Not exact matches
Although the FAA defines autopilot systems much the way Tesla does —
as something that can assist a
human who must nevertheless remain alert and ready to take over — popular
perception is that autopilot systems can fly planes on their own while the pilots nap.
The value of Schilt's work is in its use of the experiences of extraordinary people
as a lens to reveal how the value of
human capital — an individual's education, experience and abilities — is tied to gender
perceptions.
It would be otiose to give examples: a distant thunder is in the past
as much
as a distant star; but no matter how far in time - space a star or galaxy is, it is always faintly immanent in my Here - Now even when its action is below the threshold of
human perception; its action can be made visible by a combination of lenses or a prolonged photographic exposure.
Since God is seen
as a «father,» our
perception of our own
human fathers can dictate our view of God.
to Jake, in every era or times in the past,
humans have different
perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet
as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science
as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become
humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.
Our
perception of the structure of reality changes
as we become aware of new areas of
human experience and knowledge.
When I realize that the particular conclusions generated by the serious reflection that arises from such assumptions have only the authority of those assumptions, then I feel free to turn to another philosophy that includes among its data
human persons and their interactions; for my
perception of reality is such that these seem to me at least
as real and ultimate
as sense data and mechanical relations.
your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas
as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no
humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your
perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.
Christian Scientists see these events not
as supernatural interruptions of the natural order but
as a revelatory appearance of a spiritual reality, shaking the very foundations of
human perception.
Teilhard's importance, Berry believes, lies in his comprehensive vision of the universe
as a psychic - spiritual
as well
as a physical - material process, his
perception of the
human as the consciousness of the universe, and his shifting of the focus of Western religious concern from redemption to creation.
This revelation is natural, in the sense that it is part and parcel of both the creation and
human nature, and it is general, inasmuch
as it is a functional component in all
human perception and cognition.
Stories can affect the world directly,
as well
as through
human perception.
However, they see the finitude of God's creation not
as his creative will but
as the way creation appears within the habitual limits of
human perception.
We must remember that Whitehead is not a metaphysician seeking to describe the ultimate facts of existence (so WM 17 - 20), but a realist philosopher of science remarking on uniquely
human matters such
as perception and freedom.
As a result sufficiently varied forms of mind or experience, some vastly different from human minds or experiences, could without contradiction be thought to relate themselves as molecules, atoms, or particles do to one another, and to our perception
As a result sufficiently varied forms of mind or experience, some vastly different from
human minds or experiences, could without contradiction be thought to relate themselves
as molecules, atoms, or particles do to one another, and to our perception
as molecules, atoms, or particles do to one another, and to our
perceptions.
Although many of those concerned for environmental protection are thinking about the natural world simply
as it relates to
human beings, the leaders of the environmental movement have been moved to
perception and action by deeper changes.
There is an intellectual seductiveness to the idea of one blazing sun of truth, seen imperfectly from different viewing points in
human history, with the
perception becoming ever more ample
as the different views are correlated and added up.
The philosophy of organism of Process and Reality is an ambitious attempt to extend descriptions of
human experiencing that we give with such terms
as «sensation», «
perception», «sensory image», and «judgment» to the experiencing of subhuman organisms.
As is well known, there are many significant points of divergence between the two philosophers, but we shall keep to our topic of human experience as manifested in its basic mode, primitive perceptio
As is well known, there are many significant points of divergence between the two philosophers, but we shall keep to our topic of
human experience
as manifested in its basic mode, primitive perceptio
as manifested in its basic mode, primitive
perception.
Whitehead's use of assumptions dating back to Descartes and Locke in his account of
perception leaves him vulnerable to the criticisms introduced by the revolution in philosophic method taking place at the time he was writing his major works, one in which the analysis of the functioning of language was replacing psychological introspection
as the principal method for understanding
human thought.
Second, unlike Hume's «
perceptions,» and unlike intellectual insight, responsibility is experienced not
as transient and contingent but
as a constant of
human subjectivity.
He works from the writings of philosophers who take
human perception as their starting point.
Artificial Intelligence (AI), according to the Oxford English Dictionary, focuses on the study of «computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring
human intelligence — such
as visual
perception, speech recognition, decision - making, and translation between languages».
Berger's answer is that religion has no monopoly on morality,
as morality is grounded in
human perception rather than norms (i.e., good and bad).
As Walter Lippmann said in his groundbreaking book Public Opinion,
humans act in the real world on the basis of the
perceptions created increasingly for us by the media's pseudo-environment.
In a stroke, then, Russell is able to dispense with Meinong's ontological conundrum and the ontological argument, while providing
as adequate an account
as anyone has ever been able to offer of how normal
human perception and sense data relate to the «objects» of physics.
He was not, for example, particularly hospitable to the American realists» attempts to reconceive the very notion of experience upon which empiricism should be founded, preferring instead to join Moore and others in England in a virtually uncritical acceptance of the older «commonsense» notion of experience
as human (and usually visual)
perception derived from their seventeenth - century cultural predecessors Locke and Hume.2
Furthermore,
human sense
perception is only to be understood
as a condition of the possibility of intellectual cognition, posited by spirit in contradistinction to itself but for itself, and consequently once again affirms the kinship of spirit and matter.
What I want to suggest is that we have to see the work of God in Christ
as that which secures against the ever - present menace of their dissolution, our frail, but genuine,
human perceptions and affirmations (in action) of the morally excellent.
If all
human experience arises from sensation, and if sensation is understood
as what Whitehead calls «
perception in the mode of presentational immediacy,» then indeed each of us is shut in to her or his immediate experience.
Accordingly, Whitehead might have been completely correct in relation to psychogenesis if he considered the object
perception of reality
as the result of
human practice, that is, of the understandable association with artifacts and particularly with machines.
Even
as he's evoking insect life in terms that recall the domesticity of The Wind in the Willows, he wants to write about the natural world
as if he had access to it independently of our
perception of it in
human terms»
as if he were capable of seeing the Insect - in - Itself instead of the insect
as seen by a man.
But the whole array of our instances leads to a conclusion something like this: It is
as if there were in the
human consciousness a sense of reality, a feeling of objective presence, a
perception of what we may call «something there,» more deep and more general than any of the special and particular «senses» by which the current psychology supposes existent realities to be originally revealed.
Thus that
perception of external control which is so essential a feature in conversion might, in some cases at any rate, be interpreted
as the orthodox interpret it: forces transcending the finite individual might impress him, on condition of his being what we may call a subliminal
human specimen.
Monad's were for Leibniz just
as real on the subhuman, even subanimal, levels,
as on the
human level; they were merely much less capable of thought and definite conscious recollections and
perceptions, more limited to simple feeling and extremely short - run memory of what has just happened.
As such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just as Whitehead maintain
As such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in
human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just
as Whitehead maintain
as Whitehead maintains.
Please note, intelligent does not imply a
human like being
as God, by this definition... since part of it is beyond the
human capability of conscious or unconscious
perceptions... so creationists can stop celebrating.
Nevertheless, the layman's common - sense view of reality is baffled by such conundrums
as the nature of time and space, the reality of
human freedom, quantum jumps in physics, or the claim of modern science that colors are not really present in the objects of
perception but only in the mind of the beholder.
I do indeed stand on the distinction between a priori (or metaphysical) and empirical in the sense given this distinction by Popper, except that, whereas Popper defines empirical
as «conceivably falsifiable by observation» and apparently limits observation to certain forms of
human perception, I sometimes include divine
perception (in Whitehead's language, God's physical prehensions).
In
human perception,
as H. H. Price (1932) has shown, the very idea of a material object is dependent upon an element of anticipation.
Perhaps at the level of primary
perception human as well
as other kinds of occasions already have a causal «awareness» of this pervasive sensitivity and at least a vague sense of being deeply felt themselves.
All
human perceptions (and memories) are indistinct, or
as he also, less happily, phrased it, «confused.»
Instead they focused upon the subjective
perceptions and internal anxieties of the
human person
as their point of departure, which for Jaki was all very well
as a second step in theological dialogue but not the first.
As a Christian, I embrace him not because of my belief in universal human goodness or my perception of the commonality of our faiths, but because I am trying to follow a Master who came to me, a stranger, and embraced me as a brother, and who bids me do the same to other
As a Christian, I embrace him not because of my belief in universal
human goodness or my
perception of the commonality of our faiths, but because I am trying to follow a Master who came to me, a stranger, and embraced me
as a brother, and who bids me do the same to other
as a brother, and who bids me do the same to others.
As Dr. Mennella and Dr. Gary K. Beauchamp put it in their 2011 article entitled Flavor
Perception in
Human Infants: Development and Functional Significance, «both before and after birth,
humans are exposed to a bewildering variety of flavors that influence subsequent liking and choice.»
A breastfed baby experiences textural variations such
as viscosity and mouth coating
as well so «breastfeeding provides an even richer variation in oral sensory stimulation»
as stated in Flavor
Perception in
Human Infants.
Being a «beauty queen» is nothing to brag about because «beauty» is a matter of
perception (
as beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder, and is a gift given by Nature that no mortal
human being has any hand in fashioning or overturning.
These had led not only to serious problems - such
as the Bryant murder - but to a mistaken
perception about what the
Human Rights Act was supposed to do.
The concept of cognition is closely related to such abstract concepts
as mind, reasoning,
perception, intelligence, learning, and many others that describe numerous capabilities of
human mind and expected properties of artificial or synthetic intelligence.
It is involved in higher functions such
as sensory
perception, generation of motor commands, spatial reasoning, conscious thought, and in
humans, language.