But remember, the preponderance of the evidence standard is relatively low and you can present other evidence, such
as eyewitness testimony and photographs of the accident scene.
For a fresh vantage point on the whole «real» Jesus issue, I recommend the book, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels
As Eyewitness Testimony, by Richard Bauckham.
Not exact matches
Besides, much
eyewitness evidence is highly unreliable,
as demonstrated by the hundreds of death row inmates who, in recent decades, they're convicted by
eyewitness testimony and later exonerated by DNA analysis.
As for «
eyewitness testimony» that's suspect.
So, no,
as a general rule the
testimony on many
eyewitnesses, even verifiable ones, isn't always reliable, is it?
Everything indicates that Paul himself interpreted the lightning - struck encounter with the resurrected Lord on the way to Damascus
as an appearance which links his experience to the chain of
eyewitness testimonies of the life of Jesus and of the resurrection (Acts 22:14, 15; 26:15 - 20).
It's possible that the DNA could be wrong, or that the reenactment models could be off, but in the absence of any actual
eyewitness (and even that
testimony is not
as reliable
as once assumed)
testimony to an event it is the best we have to go on, right?
Bater pertinently comments, «If there was that much ambiguity about the resurrection of Jesus for the
eyewitnesses, on whose
testimony all the succeeding ages must depend, do not the efforts twenty centuries later to establish it
as demonstrable and unambiguous take on a certain comical effect?»
We take I Corinthians 15 to be our most reliable
testimony to the resurrection appearances,
as being the only
eyewitness report we have.
they were written by
eyewitnesses ----
As you've been told before,
eyewitness testimony is often not dependable and often inaccurate.
The second half of the lecture goes on to make the case for the authentic historicity — the truth — of the Gospels
as reports by or of
eyewitness testimony to the ministry of Jesus.
Yet, Protestant / evangelical Christians will believe
as absolute fact, that a first century dead man walked out of his tomb after three days of decomposing, ate a broiled fish lunch with his friends, and then levitated into outer space based on the
testimony of... one..., possible,
eyewitness»
testimony!
Not the first person
as would be expected of
eyewitness testimony.
These days, wells travels about 26 weeks a year
as the unofficial head of a loosely affiliated cadre of academics, lawyers, and police officers proselytizing new procedures for judging
eyewitness testimony.
Research by psychologists at Florida Atlantic University gives new meaning to the notion of «guilt by association» and aims to test how memory in humans
as well
as police use of mugshots and subtle innuendo can contaminate
eyewitness testimonies.
Following a comprehensive review of police reports, logbooks,
eyewitness testimony and other vital evidence, our California truck accident lawyer may seek compensation for damages such
as:
In some cases, your lawyer may obtain evidence establishing negligence, such
as surveillance footage, maintenance records and reports, toxicology results,
eyewitness testimony, vehicle computer data, internal documents, or expert opinion regarding the standard of care that should have been exercised in a given scenario.
Perry appealed his conviction, claiming that the federal and New Hampshire constitutions prevented the use of
eyewitness testimony when police have manipulated the identification procedures making it more likely that the
eyewitness would select a specific person
as a suspect.
As is the case for the majority of wrongful convictions, faulty
eyewitness testimony was at the root of Porter's case and conviction.
The appellants referred to the
testimony of expert witnesses and an independent
eyewitness who described the accident
as having been caused by Ms. Bradford, the cyclist.