Not exact matches
Using our interactive models, we find that using our $ 43 target
as a take - out price, fairly conservative deal structures and synergy
assumptions could result in an accretive deal for direct peers or regional banks, although given the more
obvious scale synergies possible with peers the accretion potential would seem higher for that group.
Thanks for talking about
assumptions, Anna,
as many marketers are building buyer personas around these
obvious characteristics of their buyers... attributes that anyone could guess and therefore have little value.
I agree with this statement
as far
as it goes; the only problem I have with it is that I feel like there is a basic
assumption here that it is easy and
obvious to tell what behaviors of our own or others are predatory and destructive and which are not.
This is especially
obvious if you view religion
as essentially a source of ethical rules for human behaviour rather than theological truths about God and make the techie
assumption that content equals rules; then, if all your churches come up with the same rules, they must all be based on the same content, and thus they must ultimately all be the same.
The philosophy of absolute idealism, so vigorously represented both in Scotland and America to - day, has to struggle with this difficulty quite
as much
as scholastic theism struggled in its time; and although it would be premature to say that there is no speculative issue whatever from the puzzle, it is perfectly fair to say that there is no clear or easy - issue, and that the only
obvious escape from paradox here is to cut loose from the monistic
assumption altogether, and to allow the world to have existed from its origin in pluralistic form,
as an aggregate or collection of higher and lower things and principles, rather than an absolutely unitary fact.
It seems
obvious that we should accept that
as Israel was in the process of receiving the revelation of Yahweh, some unavoidable
assumptions were made.
If we take Buckner (and I thought we would, because TT always leaves one
obvious hole to use his 1 on and this year that was 5T — correct logic, incorrect follow - up
assumption) they 100 % make that trade,
as one of those guys would be left at 6, and they'd get an extra pick they could then use to go back into the first for a QB.
those who knew the Tories were wrong «uns but had no real political consciousness and following the media zeitgeist were settling into taking on the dominant Thatcherite nostrums
as obvious common sense
assumptions.
Khan addressed one
obvious assumption about the condition right off the bat: «
As for the rumors that were floated, «neuro» is not always about the brain,» his tweet continued.
Some of the difficulties are expected — limited access to information, for instance — but others may not be
as obvious, such
as the
assumptions that instructors bring with them into the classroom.
A final thought: If, in this digital realm, we're not truly purchasing content, but rather «borrowing» it at a set price, and according to someone else's changing rulebook, we
as consumers we deserve to know this up front, in clear and
obvious language (unlike Amazon's clear references to «buying» books, and all the
assumptions of ownership that go with buying books).
Given those
assumptions (which I happen to think are reasonable) it seems to me the
obvious place is to buy non-Australian assets, such
as the Vanguard VTS (total US share market) and VEU (world ex-US) ETFs, and perhaps also some international fixed - interest ETFs.
A lot of this will read
as obvious to some, but now we have the data to back up these common
assumptions on timing of communications.
As you try not to take anything personally, your human brain will start to make all kinds of
assumptions — from the
obvious to the absurd.
As a latecomer to the depths of these excellent discussions there are perhaps
assumptions you've all got behind you, so please forgive what may be an
obvious question.
Very hard to see how you would pin that
assumption down without enough error terms to check the
assumption (and I don't see 1988
as much better) in fact if you look at the graph it's pretty
obvious that a linear fit is not appropriate
as the error term is far from random.
However, it is perfectly
obvious I have little to lean here
as the discussion starts with an
assumption that nuclear is evil, and the objective is to fire off
as many debating points
as possible, no matter how ill thought out and unsubstantiated.
Therefore, it is
obvious that she does not intend to prove
as a fact this
assumption about the partial tear.
Research findings such
as Lamb's of such readily
obvious facts such
as that human beings can and do form multiple attachments are distorted and twisted into recommendations based on an unsupported
assumption that children «should» form specific attachments to specific persons.