Sentences with phrase «as homosexual when»

Collinsworth said Dromm, an openly gay man, had not yet come out as homosexual when he was arrested for prostitution.

Not exact matches

Thiel says he himself was a victim of the blurring of that line when Gawker outed him as a homosexual in 2007 without his permission.

Relatively faster performance when the task involved moving the manikin toward the gay male couple was taken as a sign of implicit attraction, rather than aversion, toward homosexual men.

This being said, when gay and lesbians want to promote their views as normal or that would be permissible for a priest or bishop to be a practising homosexual, I disagree based on the clear statements of Scripture.

But perfect love casts out fear... if he perfectly loved, there would be no reason for him fear that we are destroying America... no fear for us to teach sunday school... and no fear of the future when homosexuals are accepted as equals, even in Alabama (where I live) or in whatever southern state fishon is in.

Laycock's hypothesis ripened into full - blown suspicion by June 2000 when Justice Stevens took the position that the free speech rights of the Boy Scouts were not violated by a state law requiring them to employ an avowed homosexual as an assistant scoutmaster.

So Steve, You believe that a person who, as you say, belongs to Christ, and is a practicing homosexual when they die, they are going to heaven?

When he answers that he believes the Scriptures refer to homosexual activity as sin, they do not join our community.

It will be the Church which defends the dignity of all persons when the levers of power move from the present hegemony that favours the homosexual lobby to another hegemony that may just as easily not.

We've isolated and condemned homosexuality as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a sexual thing (and we're obsessed with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from others people's eyes.)

As you may have heard, Pope Francis sent an electric shock through the world yesterday when he told reporters on his plane that he did not condemn homosexual priests.

-- especially when, as most of you would know, the law prohibiting homosexual behavior is imbedded in a context in Leviticus in the holiness code, the purity code, as it's sometimes called, which also prohibits the planting of two kinds of seed in the same field, or the wearing of garments made of two kinds of cloth.

The topic of debate shifted to homosexuality when Mr Schofield asked Mrs Williams whether she would encourage someone identifying as homosexual to seek help.

Olson also invoked «fundamental rights» and was queried by Justice Scalia as to just exactly when it became unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage: 1791 with the Bill of Rights, 1868 with the 14th Amendment, or some other date, perhaps after the Court declined in 1971 to review a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding opposite - sex marriage requirements?

Under ordinances forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, churches have been taken to court for refusing to hire a homosexual as church organist or as teacher in the church school, ministries to the poor have lost their funding when they refused to tolerate homosexual behavior within their programs, and a Jesuit university was required to give recognition and support to a gay rights group.

In the present volume there are repeated and sometimes moving narratives of a sense of «coming home» upon joining the homosexual community, much as Cardinal Newman and other converts have written about «coming home» when they joined the Roman Catholic Church.

When he asked for a referral to see a Catholic therapist, she all but called him crazy for refusing to give in to his nature as homosexual.

As to when this idea that people weren't actually JUST heterosexual is a little more difficult to point to because same - sex relationships are all over ancient documents but it appears the concept came about circa - 1700s and the actual word homosexual came out a century and a half later.

«Scripture's male - female prerequisite for marriage and its attendant rejection of homosexual behavior is pervasive throughout both Testaments of Scripture (i.e. it is everywhere presumed in sexual discussions even when not explicitly mentioned); it is absolute (i.e. no exceptions are ever given, unlike even incest and polyamory); it is strongly proscribed (i.e. every mention of it in Scripture indicates that it is regarded as a foundational violation of sexual ethics); and it is countercultural (i.e. we know of no other culture in the ancient Near East or Greco - Roman Mediterranean basin more consistently and strongly opposed to homosexual practice).

Please explain to my ignorant worldview how Romans 1:18 - 32 does not at least speak of homosexual activity as perversion and how 1 Corinthians 6 does not speak against the homosexual act when the Greek Paul used clearly states in his sin list both partners in the homosexual act.

When it comes to being a homosexual, my personal opinion as a Christian is that I do not judge anyone, lest I be judged.

In this period of history, when militant homosexuals not only reveal their liaisons and lifestyles but actively and articulately promote the homosexual relationship as a morally acceptable alternative to marriage, legislation that would require the military to accept homosexuals would do much more to violate the rights of heterosexual military personnel than it would to promote the rights of homosexuals.

But if that's so, he notes, then it should govern the way Christians think about same - sex sexual activity as well, and thus he concludes: «When those with homosexual orientation act on their desires in a loving, committed relationship, [they] are not, as far as I can see, violating the love command.»

When seen as a life orientation, the issue raised for the church is no longer that of the sexual behavior of homosexual Christians.

It is also a fear of being perceived as being homosexual, especially among men.5 The fear of being perceived as gay usually begins in elementary school when «girl,» «sissy,» or «fag» are the worst put - downs a boy can hear.

Even today when pressures such as «outing» seek to enforce a gay identity on all homosexuals, many of them take the view that homosexuality is just one facet of their identity - whether an advantage, or a curse, or simply a slightly awkward fact about themselves - which has little bearing on the rest of their lives outside the bedroom.

I would give my life for any homosexual man or women — I would gladly give my life in exchange for theirs if it come to the crunch but I still speak out against the sin of homosexuality... What you must understand is that it is a judgment of God when a nation turns away from God — The whole world is turning away from God and we need to stand against the teaching of the world... it is also a sign of the times as spoken of in timothy 1 and 2.

But the storm really broke when The Advocate, a newspaper by and for homosexuals, quoted Rooney as saying that blacks have «watered down their genes because the less intelligent ones are the ones that have the most children.»

She answered: «Very often when we see children identifying as homosexual, it is not good for them to live out in a such a lifestyle.

When the teachings of the Church are attacked and their advocates described publicly as bigots, who is there to come forward to restate and defend the universal principles that underlie Catholic doctrine on abortion, homosexual and extramarital sex, euthanasia and so forth?

First of all... when God gives us «what to do» we ought not try to undermine the word of GOD... if the racist would study he would find that it is a sin to make differences in people... if the homosexual studied they would find that God said «Man is not to lay with man as with woman....

Some pretenders are easy to spot, as when Christian Traina's Feminist Ethics and Natural Law tries to justify homosexual marriage on the warrant that «natural law's concrete conclusions are dynamic and humanly generated to the same degree that humanity is.»

When the terrorist attacks killed thousands of people on 9/11/2001, some Christians said this was God's judgment upon wickedness in our country, and specifically condemned feminists, abortionists, and homosexuals as the cause for this attack.

I believe that when Bishop Niederauer and many others caution against thinking of homosexual orientation as the cause of sexual abuse, they are asserting that we, and the Vatican, would do better to focus less on the content of a person's sexual fantasies and more on his or her ability to control his or her sexual desires.

Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.

If and when the church moves toward such liturgical recognition, it should also work for legal recognition of homosexual unions, involving such matters as tax laws and inheritance rights.

As previously mentioned, this situation happened with station WFAA in Dallas, which was asked for equal time under the FCC Fairness Doctrine when religious broadcaster James Robison attacked homosexuals on one of his programs.

You should also discuss that it is inappropriate to use sexual orientation or sexual activity in insults or bullying (slut - shaming, using homosexual terms as an insult, etc.) and how to react when peers do so.

A Tory MP prompted outrage when he railed against the «aggressive homosexual community» today, as the Commons debate on gay marriage became increasingly heated.

There is no reason why you should let these feelings overcome you, or let other opinions of those you care about, such as family members or friends, negatively influence your life when it comes to finding love, relationships, and homosexual dating.

As for Chalamet, the Lady Bird scene stealer admitted his parents had seen the coming - of - age homosexual movie, but he fears his grandma «is going to be in shock when she does.»

He directs Brendan Fraser as a man defined by his physical strength and capable of using it, when he feels violated by James Whale's homosexual overtures.

posits that we lose something when we «see through» Burt's dance with his buddies as smirkingly homosexual; when we don't think of our starlets as fresh off the bus; when we refuse to accept things at face value.

Even in New York itself I will sometimes hear the question, from the ld men on the Coney Island boardwalk who knew Irving Lefkowitz when he was a bar mitzvah boy and who, from their benches on the Brooklyn beach, envision the long and slender island of Manhattan as an urban Titanic, sinking beneath the weight of criminals, homosexuals, and atheists,...

As a bisexual white male I sometimes really just want devs to stop trying to represent the homosexual part of my sexuality in gaming media... I do enjoy when they put quirky hints and jokes about the topic, but... I du n no, it feels so manipulative and forced...

One gallery will feature avant - garde photography made in and around the 1930s, a decade so apposite for our times, as well as moments of homosocial intimacy captured by photographer Alice Austen in the 1890s, an era when «invert» meant homosexual.

For example, bisexual people are often categorized as «homosexual» in such studies, and then when they enter a heterosexual relationship, it is considered a successful «conversion.»

When compared with heterosexual people, homosexual and bisexual people are twice as likely to experience anxiety (31.5 per cent compared with 14.1 per cent) and three times as likely to experience depression and related disorders (19 per cent compared with 6 per cent).