Sentences with phrase «as give more money»

Moreover, when party members attack in succession, you create a combo that deals extra damage, as well as give more money and XP at the end of the battle.
If an A player says he is leaving, you'll do whatever you need to keep them such as giving them more money, more responsibility, whatever.

Not exact matches

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.
Some wage experts say New York's move is a positive development, as it will give many low - income workers more money to spend locally, which will create a ripple effect in the economy.
Here is a little secret: If there is something that you truly want next year — such as more money, more support or an amazing mentor — go out and give it away.
Build a production - based economy and mindset with a compensation program that gives incentives for hitting objectives, such as more money or other bonuses (iPads, Disney trip, time off, etc.).
By giving your money more time to compound and keeping your rate of return as high as possible, you greatly increase your chances of reaching a seven - figure net worth,» writes Brian Feroldi on The Motley Fool.
For instance, they'll be less happy and more stressed (which affects things like their productivity and creativity); they may quit on you (which will cost you and your company time and money); they may give you bad reviews or complain to HR (which puts your job in jeopardy); and you'll have trouble earning their respect, being viewed as credible, and getting them to listen to your opinions.
Customers are charged a small percentage based on how much money is in an account and as an added perk, they will also give you an incentive to invest more by reducing fees.
It would seem that giving artists more avenues to earn money can only be in Spotify's best interests as a growing enterprise, especially with the imminent launch of music streaming service Beats Music, from music industry veterans Dr. Dre, Jimmy Iovine and Trent Reznor.
Gibney argued for why that's easy, as well as shed new light on what happens inside the firm, and what its road map looks given that it has more money to invest than ever before.
As Town says, it makes no sense to give a business your money to build its brand and make more products if you don't actually like that business.
«We are seeing that our focus on the middle class, by putting more money in the pockets of hard working families, and giving less advantages to the wealthiest, is growing the economy,» Trudeau said, as he also attempted to distract the media horde from his finance minister's loose interpretation of what constitutes a conflict of interest.
Cohen, who typically manages $ 2 billion to $ 3 billion in what is known as the Cohen Account, has cut his trading to the lower end of that range and has given more money to deputies who help him run the portfolio, three of the people said.
They advocate giving more money to the banks, hoping that somehow everything will be okay, as if the banks would lend out the money to fund new...
Each share is given a specific dollar amount that it will be allotted, thus, the more shares you own, the more money you would receive as...
Financially parasitized companies use corporate income to buy back their stock to support its price — and hence, the value of stock options that financial managers give themselves — and borrow yet more money for stock buybacks or simply to pay out as dividends.
So the more money you go and raise when you don't have any revenue yet, as people observe if they ever watched Dragons» Den or Shark Tank, is the more of the business you give up — because they say well, your business has no value.
Just as we have a mission in early retirement to figure out what we want to do when we grow up, and to adventure more, we also have a mission to be more charitable, both by volunteering and by giving money directly to important causes.
Increasingly, as this latest filing shows, conservative donors are choosing to funnel their money through Donors Trust instead of giving it themselves, meaning more of the money fueling conservative politics is draped in secrecy.
For Casper, the new money gives it the funds to continue to expand into new products and invest in marketing as it tries to become known for more than just mattresses and break away from a pack of competitors like Leesa and Tuft & Needle, which have raised little to no venture capital but are still growing.
«Give to the Red Cross» doesn't cut it with a growing number of people these days, though quite a few media organizations and civic leaders have urged people to send their money to the American Red Cross, as they have done for more than a century.
Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, gave a speech on 2 March on the future of money and how the UK central bank can help manage the potential risks, as well as realise the promise of, more than a thousand virtual or cryptocurrencies.
As people gave away the money, they ended up giving more — their time, their skills, their connections, their love.
As an example, we have all sat through a missions conference where the emphasis of a sermon was on the meaning of the word «Go» in Matthew 28:19, but the only call to action at the end of the message was to give more money when the plate was passed.
After further disputations, and a failed attempt to give Francis money and presents, the perplexed Sultan was even more inclined to admire the Poverello, as a «man different from all others.»
This is why we launched The Frontline this week as a monthly giving community where we give more than just our money, we give ourselves.
a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)
Sister Sledge wonders why he's the greatest dancer, and given what the great Albert Murray says in Stompin'the Blues about the likes of Louis Armstrong and Miles Davis, they are right to so wonder — dancing ability often is a sign of musical intelligence, and is often linked with good fashion sense, even if the latter is a more surface sort of excellence, in that it obviously requires the money and leisure to purchase the clothes, or as Aristotle might say, the «equipment.»
What did romney give to his church, about 4million and I want to say that is very good but as a christain, when you give you do not expect anything back but do you know how much all these people that give get back from what they gave, Romney got more than half of that money back this last year and he would have got almost everything back and is that giving.
And, as affluent volunteers and congregations back home get excited about seeing that their surplus wealth can make a difference, the new pattern of giving may yield more money.
They know that if they start asking the wealthy to give more money, the wealthy will hit back by demanding churches pay taxes and share their wealth as well.
And, as though this foreigner had not already done so much more than enough, the story continues that «on the morrow when he departed, he took out some money and gave it to the host and said to him, «Take care of him and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay!»»
And, as I said, I give a lot on the individual level, because I find it gets more done than throwing money into big organizations that eat up the $ $ in administrative costs.
Despite how this passage is sometimes used in sermons and books as an attempt to get the rich to give more money to the church, the point of this passage actually lies elsewhere.
Some of The Simpsons church humor is a mild sort, typical of an earlier era of churchgoing about sleep - inducing sermons or tactics to elicit more money in the offering («And as we pass the collection plate, please give as if the person next to you was watching,» Lovejoy intones).
We try as hard as we can to give as much aid as we can, and I'm sure other churches do too, but if everyone put forth even more effort, religion would once again become a key part of society and the government would have a little bit more money to work with.
These «prosperity gospel» preachers have a few motives other than the milk of human kindness... prosperous followers have more money to give to the churches, and unfortunately, money is power, so the churches will wield more of it as a result.
The alcohol industry generates more than $ 400 billion annually, but as more states begin to legalize marijuana, the cannabis industry is giving Big Alcohol a run for its money.
Many fans bark on about Usmanov NOT really eing a fan and while I realise that he is a businessman first and foremost he IS a football fan far more than Silent Stan as has been proved by his giving money to the Russian FA recently.
Boycotting AFC and not giving money over to AFC would hurt him more as it would hurt the value of the club.
A move wouldn't actually be surprising as there is an existing relationship between the two clubs, Real paid Newcastle more than 10 million pounds for no reason a couple of years ago, and then Newcastle gave the money back just for fun last season.
i think we need to finish in the top 3.2 nd or 3rd doesn't matter to me because they are both automatic qualification spots.2 nd place means slightly more money and it may give the club more confidence, but it is the the 1st of the losers in reality.I think if we come 2nd which we probably will it may well hurt us, i know it sounds strange but i think Wenger will take 2nd place as a vindication an refuse to buy any1 as usual.
We don't really have the money, we are not a big club in comparison any more, the football world has left Wenger behind and MOST OF ALL the board don't give a shit so long as they make the shareprice ect.
I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.
Given that Arsenal, as a global business corporation, enjoy huge financial success (currently in the 6 highest revenues in the world and the 3rd highest in the EPL), and the chronic underinvestment relative to the 2 Manchester's, Chelsea and Liverpool — the question has to be asked; Why aren't we spending more money on the squad?
I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew
He might have money but nobody is going to want to give him a pass, more likely they'll dig in and try to nail his hide to a wall as a trophy.
I also think that an early move could help us persuade the Saints to sell, as it gives them more time to use the money to sign a replacement or two, rather than leaving it to the last minute and making them determined not to lose one of their main men.
If he is given more money he will only waste it on more crap players such as Xhaka.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z