The H.R. 5282 would also allow consumers to fix errors on their reports without needing to show
as much proof that is needed now.
Depending on the value of the loan (or the value you want to recoup), you might be able to go through small claims court where you don't need
as much proof to get a judgement.
Agents and publishers want
as much proof as possible that there are lots of potential readers out there for what you're writing about.
The school's score is
as much proof that kids can learn despite their socioeconomic level and English - language - learner status as it is an endorsement of Hiawatha per se.
When we do these type of Investigations we provide
as much proof as possible.
All of this is provided to give
you as much proof as possible to prove this isn't a truthful honest dating service.
Please provide
as much proof as you can — letter, chat transcript, links etc. for us to investigate.
And the partisans on the right that made those charges against Obama / Clinton had just
as much proof as the partisans on the left have now against Trump.
- They have just
as much proof for their existence.
But I have
as much proof that I am god as the religious nuts have proof that their god exists — zero
Sadly, there is
as much proof of the existence of Zeus as there is proof of the existence of your christian god.
O but no there wouldnt be, most of you hide from society, not for fear that you will be judged, but just that simple fact, that you got about
as much proof nothing exist beyond this place, as I do that there is!
The general idea is that there is
as much proof for a deity they call the «Flying Spaghetti Monster» as there is for a loving, Triune God (or any other deity), so they «worship» an imaginary, spaghetti - like thing and conclude their prayers with «Ramen» instead of «Amen,» which is admittedly clever.
The general idea is that there is
as much proof for a deity they call...
And there is just
as much proof for those other gods as there if for your god.
Before we say we are right and they would be wrong, let's not forget they would have
as much proof as we have.
To us, there's just
as much proof for unicorns as there is god.
The good news is that there is just
as much proof that Valhalla exists as there is proof of Heaven!
There is
as much proof (more so in some cases) that Big Foot, the Loch Ness Monster and backside probing aliens exist than there is of gods.
I'm not saying that I believe this, of course there is about
as much proof to this as there are to any other religions.
He says that he has
as much proof for the existence of Jesus as he does for the existence of Einstein.
Their is
as much proof for Noah as there is for ID.
Not exact matches
These agreements are
as much about expanding his footprint
as they are
proof points for other retailers: If White's shoes are good enough for the toniest retailers in North America, then they're good enough for Selfridges in London, Brown Thomas in Ireland, and so on.
While his burger has not yet stimulated our culinary juices
as much as our innovative ones it's a powerful
proof of concept and important first step.
They believe UTXO has
much more in scalability terms for business functions by having limiting information and «
Proof of Consensus» model, and they wanted to build something that could act
as the ether for those who were hard at work mining in the bitcoin UTXO community.
But,
as of yesterday, new
proof has come out showing how
much millennials» debt is affecting the economy.
Zhao had previously declined requests from Bloomberg News to grant access to Binance's financial statements, or to provide
proof of his personal wealth, which he claims is
as much as $ 2 bln.
There are many entrepreneurial opportunities out there to pick from, but if you are searching for a business idea that is recession
proof, allows you the ability to earn
as much money
as you want and is a cost effective business option, then Commercial Capital Training Group may be the solution for you.
The combination of fear, social
proof [other investors are selling], loss aversion [we feel losses twice
as much as gains] and recency bias [we overweigh what has happened recently and underweigh or ignore the long term evidence] counteract the average investors attempt to make a rational decision.
Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «
proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that
much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even
as sound
as much of his scientific work is.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so
much to you that you use it
as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same
as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious
as far
as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism
as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of
proof falls in your lap
as it is the base of your religion.
The critical point is, one might say, not so
much the
proof as the pudding it's in.
They point to the priest sex scandals
as proof positive that chastity is too
much to ask of people — completely ignoring that it was the randy absence of chastity that created the scandals in the first place.
I'm not even actually denying that Jesus was real, but there is absolutely no
proof that he was the son of god or divine in any manner, so sorry, he holds
as much credence
as Harry does.
However, to accept historical accounts that G - d did once reveal Himself to mankind would be fair
as proof,
as much as one accepts accounts that Julius Caesar existed
as proof that he existed.
(And rendering only a partial quote is
much like biblical
proof texting in my opinion) I am kind of a stickler on such details,
as a sloppy portrayal of another's words often leads to inaccurate representation of their intent.
There is no tested evidence of these natural explanations,
much less
proof, but the existence of multiple natural possibilities negates the Big Bang and Inflation
as proof of God (that doesn't mean it proves No God, it means that it can't prove God did it since there are other alternatives).
@jimtanker — you don't have to be insulting when you share your opinion... It's your choice to believe what you wish but don't insult everyone else in the process... Just remember that there's so
much that your «thinking» brain can't explain and
as a «thinker» you shouldn't dismiss anything just because you have no
proof.
There is, of course,
as much credible
proof that Paul actually saw his god,
as there is that Joseph Smith had a «special visit» — that is — none.
Ok where is your
proof that things in the bible are fictional you have to have faith that they are fictional just
as much as we have faith that they are real therefore you are in a way proving Christianity true
Ok you have
as much FAITH in your
proof as she does that see has seen angels so there for you are believing in something you have not seen right you have not seen here medical records to prove that she has Schizophrenia.
So,
as much as it would be lovely - looking
proof of God's existence, that sudden perfecting of believers, alas, that's just not how it works.
God bless you richly Jeremy, thank you so
much for blessing me... now the
proof will be shown
as I do share my «coals»
@david johson your long response offers no
proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «
proof «you admitted
as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that,
as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.
His own pet
proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a
proof in which he takes
much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too
much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described
as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»
I suspect that science doesn't prove
as much as you think, and I can assure you that the things it does prove are not
proof that God does not exist.
So who cares about religious people, you can't convince someone of reality when they fabricate their own, they fabricate their
proof, their facts, best thing is just do your thing and stay way from them
as much possible, most of the times they turn more people into atheists than atheists themselves by the things they say and do anyway, lol so no need for us to do it.
The best part of all this discourse is that it serves
as undeniable
proof that God does exist and He created you all; if you truly believed that there is no need to worship God because He is a made up piece of fiction, would you actually spend this
much time arguing over some ridiculous fallacy?
Also, it sort of invalidates your comment about feeling sorry for atheists when 1) you are also on this blog so you have about
as much of a stake in this
as any atheist here and 2) if agitating christian ranks only takes asking for
proof and debating religion in a coherent matter, christian foundation must be pretty shaky indeed.
There is no
proof to prove there is no existence of a God, as much there is Proof that God does not e
proof to prove there is no existence of a God,
as much there is
Proof that God does not e
Proof that God does not exist.