A great many of these events begin at temperature ranges far above the freezing point (though temperatures on the ground can drop precipitously
as the nucleation process unfolds).
Bacteria in the atmosphere, for instance, work
as nucleation sites for water droplets.
In large systems such a spontaneous transition is thought to occur due to a cosmic ray or some other local radiation that entered the sample to act
as a nucleation point, or it is triggered by vibration.
Then, one of four other metals (nickel, cobalt, copper, or iron) acts as a scaffold, known
as a nucleation site, on which the nanofiber continues to grow.
So that you know, these are little combustible particles in soot etcetera, into the atmosphere and these particles act
as nucleation for clouds and the clouds are reflective.
These lower the freezing point of their body fluids as winter approaches by synthesising antifreeze molecules and getting rid of anything that could act
as a nucleation site for ice crystals to form around, such as gut contents and bacteria.
This formation of new particles is known
as nucleation.
Not exact matches
As the atoms move around in the supercooled state in search for
nucleation sites, the temperature continues to drop.
Just
as the same genes that allow Deinococcus to thrive on the ground may give it the ability to survive at high altitudes, the ice -
nucleation gene may originally have given syringae and bacteria like it an advantage other than rainmaking.
Even
as the importance of biological ice
nucleation was being recognized by agricultural scientists, it still wasn't embraced by atmospheric scientists, who stuck by the traditional view that soot, or sea salt, or some
as - yet - unidentified mineral in dust was seeding ice in clouds.
Here, the authors show that
as the single crystal sample heats up, the alloy's structure changes
as a result of the homogeneous
nucleation of several grains of poly - crystalline structure, towards an austenitic phase.
Ice
nucleation might have emerged
as an ecological handshake between bacteria and the plants they lived on.
It's well known that particles in the atmosphere such
as mineral dust, pollen, heavy metals and even bacteria can act
as seeds for the
nucleation of ice crystals.
«Studying the formation and evolution of jets in metals and, more generally, how materials at extreme conditions respond using X-ray phase contrast imaging is relevant to such things
as meteorite impacts, the performance of explosives and detonators, understanding crack
nucleation and propagation in materials, and the development of new materials with tailored properties whose applications include automotive and airplane components, lighter and more impact - resistant armor, and debris shields in space, to name a few.»
The structure and depth of the indicated minimum remain unknown,
as well
as the height of the activation barrier for
nucleation.
The team found that this ice
nucleation protein, inaZ, acts
as a mold for ice crystals.
The research team - composed of post-doctoral student Ludovic Huguet; Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences professors James Van Orman and Steven Hauck II; and Materials Science and Engineering Professor Matthew Willard - refer to this enigma
as the «inner - core
nucleation paradox.»
Scientists are working to understand their underlying processes, such
as which particle surface properties encourage or discourage ice formation, called
nucleation, so they can accurately simulate how, where, and when clouds are formed.
As the lower atmosphere warms what will happen to the mean altitude of
nucleation and condensation?
Rasmus notes that other factors besides ionization seemed at least
as important in influencing the
nucleation rate.
As Rasmus also mentioned, ions play a role in atmospheric nucleation, but this role is not as important as some make it out to b
As Rasmus also mentioned, ions play a role in atmospheric
nucleation, but this role is not
as important as some make it out to b
as important
as some make it out to b
as some make it out to be.
More trees mean more moisture cycling,
as well
as more cloud and droplet
nucleation from leaf emissions such
as terpenes and bacteria.
As far as the webbly is concerned — no one is suggesting that bosons or fermions play any role in real world droplet nucleation rates in a supersaturated atmospher
As far
as the webbly is concerned — no one is suggesting that bosons or fermions play any role in real world droplet nucleation rates in a supersaturated atmospher
as the webbly is concerned — no one is suggesting that bosons or fermions play any role in real world droplet
nucleation rates in a supersaturated atmosphere.
It's looking more and more like most climate change can be pegged to changes in solar output, either directly through additional warming or indirectly
as decreases in solar output allow more cosmic rays to reach the atmosphere, causing increased cloud
nucleation and therefore increasing the earth's albedo and reflecting more solar radiation.
«Ion - induced
nucleation [cosmic ray action] will manifest itself
as a steady production of new particles [molecular clusters] that is difficult to isolate in atmospheric observations because of other sources of variability but is nevertheless taking place and could be quite large when averaged globally over the troposphere [the lower atmosphere].»
But
as you may know, I am talking about the rising leading edges of AOT plots which relate to early stage cloud formation (i.e.
nucleation — presumably via DMS, isoprenes etc emitting by cyanobacterial blooming).
«Because the primary source of ions in the global troposphere is galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), their role in atmospheric
nucleation is of considerable interest
as a possible physical mechanism for climate variability caused by the Sun.»
If the
nucleation process is started at far above freezing temperatures, then the temps can fall to near freezing or well below
as the process continues.
If Svensmark and other researchers are correct the switch between these states could be due to weakness in the solar wind leading to more galactic cosmic rays entering the atmosphere and increasing the
nucleation for cloud droplets (just
as in a «cloud chamber»).
«In addition we demonstrate that the binary H2SO4 — H2O
nucleation scheme,
as it is usually considered in modeling studies, underestimates by 7 to 8 orders of magnitude the observed particle formation rate and, therefore, should not be applied in tropospheric conditions.»
Patented processes of «chemical ice
nucleation for weather modification» (a primary aspect of climate engineering operations) will likely cause considerable surface icing scenarios
as these materials reach ground level.
Even with the unimaginably extensive sea surface chemical ice
nucleation onslaught by the geoengineers, the Arctic sea ice volumes have continued to plummet
as shown in the graph above.
The development of clouds in such a fashion, which occurs only in a controlled laboratory environment, is referred to
as homogeneous
nucleation.
My point, Max, was that the CLOUD experiment will tell us something about the
nucleation phenomenon, but will not be a realistic test of its quantitative significance in clouds
as they exist in our atmosphere.
As Fred has noted above, CERN CLOUD could provide support for the role of ionizing radiation in aerosol
nucleation, but it won't change that assessment.
The iron sun theory is of course something not even remotely connected with cloud
nucleation - http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iron-02a.html — it is
as stupidly irrelevant
as anything from pig iron headed sou.
As for the generalization of classical
nucleation theory — about which he has not the slightest clue.
The underlying mechanism is that charged aerosols are more effective than neutral aerosols
as ice nuclei (i.e., electrofreezing) and that the enhanced collections of charged evaporation nuclei by supercooled droplets enhance the production of ice by contact ice
nucleation (i.e., electroscavenging).
This lowers the probability that the particles will survive to CCN sizes, and
as a result it reduces the sensitivity of CCN concentrations to changes in the
nucleation rate (Pierce & Adams 2009).
Their freezing can either be triggered by aerosol particles acting
as a so - called ice nuclei (IN), or occur homogeneously (without IN) at about − 38 ◦ C The goal of many laboratory studies was and is to assess the ice
nucleation ability of selected aerosol particles of a... http://search.proquest.com/openview/421dd0783b387a8e030902328dcc6f23/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=105744
He ignores the possibility that decadal variability may be caused by external forcing such
as cosmic rays which are known to cause increased rates of aerosol
nucleation.
The weather makers are desperately trying to engineer winter with unimaginably extensive atmospheric manipulation / geoengineering processes (which includes chemical and / or biological ice
nucleation agents
as a primary element).
With most temperatures on the ground still at well above freezing This is a result of chemical ice
nucleation elements that are being utilized on an unimaginable scale
as the climate engineers try desperately to turn warmth into winter.
As this flow of moisture migrates to the North East, temperatures of over 60 degrees are visible only a short distance from the chemically cooled ice
nucleation zones.
The effect of this chemical ice
nucleation process can be clearly seen
as cells of precipitation suddenty «flash out» to frozen in spite of the far above freezing temperature moisture.