In a highly controversial decision that led to backlash by certain states, the Supreme Court lifted the per se veil from these controversial vertical agreements and declared that, at least as far
as federal antitrust law is concerned, courts should analyze resale price maintenance under the rule of reason.
Not exact matches
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company conspired with other dental supply companies to violate
federal antitrust laws; (ii) discovery of the foregoing conduct would subject the Company to heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential criminal sanctions; and (iii) that
as a result of the foregoing, Henry Schein's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
NRF has argued before Congress and in court that the practice is a violation of
federal antitrust law the same
as if retailers were to collude on the price of specific pieces of merchandise.
In 1911 a
Federal court ruled DuPont in violation of
antitrust laws, and the following year ordered the complete dissolution of Eastern
as part of a remedy.
In the United States, the
federal government enforces
antitrust laws and regulations to try to maintain effective levels of competition in
as many markets
as possible; frequently, however,
laws and regulations also have unintended effects for example reducing competition.
During
law school, she was the Editor - in - Chief of the Berkeley Business Law Journal, clerked at the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, and served as a research assistant to revise an antitrust law textbo
law school, she was the Editor - in - Chief of the Berkeley Business
Law Journal, clerked at the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, and served as a research assistant to revise an antitrust law textbo
Law Journal, clerked at the
Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, and served
as a research assistant to revise an
antitrust law textbo
law textbook.
Our attorneys regularly litigate complex unfair trade practices,
antitrust, business torts and contract actions against major regional and national
law firms and often serve
as local counsel to out - of - state firms engaged in litigation in Connecticut state and
federal courts.
On April 5, 2013, Google officially submitted a request with the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that it sanction the activities of «patent trolls»
as violations of the
antitrust laws.
Instead, the issue was whether the dental board was acting under a doctrine that would give it,
as a «state actor,» immunity from claims of anti-competitive conduct in violation of
federal antitrust law.
For more than a century,
federal antitrust laws have existed
as a way to promote competition and prevent monopolies in business.
NAR argued that it was inappropriate for the court to review the policy because there was no relief for the court to order even if it found that the VOW policy had violated
federal antitrust law,
as NAR had already voluntarily rescinded the policy.