native Title Application (1994) 129 ALR 100) in relation to Form 1 under the old Native Title Act provisions relating to a claim for native title determination, that an «outline of the type of evidence» which the applicant will produce to the Tribunal to support its claim did not require a description of the content of such evidence but rather «a listing of its categories»As to paragraph 8 of Form 4 it was held by French J (as President of the Tribunal) in Waanyi Peoples» Native Title Application (1994) 129 ALR 100) in relation to Form 1 under the old Native Title Act provisions relating to a claim for native title determination, that an «outline of the type of evidence» which the applicant will produce to the Tribunal to support its claim did not require a description of the content of such evidence but rather «a listing of its categories»as President of the Tribunal) in Waanyi Peoples» Native Title Application (1994) 129 ALR 100) in relation to Form 1 under the old Native Title Act provisions relating to a claim for native title determination, that an «outline of the type of evidence» which the applicant will produce to the Tribunal to support its claim did not require a description of the content of such evidence but rather «a listing of its categories».

The court also questioned the evidence submitted by the Taxpayer in support of his claims, as the court found that the evidence appeared to be mere estimations of the time spent working on the rental properties, which is not sufficient to support a claim of being a real estate professional under the Code.

Peltonen v. Halstead Property Corp. (10 Misc.3 d 130A)-- small claims judgment in favor of broker dismissing seller's action against broker affirmed; evidence supports a finding that broker satisfactorily performed its contractual obligations and that seller suffered no damages as a result of broker's «defective» services; seller's condominium apartment was sold within one month of the parties» listing agreement and at a purchase price exceeding the asking price in a co-brokered transaction.