It examines the number of book and journal articles published by each program's faculty as well
as journal citations, awards, honors and grants received.
Not exact matches
Findings also showed it
as an empirically and conceptually innovative, diverse, vibrant discipline that in many areas sets the intellectual agenda The UK publishes more than its share of major disciplinary
journals; bibliometric indicators reveal international primacy both in volume and
citation impact; and a large number of the seminal publications (books
as well
as articles) continue to have a UK origin UK human geography is radically interdisciplinary and with the spatial turn in the humanities and social sciences has become an exporter of ideas and faculty to other disciplines There was confidence that research in human geography had substantial impact on policy and practice and would successfully meet the challenges of the current impact agenda
«[T] he increased reliance funding agencies place on [such] classic bibliometric indicators»
as short - term
citation metrics and
journal impact measures thus hampers the chances that innovative work will win support and constrains both the progress of science and the career prospects of innovative but lesser - known researchers, the authors observe.
• Survey respondents globally listed the number of publications and reputation of the
journals as the two top criteria for career advancement, followed by funding,
citations, and awards.
However, the
Journal of Immunology publishes 11.2 times more papers and has nearly 5.3 times the number of total
citations as Immunity.
Science is the leading peer - reviewed
journal among its competition for the second year in a row, as published by «Thomson ISI Journal Citation Reports» in Jun
journal among its competition for the second year in a row,
as published by «Thomson ISI
Journal Citation Reports» in Jun
Journal Citation Reports» in June 2007.
They compared these
citation numbers to those of 759 control authors who had published in the same
journal and issue
as a retracted author and found that, on average, authors who had a retraction went on to garner approximately 10 % fewer
citations than the control authors did.
«JIF is a reflection of the
citation performance of a
journal as a whole unit, not
as an assembly of diverse published items.»
► In this week's Science editorial, Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt calls for moving beyond publications,
citations,
journal impact factors, «and derivatives of these such
as the h - index» in efforts to measure the merit of research.
From our analysis it appears that only one editor, Artemi Cerdà, violated our ethical rule that «any manipulation of
citations (e.g. including
citations not contributing to a manuscript's scientific content,
citations solely aiming at increasing an author's or a
journal's
citations) is regarded
as scientific malpractice.»
Trends in Immunology helps to link developments in basic and clinical immunology, and is now established
as one of the top - ranked monthly review
journal in its field, according to ISI's Science
Citation Index for immunology
journals.
Published since 1878, and ranked
as ISI's top - cited physiology
journal (over 50,000
citations in 2016) the
journal's international editorial board is led by Editor - in - Chief Kim Barrett, Distinguished Professor of Medicine at UC San Diego, USA.
This is an evidence based website, so we're very interested in other's assertions
as long
as they are supported by unbiased published peer - reviewed
journal citations, such
as this:
First, even though the
Journal aspires to be international and sensitive to context, its highest level of
citation counts occurred in its first phase, of what the authors describe
as «assumed universality of scaling educational change.»
The various sources for your
citations may be derived from dissertations, books,
journal articles, government documents, pamphlets, websites, and other multimedia sources such
as films and audio recordings,
as well
as other print and digital materials.
As of this writing, the same
journal search for «animal shelter» that yields a mere 150 publications before 2001 brings back over 800
citations from between 2001 and today on topics ranging from disease recognition and testing to enrichment techniques for alleviating stress in shelter animals.
Each conversation is accompanied by complex referencing and
citation that appear in the
journal as an extensive set of footnotes.
Nice not to hamstring one's agenda with such mundane things
as citations to the peer - reviewed literature published in reputable
journals.
E.g. Briffa in his capacity
as a
journal editor asked reviewer Cook to write a reject review (
citation...)
I know that Science, and Nature, and many other sites provide «Cited by» and «Related» links to several different services that track subsequent
citations and mentions, and Google Scholar provides non-scholarly
as well
as journal cross-references.
DeSmog investigated the submission and found that of the 304 footnote
citations in the Peabody document, opinion articles published in media outlets, primarily the Wall Street
Journal, were cited
as supporting evidence 41 times and groups with historical ties to the fossil fuel industry such
as the Cato Institute, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity and the Global Warming Policy Foundation were cited 64 times.
This paper in
Journal of Marine Research has nearly 500
citations and describes vertical eddies in ocean interior using diffusivity
as a metric.
A search of the Science
Citation Index, the comprehensive scientific journal database that indexes virtually every citation a journal article gets in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, reveals that this paper, which Dr. Singer calls a «key research publication», has been cited exactly zero times, as of 2004 (for comparison, Dr. Steven Schneider's 1988 publication in Nature on the same topic, «Simulating the climatic effects of nuclear war», has gotten 16 cit
Citation Index, the comprehensive scientific
journal database that indexes virtually every
citation a journal article gets in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, reveals that this paper, which Dr. Singer calls a «key research publication», has been cited exactly zero times, as of 2004 (for comparison, Dr. Steven Schneider's 1988 publication in Nature on the same topic, «Simulating the climatic effects of nuclear war», has gotten 16 cit
citation a
journal article gets in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, reveals that this paper, which Dr. Singer calls a «key research publication», has been cited exactly zero times,
as of 2004 (for comparison, Dr. Steven Schneider's 1988 publication in Nature on the same topic, «Simulating the climatic effects of nuclear war», has gotten 16
citations).
I would just suggest that anyone commenting on the technical aspects of the dispute actually cite the literature being critiqued rather than use shorthand in referring to those articles, otherwise those critiques will never show up in search results for interested people who are using the
citations (or even partials such
as author names, or date and subject and maybe
journal)
as search terms.
At present,
as you point out, you can get
citations for Canadian cases, provided that they've been cited in
journal articles or U.S. decisions; and this could be a handy way to obtain the
citation if you're unable to query one of the commercial databases — and the case is too old to be on CanLII.
Look for
citations in full - text law
journal and book databases,
as well... [more]
Look for
citations in full - text law
journal and book databases,
as well
as Google Scholar, Google Books.
At the same time, the
journal in many fields grew into the primary measure of reputation,
as journal ranking could be carefully calculated by Impact Factor (average number of times an article is cited within a two - year period), in way not possible with books (for which there was no
citation index).
Kerr believes that the number of
citations for 2007 will increase, however,
as journals post their final 2007 issues to the Westlaw database.
While one
journal hardly makes the case, Google Scholar's
citation count,
as well
as a move to «article - level metrics» among
journals is pointing to the article's achievement
as the measure rather than the
journal title.
These new
journals can make their content immediately available to interested readers across the globe
as they become part of Google Scholar's
citation indexing.
Citation is a subtle business (
as the image above, taken from a typical law
journal article, suggesgts), and if Wikimedia is going to get into the biz, it has to get it right.
With the new fall term just beginning, and thousands of first - year law students across the country entering upon legal studies; and with the student editors of the McGill Law
Journal preparing yet another new edition of the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal
Citation (incredibly, the 8th since its first appearance in 1986), I thought it an opportune moment to add my thoughts on the practice of legal citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal citation as currently pr
Citation (incredibly, the 8th since its first appearance in 1986), I thought it an opportune moment to add my thoughts on the practice of legal
citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal citation as currently pr
citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal
citation as currently pr
citation as currently practised.
Colleague Katharine Thompson has provided me a list of some of the changes she noticed in the new, just received 7th edition of the McGill Guide, known more formally
as the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal
Citation, edited by editors of the McGill Law
Journal and published by Carswell.
Dynamic Contextualization also enables you to easily carry out bibliometrical calculations such
as: the number of quotations received by an article or by an author,
citation source groupings by
journal, by topic, by period.
As one study on Canadian legal
journals that included
citations to Wikipedia discovered, 35 % of
citations to Wikipedia had pertinent content that was significantly altered after the date of
citation.
Those few
journals that call for the
citations in article submissions to be formatted in ALWD style and state rules of procedure (like those in Alabama and Idaho) that specify ALWD style
as a Bluebook alternative have been rendered dead letter.