Sentences with phrase «as if male»

As an educator, too, I just see the percentage of women in art school is often greater than men, but it just seems as if male artists are shown more.

Not exact matches

«If it wasn't for grid work / promotional modelling, I wouldn't be where I am now in a «male dominated» sport and job as a stunt driver and drift competition driver, inspiring and influencing females into this «intimidating male environment.»

And, as she connected founders and investors, she saw that more often than not, it was the white male founders she helped that received the most opportunities: «It became clear really fast that there were certain people who were not getting meetings, even if they had a really great company.»

For instance, if a colleague comments that a women aren't as capable of understanding technology, remind them that CEOs Meg Whitman at HP and Marisa Mayer at Yahoo! have both outlasted their male predecessors.

So if you know, as a woman, that it's going to be a little tougher for you that means you'll have a thicker skin going in there and you have to be ready for a little bit more rejection than your male counterparts.

A superhero isn't meant to be realistic, after all no one cares that, as Advice Columnist Amy Alkon says, «If Superman and Batman were real, at their age, they'd likely have «dad bods» and male pattern baldness.»

If male managers hold on to an unconscious fear that women will be more likely to react emotionally to feedback, their female reports will not receive the same coaching opportunities as their male peers.

These include being frequently interrupted or talked over; having decision - makers primarily address your male colleagues, even if they're junior to you; working harder to receive the same recognition as your male peers; having your ideas ignored unless they're rephrased by your male colleagues; worrying so much about being either «too nice» or «sharp elbowed» that it hurts your ability to be effective; frequently being asked how you manage your work - life balance; and perhaps most difficult of all, not having peers who have been through similar situations to support you during tough times.

For example: «Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, SINCE THE SLAVE IS THEIR PROPERTY.»

Which does mean that if a woman can have sex with a man than a man would be equally free to have sex with a man, as the genders «male and female» are treated the same (i.e. interchangeably).

Mr Ngole, who was studying for a Masters in Social Work, had signalled his opposition to gay marriage before posting part of Leviticus 20:13, which says: «If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.»

If a man can merry a man and a woman can merry a woman then why the hell can't I merry 2 wome n. I'm a streight male and I feel that if you will allow this kind of behavior then why the hell a streight man can't merry as many streight woman as he can afforIf a man can merry a man and a woman can merry a woman then why the hell can't I merry 2 wome n. I'm a streight male and I feel that if you will allow this kind of behavior then why the hell a streight man can't merry as many streight woman as he can afforif you will allow this kind of behavior then why the hell a streight man can't merry as many streight woman as he can afford.

If Jesus were here today, those analogies wouldn't need to be as gender - specific — whether male or female — for us to get their meaning.)

To my mind, if one is looking for a priest, then sure, restrict it to males (although that is still a debatable restriction), but if one recognises Jesus as the one and only priest (1 Tim 2:5 *), there is no debate, and excuse for exclusion.

(Exodus 21:7 - 8) «If a man sells his daughter as a slave, the rules for setting her free are different from the rules for setting the male slaves free.

There are equal number of male and female in this country, minus off gays and lesbians, each man can only have a woman as wife, if not, there'll be not enough women to go around.

Texts such as Leviticus 20:13 («If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death») were frequently cited at the height of the Bloomington controversy, prompting one gay to write to the newspaper and ask: «Is God suggesting that heterosexuals kill us?»

As Jesse Jackson observed in an unguarded moment, if you see five young white males coming from a Bible class on one side of the street and five young black males hanging out on the other side, you have no trouble in knowing which side of the street you want to be on.

But Wilson would have us believe that, if only the church's male members would «man up» and take control over the vexatious vixens among us, we would see the church functioning as it should.

If so, it may be past time for a reality check as he's operating like just another Old Kind of (White Male) Christian.

if the government has to emforce a law to make people understand that something as simple as a male contraceptive or female version will protect them from then spread of disease then so be it.

If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act

As to how such an assertion is possible (even if it is advantageous), Keen tentatively suggests that if our dominant conviction is that our bodies and feelings can be trusted, «the likelihood is that» we will adopt a liberal view of ultimate reality.38 Keen's personal history as an affluent Anglo - Saxon male seems to become crucial at this point, for it allows him an optimism that is incredible considering the tooth - and - nail progression of world historAs to how such an assertion is possible (even if it is advantageous), Keen tentatively suggests that if our dominant conviction is that our bodies and feelings can be trusted, «the likelihood is that» we will adopt a liberal view of ultimate reality.38 Keen's personal history as an affluent Anglo - Saxon male seems to become crucial at this point, for it allows him an optimism that is incredible considering the tooth - and - nail progression of world historas an affluent Anglo - Saxon male seems to become crucial at this point, for it allows him an optimism that is incredible considering the tooth - and - nail progression of world history.

21:7 - 8) «If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do» [God] Notice that God doesn't oppose this at all.

If this avoidance of personal pronouns is found to be clumsy or fails to give a proper sense of God as a being who is related to us in a personal way, then certainly one is free to speak of God both as male and as female so long as these usages are understood to be metaphorical and not to be claiming gender for God, and so long as the male and female references are relatively balanced.

It may seem as if we do because (and this is very important) for centuries, males were viewed as superior and thus held authority over females.

This is a weighty matter if, as I was suggesting yesterday, male and female are needed together for the perfection of creation, just as heaven is not complete without the earth.

If this end were acknowledged, then female warriors would represent the same tragic defeat for humankind as do male warriors.

After all, if marriage requires actions or relations unique to male — female unions, then to say that marriage is between a man and a woman is akin to a tautology, and we could perhaps regard the question of how we approach same - sex relationships as an altogether different issue.

DO listen to your own voice or the Church on social, political and economic issues, and allow people to justify their views on explicitly religious grounds if they want, as long as it's your religion with a monotheistic male deity.

If the passage calls its audience to choose or reject certain actions, as, for example, Paul warned the Galatian males to reject circumcision, it is an example of deliberative rhetoric.

Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.

Felix Ngole, 38, who was studying for a Masters in social work, posted his opinion and quoted Leviticus 20:13: «If a man lies with a male as he lies with...

Indeed, if we include sexual relations (and their absence) as part of a wider account of the Christian life, we will learn, as our lives are drawn further and further into the life of God, more about the undertakings God sets for us by making us male and female.

The problem does not even seem very new, as demonstrated by a passage of the Babylonian Talmud (Chulin 92b) in which it is said that among the few limits that the nations of the world have not exceeded is that they have not yet consented to «writing the Ketubbà for males,» even if they are certainly not attentive to respecting the ban on homosexual practices.

20:13, «If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death.

Also appealing is Epstein's assertion of judgment in such matters as dress («The baseball cap marks a steep decline in elegant male attire» and «The notion of having shined shoes speaks to holding up standards, even if in a very minor way»).

-- Exodus 21:7 - 8 «If a man sells his daughter as a slave, the rules for setting her free are different from the rules for setting the male slaves free.

Ngole indicated his opposition to homosexuality when he quoted Leviticus 20:13 - which reads: «If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination» - during a debate on Facebook.

«If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.»

Kinda makes a poor judge of character, so if you are willing to debate freely in a conversation on life, the world, the pursuit of knowledge, and all the unknowns in the world with an underage male, then I encourage you to continue the debate freely, but if you feel outmatched in a knowledge criteria and you wish to avoid shame of not understanding enough or even not knowing enough (because they are different) then i will gently step aside as not to harm your ego.

Perhaps Sullivan himself would marry, but, given the great tendency of homosexual males to be promiscuous, many more like him would not, or if they did, would not marry with as much seriousness.

«And if a man sells his daughter to be a female servant, she shall not go out as the male servants do.

If, moreover, one thinks of the tree as the motherly feminine or as a symbol for the whole of nature, the shadows lengthen into a bleak morality tale about an oblivious male chauvinism or about an environmentally destructive anthropocentrism, both ominously foretold when, early on, the boy gathers leaves and weaves them into a crown and struts about playing king of the forest, his nose lifted high in the air.

If the formal teaching of Humanae Vitae is indeed of Christ (as it itself claims, cf. para.s 4 & 6) and that, as we might expect, living in accord with it deepens the quality of married love, strengthens fidelity, brings male sexuality under control, significantly lessens the likelihood of marital breakdown and fosters a generally pro-life attitude then we have done a great disservice to generations of Catholics by failing to break the silence on it.

The prevailing cultural norm across the globe is not only to excuse males who objectify women but to also celebrate such conduct as if it exemplifies true masculinity.

Yet, as Bishop Spong points out, if it was a gay male who taught the Christian church what the love of God means, who defined grace for all people; and who, tortured and rejected as he must have felt, came to understand what resurrection means as God's vindicating act, then in a sense we do owe him a debt of gratitude.

Jesus didn't say anything directly about polygamy either, yet NT scholars on all sides have recognized that if Jesus regarded remarriage after divorce as adultery (a form of serial polygamy), on the grounds that it violated the duality of «male and female,» he certainly regarded unions of three or more persons as adultery (concurrent polygamy or polygamy proper).

Exodus 21:20 - 21 If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his propertIf a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his propertif the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

Of course any male would condemn gays because if they don't they will be viewed as gay.