Sentences with phrase «as familial»

The people at the firm have described the atmosphere as familial, stemming from that shared history.

The defendants say that one of their objections to admissibility of this report is the relation, which is described as a familial one, between counsel and the plaintiff's treating physician.

Melike KARA's work explores a highly unique and personal approach to figuration that's informed by diverse interests ranging from 20th century German figurative traditions and a deep interest in social hierarchies, as well as both her familial history of migration and the realities of straddling two cultures.

Congenital hypomyelination is seen as a familial / inherited disorder in Springer Spaniels, Chow Chows, Weimaraners, and Bernese Mountain Dogs, usually with signs developing around 2 — 8 wk of age.

Samoyed dogs (as well as Italian Greyhounds and Standard Poodles) are affected by an inherited disease of enamel formation known as familial enamel hypoplasia (Amelogensis imperfecta).

While the film might sound depressing, it is actually a very funny comedy that happens to deal with such cold, hard realities as familial difficulties, the physical and mental deterioration of aging, and the morass of realizing that one hasn't lived the life one expected or desired — maybe even realizing one was never certain of what kind of life that might have been in the first place.

A dirge of unfunny scatological material, techno - anxiety and child endangerment masquerading as familial bonding.

Despite fans seeing romantic chemistry between her character and another Final Fantasy XIII party member, Fang, Van Cuylenburg played it off as familial.

Free dating site in oregon) the presence of hypomagnesemia raises the possibility of an underlying genetic disorder, such as familial hypomagnesemia with.

To Detect Colon Cancer, Look in the Mouth Researchers in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Program, found that people who have a hereditary colon cancer syndrome known as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) also have abnormally dense blood vessel growth in the lining of their mouths, so they developed a simple and quick screening test that uses an automated camera - like device to measure the vascular density in the lining of the mouth.

Cancers that affect multiple family members and pass from generation to generation are referred to as familial cancer syndromes.

Researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center have identified mutations in two genes that cause a fatal lung scarring disease known as familial pulmonary fibrosis.

As he ages and makes peace with his athletic past in It Never Rains, Bradley realizes that football exerts a pull as strong as any familial or civic bond.

Tell that to Mother Theresa and all the people that lay in agony without painkillers in her Houses for the Dying, denied so much as a familial visit as they waste away on tiny cots in unsanitary conditions.

(For accentuating the positive, we will set aside the negative aspect of communal connectedness as overbearing and even debilitating as familial entanglements.)

Your description of it as familial or friendly is simply heinous.

Not exact matches

It's safe to say that with familial expertise, Spieth takes his social media presence seriously, and as an integral part of managing his brand.

Familial responsibility cuts the other way, as well.

So I praise Santorum for choosing to run for president despite the fact that he knew he already had pressing and touchy familial issues that could come into conflict with his duties as a candidate — let alone the ways in which the importance that those particular issues could run counter to what he was obligated to do as president.

Wilcox's welcome study makes a strong case that accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior» or making an equivalent commitment to an ancient and demanding faith» is the best predictor of marital and familial happiness to be found.

Likewise it confuses their discussion of rescuers as exhibiting «extensivity» — a breadth of inclusiveness of all persons as deserving respect, equity, and care — and non-rescuers as being characterized by «constriction» — a restriction of equity and respect to one's familial, ethnic, or tribal grouping.

The reasoning, as was explained to me was that it was thought a good shepherd could not lead if distracted by his own familial flock [this aside from the fact that a youngest son in a family would typically not inherit enough to support a family and was therefore sent to join a church].

Part of the shocking revelation that Jesus brought us is that God doesn't just want us to go to a happy, peaceful place, but that he's inviting us to enter into a familial relationship with Him and as His children we will live with Him, do things with Him and and work with Him (and consequentially each other, forming a body that is One).

They generate a sense of accountability for what we do, and hold universally «for persons simply as persons» (in contrast to obligations of a particular legal or familial nature).

Still, there's plenty of good about living in America, as I see every day in the patriotic, familial, Christian, charitable, entrepreneurial, techno - savvy, honorable, violent, and leisurely South.

The familial structure referenced in the household codes was that of pater familias [father of the family], which positioned the man as the ruler and authority over an economic / familial unit which consisted of the ruling patriarch, his wife, children and slaves.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

The structure of that world centered around the pater familias [father of the family] as the ruler and authority over an economic / familial unit — the household, which consisted of the ruling patriarch, his wife, children and slaves.

We would concur with Mr Bogle about the excesses of feminism, as we expect would the poem's author, given its traditional familial focus.

The legitimacy and authority of all our institutions, political, economic, educational, even familial, as well as religious, has now never been shakier.

He purchases the cave at Machpelah as a burial place for Sarah, a deed simultaneously of familial and political significance; done not least for Isaac's and his descendants» sake (Abraham will also be buried here, as will Isaac and Rebekah, Jacob and Leah), the ground is consecrated as a memorial, helping to keep alive in memory the deeds of the founding mothers and fathers.

Even if the human person is most himself and freest when least encumbered with social, traditional, religious or familial ties, society is a necessary evil which protects as much as possible the freedom of the individual without being much of a threat to it.

The state's right to invade this area of human relationship is justified only when it can be shown that rights beyond the realm of familial authority are being violated, as, for example, when children are being abused.

So this year, as we gather together in the presence of blood that is familial, foreign, violent, and life - giving, let us thank him who covered us with his own.

This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.

As Hobbes» philosophical successor John Locke understood, voluntarist logic ultimately affects all relationships, including the familial.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words — father, mother, spouse, parents — retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

As expected, I found that most of the folks calling for a return to «biblical womanhood» aren't actually calling for a return to the ancient near Eastern familial structure, but for a return to the nuclear family of pre-1950s America.

We are two nations: one concentrated on rights and laws, the other on rights and wrongs; one radically individualistic and dedicated to the actualized self, the other communal and invoking the common good; one viewing law as the instrument of the will to power and license, the other affirming an objective moral order reflected in a Constitution to which we are obliged; one given to private satisfaction, the other to familial responsibility; one typically secular, the other typically religious; one elitist, the other populist.

Just as in one - to - one relationships the negatives damage and may destroy, so the positives (now applied to familial groupings) will produce right ways of becoming and, hence, promote sound and healthy development.

Self - reliant yet familial immigrants did what was required to succeed in order that their children could go to college and prosper more easily and more honorably as free and equal persons.

Just as God's continuing creative activity does not directly «make» things but rather allows, encourages, and assists them to «make themselves,» so in the familial group we can allow others to «make themselves,» with all the difficulties this may seem to include.

Familial life when at its best is so ordered that the personal quality of others is augmented; they can not be treated as if they were merely objects or things to be used by one person simply to promote that person's own development.

There are a variety of ways in which this is so, but, at the same time, it's clear that certain aspects of pagan familial virtue are not exactly incompatible with the Biblical sacred order that can check or overcome their excesses and pathologies — just as the Biblical order imposes powerful interdicts, not to be confused with taboos, against the kind of violent desires that, to the morbid fascination of the ancient Greeks, deconstructed and destroyed the identities of family - bound individuals.

If Christianity is skittish at best about familial nobility and not just dignity, as a pridefully creative project of life - defining meaning, is it not remarkable that the most venomous and blatant of the anti-Christian philosophers is so circumspect and muted on the matter?

They have no familial memory of the Carter inflation, the property tax revolts, the failure of wage and price controls in the 1970s, the post-1964 increase in crime, or how «bracket creep» increased people's tax rates even as their purchasing power was declining.

The church's DNA, having been breathed into us by God thru Christ, is familial, nurturing, covenental & lifelong, as our natural biological DNA mirrors, when it's healthy.

Even if we connect vocation not only with work but also with the domestic and familial responsibilities so essential to life, there may be other duties that call us as well.

In our day, government has left aside most of the «mutual» components in favor of a pure will to power, which Scruton mistakenly sees as a danger primarily in familial and tribal associations.

My concern is to show that in each of the several topics to be considered — Christianity as an organic whole; the fact of evil known to every one of us; the meaning of human personality in itself, in its familial, and in its social aspects; and the religious community — becoming and belonging must be taken with utmost seriousness.