Some states label some, but not all, of the indicators that qualify
as measures of school quality or student success with this term.
This analysis categorizes both sets of indicators
as measures of school quality or student success.25
The analysis in this brief considers all measures that qualify
as measures of school quality or student success under ESSA — regardless of state plan organization or labeling — as this type of indicator.
«While researchers are often frustrated when journalists equate test scores with school quality, journalists are not alone in this — parents and state and federal policies often — mistakenly — consider test scores
as measures of school quality.»
As this table shows, many state ESSA accountability plans include chronic absenteeism, or other related indicators,
as measures of school quality.
While grades on the Chance - for - Success Index are sometimes interpreted
as measures of school quality, researchers from CREDO found that the grades are closely related to measures of family income and the level of education achieved by parents in a state, and do not represent the contribution of a state's schools to the success of its youngsters.
Every other potential quality metric tested in this survey far surpasses testing
as a measure of school quality: having extracurricular activities, art and music classes, advanced academic classes, technology and engineering classes, and efforts to develop students» interpersonal skills.
Additionally, the misguided practice of using spending amounts
as a measure of school quality has helped protect local school - funding levels from any effort to reasonably adjust them.
Alaska is working local interim tests into its accountability system
as a measure of school quality or student success for elementary schools.
The proposed plan instead doubles down on the use of state standardized test results by proposing use of student performance on STAAR Math and Reading
as the measure of school quality or student success for elementary and middle schools.
Not exact matches
Among the 92
school - age children aged 9 to 11 in the study, each snack raised their diet
quality by 2.31 points,
as measured on the Healthy Eating Index, 2005 developed by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
Even
measures of growth in test scores or VAM are not rigorously identified indicators
of school or program
quality as they do not reveal what the growth would have been in the absence
of that
school or program.
Their peers» average test scores are about 0.15 standard deviations higher, and the new
schools have higher -
quality teachers,
measured in terms
of the fraction
of teachers with less than three years» experience, the fraction that are new to the
school that year, the percentage
of teachers with an advanced degree, and the share
of teachers who attended a «highly competitive» college
as defined by the Barron's rankings.
These
school indicators should also incorporate other
measures of key ingredients to long - term success, such
as student performance in writing and oral presentations, teaching and curriculum
quality, student attitudes and culture, attendance, and
school leadership and management.
Looking across our analyses, we see that under IMPACT, DCPS has dramatically improved the
quality of teaching in its
schools — likely contributing to its status
as the fastest - improving large urban
school system in the United States
as measured by the National Assessment
of Educational Progress.
The NEPC report paints a dismal picture
of student learning at K12 - operated
schools, but the fatal flaw
of the report is that the
measures of «performance» it employs are based primarily on outcomes such
as test scores that may reveal more about student background than about the
quality of the
school, and on inappropriate comparisons between virtual
schools and all
schools in the same state.
But
as we turn to new
measures of school quality including production
of college and career ready students there is new space for advocates to research and promote the benefits
of school counselors.
Many states nonetheless interpret the index
as a simple
measure of school quality.
We also strongly urge states not to use «growth to proficiency»
measures,
as these encourage
schools to ignore the needs
of their high - achievers (and are poor indicators
of school quality).
For youth in the high - risk group, the gain
as measured by these
quality indicators is roughly equivalent to moving from one
of the lowest - ranked
schools to one around the district average.
Perhaps there are some «wrong» answers (such
as relying exclusively on proficiency rates in reading and math to judge
school quality, or
measuring school spending and other inputs and calling it accountability) but mostly there are a whole bunch
of right and partially - right answers, depending on policymakers» goals and states» idiosyncrasies.
Instead
of using reading and math tests
as one useful tool, many reformers have made these results the defining
measure of school quality.
Of the elementary and middle schools the survey respondents rated, 14 percent received a grade of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual school quality as measured by the percentage of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
Of the elementary and middle
schools the survey respondents rated, 14 percent received a grade
of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual school quality as measured by the percentage of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual
school quality as measured by the percentage
of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
of students in each
school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08
school year.
My results confirm that lower inspection ratings are associated with sharply declining
school quality as measured by student perceptions
of teacher practices.
First, using years
of school as a
measure of quality, it appears that the education level
of teachers has declined relative to the
schooling of other workers, no matter how skilled.
To sum up: 1) low - stakes tests appear to
measure something meaningful that shows up in long - run outcomes; 2) we don't know nearly
as much about high - stakes exams and long - run outcomes; and 3) there doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between test - score gain and other
measures of quality at either the teacher or
school level.
REVIEW: Water Science for
Schools examines a wealth
of water topics such
as water properties, how much water is there on earth and where, how water
quality and stream flow are
measured, the water and water - use cycles, national maps showing how water is used by state, surface and ground water, pesticides in ground water, aquifers, and glaciers and icecaps.
Considering the fact that
school buildings need to be fit for purpose in order for staff to deliver
quality and innovative teaching, he looks at the case
of the first
school built under the PSBP, which he notes
as of December 2014, is still in Special
Measures.
The report recommends various
measures to help close the achievement gap, including: more investment in early years education; ensuring all
schools have access to good examples
of top
quality teaching and leadership; good careers guidance for all pupils; extra support for teachers, such
as a mortgage deposit scheme to help high - performing
school staff get on the housing ladder; and promoting and
measuring character development, wellbeing and mental health in
schools.
Confidence in gross findings can be developed by replication, by averaging results over several time periods, and by using several
measures of the development
of human capital — not tests alone, but also attendance rates, dropout rates, and promotion rates (a very high -
quality assessment will track indicators
of human capital such
as post-secondary
school earnings and higher - education outcomes
as well).
The
quality of the teachers in our
schools is paramount: no other
measured aspect
of schools is nearly
as important in determining student achievement.
Holding
schools accountable for student attendance is ramping up under the Every Student Succeeds Act,
as most states so far intend to use some
measure of attendance (or absence)
as an indicator
of school quality.
Texas's Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plan counts the College, Career, and Military Readiness indicator
as 40 %
of the
School Quality and Student Success (SQSS)
measure for high
schools.
Accreditation also
measures different aspects
of a district or
school, in addition to student performance, such
as parent communication and participation, improvement plans, leadership effectiveness, curriculum and instruction
quality, student mentoring, use
of technology, and professional development.
New York's Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plan builds on this long - standing work and includes the College, Career, and Civic Readiness Index
as part
of the
School Quality and Student Success (SQSS)
measure for high
schools.
A direct
measure of family social background would be better than one that mixes in such factors
as books in the home and the
quality of peers at
school.
We
measured actual
school quality as the percentage
of students in a
school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on the state's accountability exams (taking the average proficiency rate across the two subjects).
The law also requires at least one additional
measure of «
School Quality or Student Success» (SQSS), such as student engagement, college readiness, or school cl
School Quality or Student Success» (SQSS), such
as student engagement, college readiness, or
school cl
school climate.
And that brings us to those unanswered questions: Can the charter -
school movement grow to sufficient scale for long - term political sustainability if we continue to use «
quality» —
as measured by such factors
as test scores —
as the sole indicator
of a successful
school?
If such
quality - control
measures can be adopted in other communities, charter
schools should be supported
as a means to increase the supply
of good
schools available to poor children.
The Scholars» Paradise model would use «scale scores» or a «performance index» for the «academic achievement» indicator;
measure growth using a two - step value - added metric; pick robust «indicators
of student success or
school quality,» such
as chronic absenteeism; and make value added count the most in a
school's final score.
This new unit should focus on providing a student experience that excels on
measures different from the traditional
measures of quality — such
as top - notch extracurricular offerings and state -
of - the - art facilities — that private
schools have historically used.
Our results indicate that citizens» perceptions
of the
quality of their local
schools do in fact reflect the
schools» performance
as measured by student proficiency rates in core academic subjects.
In the upcoming weeks, we will continue to dive into some individual state plans that have proposed to use non-traditional indicators to
measure school quality such
as physical fitness assessments, emotional support observations, and exploration
of arts, among other factors.
When it comes to
measuring the
quality of a
school, policy leaders tend to embrace standardized tests
as the go - to indicator, whereas parents and community members tend to rely on reputation, word -
of - mouth, and what they perceive with their own eyes.
Given that we have difficulty agreeing on learning targets, is it possible to use student learning success
as an accurate
measure of school quality?
Attendees asked questions about the use
of chronic absenteeism
as an indicator to
measure school quality or
school success in ESSA plans.
Districts should be key drivers within comprehensive accountability systems by supporting continuous improvement, tracking additional
measures of school quality and student success, using these
measures to inform local decisions about resources and supports, and serving
as laboratories
of innovation for the state;
As part
of its
school quality measure, Illinois seeks to include a «fine arts indicator based...
The Hamilton Project authored a report recommending the measurement
of chronic absenteeism
as ESSA's fifth indicator, which the authors identify
as a choice states must make under ESSA to
measure «
school quality or student success.»