Sentences with phrase «as global warming alarmists»

Comments Off on My Financial Post op - ed: Polar bears keep thriving even as global warming alarmists keep pretending they're dying

Not exact matches

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

So the alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «Getting Warmer.»

Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as alarmist.

However, when people use the term «catastrophic anthropogenic global warming» they are not referring to any real science but are attempting to paint anyone who talks about the science as an alarmist.

As for the global warming alarmist....

If science advocacy has to include statements such as «Alas, as with most over-simplified global warming claptrap, more thought goes into coming up with the alarmist concept than in actually looking into whether or not it is true», then I don't think it belongs in the discussion.

CO2 Science misrepresents Doran's study as a «major blow to the CO2 - induced global warming hypothesis... many a climate alarmist jumped on the global warming bandwagon... however, the bottom began to fall out of the poorly constructed bandwagon, as the evidentiary glue that held it together began to weaken.»

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

We need to not be alarmist about the potential of this alarm, but realize that it is something to be alarmed about if we let this «little» global warming thing go too far... on top of the other reasonably alarming things that are already going on, such as hitting thermal limits for crops, etc..

Even as many promoting the global - warming theory have moderated their language in the interest of restoring credibility, others on the same side of the table have actually employed more alarmist language, as if to compensate for the lack of climatic temperature increase by turning up the verbal heat.

The Little Ice Age is troublesome for global - warming alarmists, since historical evidence suggests the period had extremely low global temperatures, which began recovering only as recently as the mid-19th century.

IMO, global warming alarmists (as well as GMO and nuclear alarmists) are a subset of people who either haven't looked at the issue because they assume someone else has, or haven't scrutinized it because they don't want it scrutinized.

In other words, «Forecast the Facts» was originally conceived as a front group controlled by far - left advocacy groups to hide behind while attacking meteorologists, who surveys show tend to be very skeptical of the claims of global warming alarmists.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has been vigorously attacked by some environmentalists and global warming alarmists who view it as a threat to their claim of a «consensus» in favor of their extreme views.

The reason it disappeared wasn't due to rising sea - levels from global warming as the «alarmists» would like you to believe.

As a result, global warming alarmists get a pass on claiming to be helping the poor by fighting global warming.

The fraudulent data is then fed to the sycophant, global warming alarmist mainstream media, published as gospel, and voilà — the «Climate Change Crisis» is born!

The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too alarmist».

As usual the global warming alarmists / leftists only look at the tip of the ice berg (pun intended) and neglect the rest of the facts that actually trashes their argument.

All or part of what passes among Alarmists as «global warming» could be the result of interactions among myriad phenomena that redistribute temperatures.

Global warming alarmists (many of them the same who predicted a New Ice Age in the 1970s) ignore, or evade, such awkward facts as the greatly increased CO2 production worldwide for 30 years after 1941, when heavy industry increased immensely for armaments in WWII, and for rebuilding and consumer goods like cars in the postwar boom in the Americas, Europe and Asia — while global temperatures simultaneouslyGlobal warming alarmists (many of them the same who predicted a New Ice Age in the 1970s) ignore, or evade, such awkward facts as the greatly increased CO2 production worldwide for 30 years after 1941, when heavy industry increased immensely for armaments in WWII, and for rebuilding and consumer goods like cars in the postwar boom in the Americas, Europe and Asia — while global temperatures simultaneouslyglobal temperatures simultaneously fell.

WHEN you are a man - made global warming alarmist prosecuting your case as «unprecedented», you need to make sure that no recent climate era was as warm or warmer than the present, even if that means having to rewrite the past to fit your theory.

«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton — using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the global - warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial alarmists.

The man - made global warming narrative remained intact in the media in spite of various IPCC's alarmist claims being proven as false.

«We should be growing more trees and using more wood,» says Moore, but the global warming alarmists refer to the forests as «carbon stocks» that must not be used.

The National Center for Science Education has adopted as part of its mission the task of attacking researchers and commentators who question the biased and alarmist position on global warming staked out by the Obama administration and environmental advocacy groups, so Steven Newton's highly critical essay comes as no surprise.

As such, alarmists aren't just questioning the value of continuing the global warming debate; their approach also calls into question the scientific method, which has been used successfully in its current form since the Enlightenment.

I could only laugh as ridiculous CO2 alarmists who metamorphosed a local disaster, brought about by ignorance of natural coastal changes, into a global warming «crystal ball».

From New Zealand comes another example of climate alarmists «adjusting» temperatures upward to claim global warming that isn't, in fact, occurring, as shown by Joanne Nova «s excellent blog.

Global warming science facts from new research indicates that ENSO will not become a permanent feature as speculated by the IPCC's resident AGW alarmists - the massive climate phenomenon will remain variable

You can be the biggest, most risible assclown in the history of junk statistics and pseudoscience but so long as you can somehow cobble together a half - way plausible paper, no matter how inept your methodology, which helps prop up the vast man - made global warming industry then you have it made: the President of the USA will Tweet you; your University will back you to the hilt; your colleagues will rally round you; you will get a very favourable write - up in the Guardian (and myriad other alarmist publications); your critics will be sidelined and ignored.

The litany of failed, alarmist predictions is why scientific organisations, such as the BoM, have — tragically — become almost the last places to hear the truth about global warming climate change.

Some actions by the President of the United States can have far - reaching international consequences, including something so trivial as how he reacts to a particular global warming alarmist book.

«December 2017: Warming / Climate Doomsdayer Alarmist Rhetoric Heats Up As Globe Freezes Main Review: 2017 Empirical Evidence of Catastrophic Global Warming Per The Gold - Standard Science»

I was very skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (though not the possibility of some AGW) from the moment I heard about it as a major political movement, because it «smelled» to much like the Alarmist «Population Bomb» and «Peek Oil» movements, and was being pushed by many of the same kind of people.

As can be seen, the satellite empirical evidence after 30 + years does not readily support the climate - alarmist AGW theory, nor the doomsday predictions of global warming hell.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

Since the «runaway» and «accelerating» scenarios have been ginormous scientific failures, as previously discussed, AGW scientists and alarmists / advocates are having to seriously re-think the basic assumptions of catastrophic global warming.

The alarmists at the IPCC and «Big Green» like to point to the gigantic icebergs produced by Antarctica as proof that global warming is directly melting the polar continent with high temperatures.

Moreover, as I've argued here previously, the emphasis, or hope that science can conclusively answer the debate about global warming almost concedes to the alarmist / precautionary perspective that, if «climate change is happening», then so the policies are justified.

The «hockey stick» graph was touted by global warming alarmists as evidence of rapidly rising temperatures and as justification for government action to curb carbon dioxide emissions.

As a consequence of the towering example AGW True Believers bring to high science of approximating reality let us enumerate a sufficient example of their inability and fundamental inadequacy on the numerous occasions afforded them from the inception of their undertaking to effectuate an adequate understanding of the issues to be ascertained: The Global Warming Alarmists Still Don't Get It: It's The Sun, Stupid.

The UN's IPCC and associated climate alarmist scientists predicted that severe weather would increase globally as a result of human - caused global warming.

Climate change alarmists, many of whom write for professional climate tabloids where global warming fiction reigns, often speak to the detrimental global warming impact on species such as the polar bear and the caribou.

But yet the language of the global warming alarmist, is to accuse anyone who does not believe in man - made climate change as a «denier», a heretic, a blasphemer.

As the actual climate truths and realities are finally being reported by the world's press (Der Spiegel, The Financial Times, etc.), the UN's global warming chief alarmist continues with delusional denial.

I've come to the conclusion that the paper acts as an excellent carrot, which when combined with the terrible example of Mann's floundering to defend the indefensible (as the stick) may tempt some people to row back from some silly alarmist positions they've taken on global warming.

To date, the electric utility industry has aided and abetted the climate alarmist cause, if not by actually lobbying for global warming regulation, then at least by its willingness to entertain such regulation as public policy worthy of serious consideration.

His critique was, however, widely misrepresented by climate deniers as proving that the IPCC's scientific verdict about the dangers of global warming are too alarmist.