Sentences with phrase «as observational science»

Nick, yes to 1 and 2, leta not forget 3; where Karl is charged with deliberately manipulating data to spit out a very well timed lump of garbage and parade it around as observational science.

Not exact matches

That's just honest observational science either evolutionist or creationist can determine from the same data... or lack of / inaccurate as it may be.

The decision to look on a given statement as primarily theoretical or primarily observational is relative, pragmatic, and context - dependent, as Mary Hesse contends.7 The emphasis may shift with the advance of science and the immediate purposes of enquiry.

The very intellectual weakness of keeping science at arm's length invites the dominant dualistic mindset to interpret scientific as well as other observational data in a reductive manner, which leads to nominalism.

Just as it is important, in order to do justice to the praxis of reason operative in the empirical sciences, to complement their observational and explanatory heuristics with hermeneutical and historical analyses, so it is important, in order to do justice to the praxis of reason operative in hermeneutics and historical reconstructions, to complement their interpretive and reconstructive heuristics with dialectics (BOR 150ff, TW 117ff.).

The joint research team led by graduate student and JSPS fellow Takuma Izumi at the Graduate School of Science at the University of Tokyo revealed for the first time — with observational data collected by ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter / submillimeter Array), in Chile, and other telescopes — that dense molecular gas disks occupying regions as large as a few light years at the centers of galaxies are supplying gas directly to the supermassive black holes.

Published March 29 in the journal Science, the largest - ever observational study of undergraduate STEM education monitored nearly 550 faculty as they taught more than 700 courses at 25 institutions across the United States and Canada.

His current research centers on the development of methods that support rigorous and efficient observational, quasi-experimental and experimental designs in education and social sciences with a specific focus on multilevel structures such as those commonly seen in schooling (e.g., students nested within schools).

I am frequently asked to write on the variety of topics associated to Astronomy such as Observational astronomy, Radio astronomy, Infrared astronomy, Optical astronomy, Ultraviolet astronomy, X-ray astronomy, Gamma - ray astronomy, Astrometry and celestial mechanics, Theoretical astronomy, Solar astronomy, Planetary science, Stellar astronomy and many others.

Science isn't about belief, it's about evidence (observational & experimental) and reasonable conclusions; as long as a teacher sticks to an objective curriculum based on science I would be suppScience isn't about belief, it's about evidence (observational & experimental) and reasonable conclusions; as long as a teacher sticks to an objective curriculum based on science I would be suppscience I would be supportive.

None of the above should be taken as trying to diminish the work of Farman and colleagues whose «old school» brand of observational science certainly paid off, but a result is far more powerful when seen in multiple independent records.

Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the climate record and methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).

Dr. Curry is preserving climate science claims and focusing on very short - term observational results rather than the central issue that AGW was invented as a political meme from inception.

As the relatively new science of climate dynamics evolved through the 1980s and 1990s, it became quite clear from observational data, both instrumental and paleoclimatic, as well as model studies that Earth's climate never was and is unlikely to ever be in equilibriuAs the relatively new science of climate dynamics evolved through the 1980s and 1990s, it became quite clear from observational data, both instrumental and paleoclimatic, as well as model studies that Earth's climate never was and is unlikely to ever be in equilibriuas well as model studies that Earth's climate never was and is unlikely to ever be in equilibriuas model studies that Earth's climate never was and is unlikely to ever be in equilibrium.

As a HubTelescope from many Moons ago myself, I am surprised at how out of touch this person is with the current observational climate science.

It is astounding that dangerous man - made global warming fanatics like Obama and Prince Charles, in addition to all those climate change charlatans at various academies of science such as The Royal Society, prefer to ignore real word observational data on climate and solar activity, in favour of psuedo - science and climate models that consistently have failed in their scenarios and projections.

It's not rocket science although as usual the biases introduced by mans assumptions are often harder to model than simple observational trends, they just create noise around definite natural trends.

Nic writes «Given Forster & Gregory's regression method and observational error assumptions, the error (and hence probability) distribution for the resulting slope coefficient estimate can be derived from frequentist statistical theory, as used in science for many years.»

Given Forster & Gregory's regression method and observational error assumptions, the error (and hence probability) distribution for the resulting slope coefficient estimate can be derived from frequentist statistical theory, as used in science for many years.

Supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, the Duke researchers noted that some observational studies predicted that the Earth's temperature could rise as much as 16 degrees in this century because of an increase in carbon dioxide or other so - called greenhouse gases.

As I have pointed out above you have no understanding of the fact that historical and observational sciences are actually a continuum and generally sciences contain elements of both.