Not exact matches
Lincoln, in contrast, viewed
judicial activism
as illegitimate,
judicial precedent as problematic, and
judicial supremacy
as despotic.
The
judicial precedent for equal protection for federal laws is somewhat fuzzy
as there is not equal protection clause specifically written
as part of the fifth amendment, and the specific clause is only in reference to states in the fourteenth amendment.
But
judicial precedent from Carl McCall's 1993 selection
as comptroller suggests that attempt would be unlikely to succeed.
Public participation (described
as access to information and
judicial remedy,
as well
as participation in decision making) in development projects not only has legal
precedent in international accords but also has been incorporated into the procedures of international lending organizations.
It taught how to develop case analysis skills through practical exercises, demonstrating an understanding of the techniques of
precedent,
as well
as how to read statutes and understand
judicial approaches to statutory interpretation.
Actually, if we're going to be technical: it's entirely worthless
as precedent since there's no person lower on the Ontario
judicial pecking order (unless things have changed in Ontario since the end of 2012) than a deputy judge of the small claims court.
Many times, courts will lift string - cites and parentheticals from other
judicial opinions, with a notation such
as «cited in...» Is that plagiarism — or
precedent?
Cs made their claim and in doing so, relied upon the commentary in Volume 38 (2) of the Encyclopaedia of Forms &
Precedents that states the inclusion of a «call - in» clause should at least be considered in any case other than: «the very simplest cases such
as an application for change of use or for the carrying out of relatively minor building operations where... it is unlikely that the grant of planning permission would be challenged by third parties by way of
judicial review....»
The laws governing taxation, trade and commerce, labor relations, and governmental operations,
as well
as the principle of
judicial precedent, are all derived from American laws and traditions.
Mr. Sirota offers quite a bit to chew on in just over 1000 words, but his argument,
as I understand it, boils down to the following propositions: 1) Judges must generally apply the law
as written and should work to foster stable legal doctrine, 2) In applying the law, judges can not avoid making moral and value - laden judgments; and 3)
Judicial moralizing is, to a certain extent, desirable due to «democratic process failures,» meaning that the legislative process is not properly responding to the changing will of the people (Mr. Sirota also discusses briefly the circumstances in which courts should be permitted to overrule
precedents.
As with
judicial precedents developed under the former rules, I expect there will be some seemingly inconsistent judgements dealing with the issue of independent medical exams under the current rules and eventually the BC Court of Appeal will likely weigh in on the issue to bring some clarity to the law.
As it is so drastic, and in the absence of a direct benefit to the child,
judicial approval is unlikely, not least because it could set a
precedent for every family with a severely disabled child.
It is, arguably, a specific instance of the broader question of how the law ought to deal with unusual situations on which
precedent is lacking;
as I observed here, in a post prompted, in part, by prof. Magliocca's musings on the subject of
judicial review of unusual statutes, that broader question is not an easy one.
The outcome of the proceedings, however, would have a special significance in the entire
judicial system,
as it would be a primary
precedent guiding the superior Courts dealing with electoral disputes at all levels58.
The bank asked that their appeal be heard because the issue of whether lenders who become owners of residential premises through a
judicial process such
as foreclosure are responsible for tenants» security deposits arises quite often and the RTDRS therefore had need of a
precedent when faced with similar situations in the future.