Sentences with phrase «as fake skeptics»

Unfortunately, most of those who call themselves skeptics, espcially those who blather on and on about the end of global warming while swallowing the most ludicrous ideas hook line and sinker, would be better described as fake skeptics.

Tamino has just now shown that RATPAC balloon thermometer data of the lower troposphere does not support a «pause» in warming over the past 18 years as fake skeptics claim RSS data do.

The point is that focusing on temperatures over the past decade (as the fake skeptics constantly do) is pointless to begin with, and that we should be examining longer, statistically significant trends.

Vaughn, instead of an EXTREME Warmist; you are starting to sound as a Fake Skeptic (as inbedded Warmist in the Skeptic's camp) What did they do to you; did they promise you more rip - off money — or are you starting to run with one leg on each side of a barbed wire fence... will get even more painful!!!

Not exact matches

McCarthy, as she always does, went big all night in the host's chair, whether mocking science deniers (and beating up Jennifer Aniston) in a fake ad for gravity skeptics, yelling at Kimmel's sidekick Guillermo Rodriguez for not dressing up in silly costumes with her as had been supposedly decided, or dutifully greeting her three guests in a succession of said costumes.

The apparent great Arctic sea ice refreeze as some «fake skeptics» put it, is bunk.

Dad would come home from a conference reporting that yet another scientist was fuming about being misrepresented as being a fake skeptic, when they were nothing of the sort.

As a reminder, the study purported to link skeptics with belief in odd conspiracy theories, particularly the theory that the Apollo 11 landings were faked (a conclusion highlighted in the title of the press release).

All skeptical arguments are OK, as long as they are TRUE skeptics, not the fake skeptics that exists on a sliding scale such as Myr *.

If this is the best today's climate fake skeptics can do, perhaps, as Patrick Michaels suggests, they are losing the battle.

AGW's present themselves as «the skeptics», but both groups have the same basic fake fisics; AGW's say «we're not disputing that carbon dioxide heats the Earth, we're disputing the amount of warming this is causing».

The U.S. and the Saudis, to be sure, hold prominent positions, and just behind them are the rest of the usual suspects: ExxonMobil lobbyists, the American Enterprise Institute, The International Chamber of Commerce (whom journalists complain is so predictable as to be boring, and therefore useless), the skeptics - cum - denialists, the anonymous scum who distributed counterfeit editions of NGO newsletters (they weren't, actually, very funny) and fake - byline flyers ridiculing the third - world victims of climate change (you have to see them to believe them).

The skeptic world is all made up fantasy and the skeptics living in it even go so far as to describe everything else fake.

As the former Editor of DeSmogBlog, most of the climate deniers and self - proclaimed skeptics I have encountered over the years have been paid by Exxon, the Koch brothers or other such industry interests, making a good living as fake experts for hirAs the former Editor of DeSmogBlog, most of the climate deniers and self - proclaimed skeptics I have encountered over the years have been paid by Exxon, the Koch brothers or other such industry interests, making a good living as fake experts for hiras fake experts for hire.

It is as nonsensical and unscientific as the other kookie phrase from fake - skeptics - «the globe is cooling my friends.»

I haven't read the entire report, so perhaps discussion of these consequences is scattered all over the place (probably in WG II, I'm sure some fake skeptic hero will leak that one too as soon as attention dies down).

One of the reasons I come here is to continue to educate myself, and I find that moderation is exactly as stated — gentle, patient, and sticking to science until the commenter begins to be more obvious, if less genuine, in spouting the party line in the fake skeptic movement.

This linguistic convention is very standard, and is why fake «skeptics» had no difficulty in interpreting the survey exactly as I do until it became rhetorically convenient to suggest another (unwarranted) interpretation.