But acrimony isn't limited to the founding team, and when things go bad with an investor, it can get ugly pretty quickly
as evidenced in the case of ArsDigital.
To date, it has NEVER been allowed to be used
as evidence in any case, civil or criminal... why is that?
Federal investigators said they have more than 2 million pages of documents, as well as phones, phone recordings and computers
as evidence in the case.
On Jan. 7, 2016 after Mike McMahon was sworn in as DA, Judge McMahon handled the decision whether to allow video
as evidence in the case against Ramsey Orta case (the man who filmed the Eric Garner police chokehold death).
The document — which the jury and the public were never allowed to see — will not be used
as evidence in the case.
Mittenthal said emails «pertinent to investigations or that could be used
as evidence in a case or sought in a discovery process» were retained for longer.
A sample of the Tweets used
as evidence in the case can be found here, in an article posted to the FTC's blog.»
In addition, any medical records or reports to might want to present
as evidence in your case are far more likely to be available and accessible after six months, rather than five years.
This means it doesn't have to be a sworn statement and it can't be used
as evidence in the case.
Electronic discovery (also known as e-discovery, e discovery, or eDiscovery) is a procedure by which parties involved in a legal case preserve, collect, review, and exchange information in electronic formats for the purpose of using
it as evidence in the case.
According to Engadget, the complaint stems from emails received
as evidence in a case Apple fought with a patent troll.
As of October 1, parties seeking a divorce in Maryland will be able to use a court - issued domestic violence order
as evidence in their cases.
Not exact matches
There's the third, more realistic action, which is you have to get some sort of production order of the data at Uber
as evidence in a court
case.
Evidence of lack of business integrity (such
as indictments, pleas of guilt
in legal
cases, convictions for violations of legal behavior, adverse civil judgements, or out - of - court settlements).
In almost every
case, however, Buffett's bromides against private equity get raised
as supporting
evidence.
As someone super interested
in the future, this actually does seem like something he might do, but there is zero
evidence of this being the
case.
In this case, the black - and - white evidence against the cartel was revealed in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raqu
In this
case, the black - and - white
evidence against the cartel was revealed
in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raqu
in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such
as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!»
So there is a clear business
case to be made for it; the
evidence is mounting, and
in addition to that, the President speaks quite often about our responsibilities
as citizens of our country.
«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are
in many
cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic
as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»
In any case, based on this subset of data, there is evidence that, as the influence of female investors in partnerships expands, there is likely to be a benefit for female founder
In any
case, based on this subset of data, there is
evidence that,
as the influence of female investors
in partnerships expands, there is likely to be a benefit for female founder
in partnerships expands, there is likely to be a benefit for female founders.
as to Shares deliverable on the exercise of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, or
in settlement of Performance Units or Restricted Stock Units, until the delivery (
as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of Walmart of a duly authorized transfer agent of Walmart) of such Shares, give the Recipient the right to vote, or receive dividends on, or exercise any other rights
as a stockholder with respect to such Shares, notwithstanding the exercise (
in the
case of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights) of the related Plan Award;
By midday Tuesday Mr. Snowden himself,
in a Twitter message from his exile
in Moscow, declared that «circumstantial
evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility» for publication, which he interpreted
as a warning shot to the American government
in case it was thinking of imposing sanctions against Russia
in the cybertheft of documents from the Democratic National Committee.
As cases in federal court and several state courts delve into whether there is
evidence that glyphosate causes cancer, a scientist with a consumer...
In the case of the dozen or more allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump himself, as in the case of ousted White House staff secretary Rob Porter, the weight of the available evidence comes down conclusively on the side of the accuser
In the
case of the dozen or more allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump himself,
as in the case of ousted White House staff secretary Rob Porter, the weight of the available evidence comes down conclusively on the side of the accuser
in the
case of ousted White House staff secretary Rob Porter, the weight of the available
evidence comes down conclusively on the side of the accusers.
At a hearing last week
in Asheville, North Carolina, U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn said he would consider dismissing the lawsuit, saying the DoJ may not have the
evidence to try this
as a fraud
case.
In any case, Giuliani's admission is more evidence that as Robert Mueller's team closes in on the Oval Office, Trump has decided to double down on litigating the president's scandals in the court of public opinio
In any
case, Giuliani's admission is more
evidence that
as Robert Mueller's team closes
in on the Oval Office, Trump has decided to double down on litigating the president's scandals in the court of public opinio
in on the Oval Office, Trump has decided to double down on litigating the president's scandals
in the court of public opinio
in the court of public opinion.
In this case, as in all others, evidence matters, and citizens should demand politicians base their decisions on i
In this
case,
as in all others, evidence matters, and citizens should demand politicians base their decisions on i
in all others,
evidence matters, and citizens should demand politicians base their decisions on it.
In either
case, there's no
evidence to support wasting one's only life
as if one or more of the god fables is true, much less running a nation or world
as if it were.
In many
cases we atheists are atheists because the
evidence as presented to us does not make a strong
case for a given religion.
I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is
evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just
as in a court
case, some jurors are convinced with very little
evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much
evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever
evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»
As evidence of this, he observed, «I can't think of any
case in which a doctor has been accused of taking money for doing something a doctor would not have done anyway.»
Often,
as in the
case of the Christian god, those characteristics, such
as «personal, loving» and «merciful» are reasonably falsifiable when considering the available
evidence,
as well
as inconsistent and self - contradictory.
Mr Page said: «
As a highly experienced magistrate, I have made judgments on thousands of
cases and
in each
case, have come to my decision based on the
evidence, and the
evidence alone, placed before me and my colleagues.
nearly imposiible unless it happened the way that is indicated... but
in this
case, there is no absolute
evidence,
as we have with the Big Bang, so the correct term is likely.
In the
case of creationism, for example, scientific
evidence now exists which contradicts directly with the creation myth (unless one thinks of the creation story
as being an allegory or something like that).
In every
case you pretty much have to want to believe you're looking at «
evidence» to believe what they present is
evidence,
as none of it is conclusive and some of it seems downright silly.
Even your own moldy «holy book» has NEVER, EVER been introduced
as evidence of any kind
in ANY court
case.
Instead, they mostly wish the cross away, dismissing (
in Scaperlanda's
case) mountains of
evidence and the normal application of the laws of economics so long
as they can find a single economist who hasn't made up his mind.
This might be the
case, and certainly the
evidence is that Jesus and his disciples did not,
in fact, fast
in the prescribed manner,
as we saw earlier
in this chapter.
I do nt usually argue with fellow believers, but
in this
case I would point out that there is no scriptural
evidence that Adam changed physically
as a result of the fall (by adding genitalia)
Dodd's whole thesis with regard to a kerygmatic chronology fails for lack of the confirming
evidence required to establish a position which would reverse the course of scholarship, and thus must move against the stream of current views
as to the probabilities
in the
case.
As to whether the apostle in this particular case was Bartholomew as Pantaneus understood it or Thomas as most Indian Christians would insist, the evidence is too slight for a firm conclusio
As to whether the apostle
in this particular
case was Bartholomew
as Pantaneus understood it or Thomas as most Indian Christians would insist, the evidence is too slight for a firm conclusio
as Pantaneus understood it or Thomas
as most Indian Christians would insist, the evidence is too slight for a firm conclusio
as most Indian Christians would insist, the
evidence is too slight for a firm conclusion.
However, my example of homicide was that there are intangible, impalpable things
as well
as hard physical
evidence in a homicide
case.
Unless, of course, there was a major disaster that rapidly buried all sorts of plant and animal life under extreme pressure,
in which
case science would allow for fossil fuels to develop
in such a circu.mstance (
as evidenced in the Mt. St Helens eruption)... but said disaster never occured
in the bible, did it?
Seeing such divergence
as evidence against Christianity is based upon the Protestant - Islamic view of scripture (and
in any
case the gap is gradually closing).
The first is that Christian denominations that have taken this form of liberalism most to heart are also those that seem to be experiencing a serious crisis of confidence,
as evidenced by declining membership, intra-denominational splits over issues like homosexuality, and ¯
in some
cases ¯ increasing discomfort with core Christian beliefs about Jesus Christ and the Trinity.
Facts, or
evidence, seem incontrovertible only
in the light, or dark
as the
case may be, of human judgment, which is the only source of error on this planet.
That church was caught up
in the biblical ambiguity,
as chapter 10 has
evidenced.19 But,
as is the
case with Jesus, it is easy to see where the weight falls.
«First, if
cases can be found
in which there has been widespread human cooperation and yet there has been no success, these
cases would count
as evidence against the existence of such a conditional guarantee.
Because, it is claimed, evaluation presupposes valuation
as a condition of its possibility, any merely «disinterested» or «value - free» understanding of human reflection is of necessity excluded.20 Any consideration of the
evidence of experience could only
in the nature of the
case ever illustrate, but logically could not falsify what must always necessarily be the
case, even if such a consideration could well force a limited reconstrual of the hermeneutical analysis always itself presupposed
in the strictly conceptual presuppositional analysis which uncovers the necessity of such elemental valuing.21