One of my chief frustrations with the whole topic is how partial information, and extrapolated conjectures from it, are treated
as Holy Writ, not to be questioned, and ironclad proof of the «mainstream» narrative.
Davey's Law is that anyone who regards «biodiversity», «environment» or the «Precautionary Principle»
as Holy Writ has lost the argument on grounds of logical incapacity.
Take her word
as holy writ and go and read.
Not exact matches
The fact that England had this
Holy House, that it was Mary's land, that it honoured marriage
as Pope St Gregory wished, led over centuries to that long continuity of our institutions, in which Christian values became
writ large in national life.
Although the early Christian writers had the Old Testament
as their Scriptures, not one of them had any idea that he was writing something that would itself become
Holy Writ.
First, you make the impression that the IPCC TAR, the «consensus»
as discussed in previous posts, is some kind of
holy writ to be taken on faith.
If you wish to cite
Holy Writ once again to prove that this is not possible, there's not much else one can say other than to mention that someone who has never traded options should not imho be holding himself out
as an authority.
The HEX fund, to which you have applied the study conclusions
as if they are
Holy Writ, is a different & more flexible animal with hand - picked canadian stock underlyings plus 60 - day calls or longer, along with the possibility of higher strikes.
CO2 and global warming there are some things taken
as «
holy writ» which are based on assumptions made by other people and presented
as real.
And your quote mining from the IPCC
as if it is
holy writ is reminding me more and more about the religious zealots I mentioned before,
so you can sarcastically dismiss the IPCC
as «the
holy writ», but it is incumbent on john quiggin to address each and every argument mcintyre makes on the merits?
It has its own high priests such
as Al Gore and a
holy writ, such
as the IPCC reports.
First, you make the impression that the IPCC TAR, the «consensus»
as discussed in previous posts, is some kind of
holy writ to be taken on faith.
So again, think about these questions without simply dismissing them
as contradicting
Holy Writ: