Sentences with phrase «as none of the question»

Speaker John Bercow isn't impressed, and moves on as none of the question had anything to do with Hunt's responsibilities.

Not exact matches

None of the security guards named in the lawsuit were charged, although FBI special agents told BuzzFeed News that two of them were questioned as «persons of interest.»

I'm not sure what I said to lead you to believe that I am «throwing out the most proven and fundamental laws of science» since I'm pretty sure that none of the laws that you mention describe a need for the past to be gone and the future to not exist yet, and I was only forwarding a theoretical possibility with apparently good evidence as far as I can tell to address the question «Why would matter come into existence all by itself for no good reason?»

I'd like to suggest — in strictly tentative fashion as a hypothesis that I am amusing myself with these days — that as important as each of those questions are, none of them should be the starting point for our doctrine of creation.

Questioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where theQuestioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where thequestioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where there is none.

None of these questions can be answered outside of a theological framework of Christian belief in a personal God who has made us for fellowship with himself and for obedience to his will, who cares for us as individuals, and within the channels of his orderly world gives heed to our petitions.

Such a «between - existence» poses a question to Buber's contemporaries — whether they will make use of it as a bridge of understanding between camp and camp or lay it aside as indifferent to all camps because it can be exploited by none.

Of course, none of them claim certainty, and many disagree among themselves, and the work could never be finished as there's always the possibility of new evidence being discovered, so that's really not an answer to those questionOf course, none of them claim certainty, and many disagree among themselves, and the work could never be finished as there's always the possibility of new evidence being discovered, so that's really not an answer to those questionof them claim certainty, and many disagree among themselves, and the work could never be finished as there's always the possibility of new evidence being discovered, so that's really not an answer to those questionof new evidence being discovered, so that's really not an answer to those questions.

In fact, in discussions of how God might be conceived as conscious or knowing, his comments range all the way from raising the question whether God is really conscious at all to speaking none too clearly of «super-linguistic consciousness» or of «the One who knows without symbol (or for whom everything whatever serves as symbol)» (1967, 4f.

To more directly answer HeaveScent's questions: Sandusky has probably broken many of them and his pastor may have too, but as far as I know he is not charged with anything, so relative to this case, I believe the answer is none.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

None of our questions is so real, so poignantly real, as this one.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Kinda makes sense though, the only reason people are asking for another CDM is because we all fear the possibility of injury to coquelin and know flamini is usless, beilick is inexperienced so it begs the question what happens if an injury where to occur, but wîth how many midfielders we have in the squad i think it could allow us to change a tactical approach and potentially experiment with people like Ramsey and Wishere potentially playing a deeper role??? But the striker is a must as i mentioned earlier Giroud went 8 games without scoring a goal and none of the other strikers stepped up to the plate, we cant have a drought of goals when your the quest for titles...

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Paulinho, Ander Herrera, Jean Michael Seri and Oriol Romeu are all explicitly mentioned in the report, but all come with their own difficulties as none of the clubs in question will want to sell.

A fixture that usually promises goals had none and Mourinho will have been the more satisfied given the questions he has faced of late, questions as to whether against such forceful managers as Jurgen Klopp he can still cut it.

Although I totally questioned being called influential anything I protested none as any mention of philanthropic causes make me giddy.

We were unable to answer questions about the effectiveness of education and support for breastfeeding multiples from different care providers and the training of care providers, nor of the timing, intensity or form of support, as none of the studies examined these issues.

I don't have time to hunt for references, but none of the existing answers mentioned alternate methods (internally generated, such as organizers giving out pins / etc... and counting how many were given); and then there's a related question discussed on a resent 538 podcast over the accuracy of internal estimates by organizations.

None of the three defendants said responded to reporters» questions as they exited the downtown Buffalo courthouse.

UK Independence Party MEP Nigel Farage, speaking on BBC One's Question Time, said there was not a «single memorable phrase» in the entire 90 minutes, adding «more people will not turn out at the polls as a result of tonight's debate» and the winner would be the «none of the above party».

And yet most of the articles in a recent issue of the Commons» House Magazine (16 May) are written on the assumption that none of the questions which has been re-examined ad nauseam in the past two or three decades can be taken as read.

Then the work really started: we needed to understand which of our questions will be answered in the next decade or so by telescopes already being built (such as NASA's JWST, TESS, or the 30m - class ground - based telescopes)-- none of those questions were interesting for our report.

So an important question left unanswered was: what features in these proteins explain why none of them are able to act as «slicers»?

None of it's quite capable of making Halloween exciting, alas, and the lingering question as to whether the great monsters of the cinema should ever get a backstory scores another resounding «no.»

Undefeated is easy to watch and invest in, even as you question whether the time and enthusiasm on display wouldn't be better spent on education and reversing the trends that see almost every player indicate having a relative in jail and almost none of them identifying themselves as the product of two college graduates.

Declaring education to be an implicit fundamental right would raise difficult constitutional questions about essentials such as food, shelter, and health care — none of which are mentioned in the federal Constitution.

5 Worksheets covering all the circle theorems - around 50 questions in total including answers Circle Theorems 1 is 10 questions on the angle at the centre and also the same segment Circle Theorems 2 is 10 questions on angles in a semicircle and a cyclic quadrilateral Circle Theorems 3 is 6 questions on radius / tangent and 2 tangents from one point Circle Theorems 4 is 6 questions on the Alternate Segment Theorem Circle Theorems 5 is 20 questions on all the theorems None of these questions are ridiculously complex as you get in textbooks and they are extremely well drawn though not to scale.

As you can imagine, there are lots of answers to that question, and none of those answers are simple.

No surprise, I guess, that none of the other «issues» about which the EVAAS has been continuously questioned and critiqued were addressed in this article (e.g., about fairness and the teachers who are not TVAAS eligible, validity or the lack of relationships between the TVAAS and other indicators of quality in Tennessee, subject and grade level bias, as written about here and here, etc.).

There's an easy answer to that question: None of the Harlequin lines have applied for eligibility as a publisher.

Unfortunately it is currently lacking a lot of information (no Nook data, Azardi still a question mark), and has some incorrect data in the Kindle listings regarding fixed layout that are clearly based on specs rather than actual hands - on testing (i.e. just because the User's Guide doesn't list «orientation - lock: none» as an option doesn't mean it isn't possible).

As I am none of those things, I had plenty of questions to work with.

While you may think it is none of your business to ask personal questions such as the presence of children or future children, they are essential to the future well - being of your Dog.

You are not being a nuisance, and a good veterinarian will not be offended by your questions (none of us are perfect, as I explain in chapter 4).

Expect answers to absolutely none of these questions with the update, as it's focused instead on sending players up to level 170 through the usual adventuring antics.

And, given the agreement as we now understand it, we are left with a question to which none of us alive will likely ever know the answer.

Climate sensitivity is something that we (as scientists) get excited about because it is a relatively well - posed question (none of that messy economic analysis or human behaviour include).

Respondents also reported their political self - identification (Democrat, Republican, Independent, or Other / none of the above), educational attainment, and environmental concern, the latter of which was borrowed from the same earlier survey and used here as a brief, one - item measure (see Appendix for question wordings).

PS: I live in France where 75 % of the electrical energy is produced by nuclear plants... This reliance on nuclear energy is considered as a danger and a weakness by some of our politicians... The question has been long debated, especially after Fukushima, but none of them has ever been able to propose a credible alternate.

None of this will be possible without engaging decision - makers and other affected parties from the very beginning of the assessment process, including at the scoping and question formulation phase, subsequently as authors, and finally in helping to convey assessment findings to diverse audiences.

I am not persuaded because: a) they have not spoken at all of the kind and quality of work that has been done to address this question — it is ignored, presumably dismissed out of hand; b) they (Steve G) avows that none of «The Team» has examined the issue, when clearly they have, working alongside and publishing with the very Schweingruber Steve nominates as doing the necessary type of work (according to Steve G) on the matter.

As a follow - up to last week's Clubland Q&A, Mark answers more questions from Mark Steyn Club members around the planet on constitutions and virtue, empathy and Afghanistan, and mass shootings of global significance and none.

Joe Lassiter — It's not hard to find the answer to your first question in detail — depends on what you define as «small», and of course none of them are «funded by CRU», it's also easy to «follow the money».

None of the arguments seem to include the question: Can heat emissions from the burning of fossils (and from nuclear power) simply be ignored as a possible cause of global warming?

None of these questions is merely academic, as each has come up at least once in my eighteen years of family law practice.

Indeed in a small survey where I questioned acquaintances as to what they knew of the Jackson Reforms none had ever heard of them.

Certainly none of the patterns in question nor decorative elements made from the patterns in question nor images / derivatives thereof has been used as a brand logo or any such by any of the sources from which I've obtained the patterns, for instance.

CrowdJustice does some due diligence to ensure none of the parties to the lawsuit are subject to any kind of national or international sanctions (such as Securities and Exchange Commission violations, federal or international court matters) and verifies that the case in question is under active litigation by a licensed attorney.